Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Please, why does Espeak delete the "H" in phrases like "not have that" - I'm not OK with that.

Please, why does Espeak delete the "H" in phrases like "not have that" - I'm not OK with that.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    tamasg@mindly.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Please, why does Espeak delete the "H" in phrases like "not have that" - I'm not OK with that. I'm not having any of that. Espeak, this is on you, not TGSpeechBox.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    0
    • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
      R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
    • T tamasg@mindly.social

      Please, why does Espeak delete the "H" in phrases like "not have that" - I'm not OK with that. I'm not having any of that. Espeak, this is on you, not TGSpeechBox.

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      tspivey@dragonscave.space
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @Tamasg You can take espeak out of your processing chain and then do whatever you want. Every other synth has its own word to phoneme rules. I can't think of another one that doesn't. It might be difficult if you want to support all those languages, but it should give you a more flexible system in the end.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T tspivey@dragonscave.space

        @Tamasg You can take espeak out of your processing chain and then do whatever you want. Every other synth has its own word to phoneme rules. I can't think of another one that doesn't. It might be difficult if you want to support all those languages, but it should give you a more flexible system in the end.

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        tamasg@mindly.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @tspivey yeah, the language support is the big one, no way to build out so many without extensive rules, although honestly English is the killer and there's already stress dictionary lookup happening, which is really one step away from just outright straight text to phonemes themselves. It's something actively turning around in my head, just not a good comprehensive G2P that doesn't just use ARPANET, which is very archaic. So yeah, huge project, bit by bit 😄

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups