Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I'm gonna be a bit obnoxious here and ask people to please consider before sharing Schrödinger memes, and for two reasons:

I'm gonna be a bit obnoxious here and ask people to please consider before sharing Schrödinger memes, and for two reasons:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
75 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

    You're not going to understand quantum mechanics without a little bit of work, sure, but that's not unique to quantum mechanics at all! That's kind of how learning works!

    The learning required to understand quantum mechanics is not terribly out of line with other fields, but memes like Schrödinger's Cat prime us to believe that it's not understandable at *all*. Which I reject.

    artemis201@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis201@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis201@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #59

    @xgranade my quantum mechanics class in undergrad was entirely and exclusively deriving the 3D equation for the location of an electron in a hydrogen atom.
    It was a terrible class.

    Now, this has mostly nothing to do with quantum mechanics being purposefully mystified for the general public. I just wanted to complain that I took a whole class on it and learned nothing except Psi and operators

    xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • artemis201@mstdn.socialA artemis201@mstdn.social

      @xgranade my quantum mechanics class in undergrad was entirely and exclusively deriving the 3D equation for the location of an electron in a hydrogen atom.
      It was a terrible class.

      Now, this has mostly nothing to do with quantum mechanics being purposefully mystified for the general public. I just wanted to complain that I took a whole class on it and learned nothing except Psi and operators

      xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
      xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
      xgranade@wandering.shop
      wrote last edited by
      #60

      @Artemis201 Oh, gods, there's so much I could say here. The behavior of electrons in hydrogen is *incredibly* complex, and not where I'd ever suggest people start learning new mathematical techniques and new concepts. But that's where QM classes tend to start anyway, and so QM feels more complex than it is — we teach that QM is as hard as those examples.

      artemis201@mstdn.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

        @mxchara The original intent and modern usage of Schrödinger's Cat are both obfuscatory, but that doesn't prevent one from taking something useful away in spite of the intentions behind the thought experiment.

        In the case you highlight, I think that's pretty far outside the reflections that those wielding Schrödinger's Cat intend to cause, but it's awesome that you draw that anyway?

        mxchara@seattle.pinkM This user is from outside of this forum
        mxchara@seattle.pinkM This user is from outside of this forum
        mxchara@seattle.pink
        wrote last edited by
        #61

        @xgranade oh definitely! the Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment is good at demonstrating the limitations of thought experiments, maybe. it's a bit like a highly artificial "trolley problem": the debatable parameters of the thought experiment are what provoke the most thought, rather than the experiment itself =p

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

          @Artemis201 Oh, gods, there's so much I could say here. The behavior of electrons in hydrogen is *incredibly* complex, and not where I'd ever suggest people start learning new mathematical techniques and new concepts. But that's where QM classes tend to start anyway, and so QM feels more complex than it is — we teach that QM is as hard as those examples.

          artemis201@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          artemis201@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          artemis201@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #62

          @xgranade yeah I never felt that QM was particularly difficult. I just felt that we never actually learned much QM in that class, which was mostly just annoying

          xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • artemis201@mstdn.socialA artemis201@mstdn.social

            @xgranade yeah I never felt that QM was particularly difficult. I just felt that we never actually learned much QM in that class, which was mostly just annoying

            xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
            xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
            xgranade@wandering.shop
            wrote last edited by
            #63

            @Artemis201 I didn't understand a bit about QM until I took a quantum computing class. After that, going back to QM it made a fuck of a lot more sense.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

              I'm gonna be a bit obnoxious here and ask people to please consider before sharing Schrödinger memes, and for two reasons:

              • Schrödinger was a serial pedophile, and should not be glorified.
              • Schrödinger's Cat was originally posed as a thought experiment to try and make quantum mechanics more confusing, as a form of ridicule. Its use in the field today is a kind of institutionalized gatekeeping.

              indigoviolet@tech.lgbtI This user is from outside of this forum
              indigoviolet@tech.lgbtI This user is from outside of this forum
              indigoviolet@tech.lgbt
              wrote last edited by
              #64

              @xgranade Idk. I've always used it as a way of demonstrating principles in an easy-to-understand manner and clowning on Schrodinger's misunderstandings at the same time.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                The first is bad enough on its own, but the second gets to why Schrödinger memes do so much damage now, today.

                There's no such thing as two places at once, there's no such thing as alive and dead at the same time, whatever. Those were Schrödinger mocking the idea that one might ever develop an intuitive understanding of quantum mechanics. Today, that same mystery-cult style of gatekeeping gives power to some of the worst people in the field.

                brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org
                wrote last edited by
                #65
                The Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment does not say "alive and dead at the same time" it says until we open the box we don't know if its alive or dead, and opening the box can change its state from alive or dead (also not meant literally, the cat is a symbol of a subatomic particle, not a real cat capable of ressurection).
                xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org
                  The Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment does not say "alive and dead at the same time" it says until we open the box we don't know if its alive or dead, and opening the box can change its state from alive or dead (also not meant literally, the cat is a symbol of a subatomic particle, not a real cat capable of ressurection).
                  xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xgranade@wandering.shop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #66

                  @brettm I assure you, I do have some clue about quantum mechanics, and that I am able to understand that thought experiments are not always literal.

                  Your explanation there is incorrect, though, in precisely the same ways that the Copenhagen interpretation fails if taken too literally.

                  xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                    @brettm I assure you, I do have some clue about quantum mechanics, and that I am able to understand that thought experiments are not always literal.

                    Your explanation there is incorrect, though, in precisely the same ways that the Copenhagen interpretation fails if taken too literally.

                    xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                    xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                    xgranade@wandering.shop
                    wrote last edited by
                    #67

                    @brettm In any case, I'll kindly ask that you not mansplain quantum mechanics to me, of all people.

                    brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                      @brettm In any case, I'll kindly ask that you not mansplain quantum mechanics to me, of all people.

                      brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #68
                      because you clearly know so much about it lol
                      xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • brettm@swarm.coiloptic.orgB brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org
                        because you clearly know so much about it lol
                        xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xgranade@wandering.shop
                        wrote last edited by
                        #69

                        @brettm Yeah, I actually do. I have a literal doctorate in this shit and did it for twenty goddamned years.

                        I'm asking a bit less politely this time: don't be a fucking dick.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                          Here's the trick, though: quantum mechanics isn't inherently more difficult to learn than other technical fields, such as computer graphics. The big conceptual shift is in thinking of states like "the electron is here" or "the electron is there" in the same way you might think about directions.

                          You can understand a map in terms of north and west, but then you also have directions like northwest that are distinct from "north and west at the same time!!1!."

                          bluewinds@tech.lgbtB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bluewinds@tech.lgbtB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bluewinds@tech.lgbt
                          wrote last edited by
                          #70

                          @xgranade The more I actually learn about QM the more all the "woo-woo, paradoxes, many-worlds, the photon follows all paths and interferes with itself!" falls away.

                          Just... it's so much misinterpretation and misrepresentation of phenomena that do not need to be this hard to understand. Gatekeeping obfuscation is absolutely the right description.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                            I'm gonna be a bit obnoxious here and ask people to please consider before sharing Schrödinger memes, and for two reasons:

                            • Schrödinger was a serial pedophile, and should not be glorified.
                            • Schrödinger's Cat was originally posed as a thought experiment to try and make quantum mechanics more confusing, as a form of ridicule. Its use in the field today is a kind of institutionalized gatekeeping.

                            yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yacc143@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yacc143@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #71

                            @xgranade
                            Cough, a little dose of presentism perhaps?

                            Maria Antoinette married at age 14.

                            You'll notice that none of the parents of his "victims" ran to the authorities, even the ones that were irritated (hint a too big age gap can cause that today too, even for adults), that might be related to the fact that Schroedinger's interests were at the time above the local age of consent.

                            While shopping for the youngest model is rather sick IMHO, so is trying to modern standards to historic persons

                            xgranade@wandering.shopX 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • yacc143@mastodon.socialY yacc143@mastodon.social

                              @xgranade
                              Cough, a little dose of presentism perhaps?

                              Maria Antoinette married at age 14.

                              You'll notice that none of the parents of his "victims" ran to the authorities, even the ones that were irritated (hint a too big age gap can cause that today too, even for adults), that might be related to the fact that Schroedinger's interests were at the time above the local age of consent.

                              While shopping for the youngest model is rather sick IMHO, so is trying to modern standards to historic persons

                              xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                              xgranade@wandering.shopX This user is from outside of this forum
                              xgranade@wandering.shop
                              wrote last edited by
                              #72

                              @yacc143 Dude, are you seriously defending pedophilia to me right now? Fuck all the way off.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                @xgranade @cthos I did not know where that quote came from! and now I feel like my life is … indefinably worse, somehow

                                misterdave@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                                misterdave@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                                misterdave@tilde.zone
                                wrote last edited by
                                #73

                                @glyph @xgranade @cthos "tell me the name of God you fungal piece of shit" still goes hard, but it's definitely a context changer.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                                  I'm gonna be a bit obnoxious here and ask people to please consider before sharing Schrödinger memes, and for two reasons:

                                  • Schrödinger was a serial pedophile, and should not be glorified.
                                  • Schrödinger's Cat was originally posed as a thought experiment to try and make quantum mechanics more confusing, as a form of ridicule. Its use in the field today is a kind of institutionalized gatekeeping.

                                  clarfonthey@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  clarfonthey@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  clarfonthey@toot.cat
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #74

                                  @xgranade knew about the cat being a shit metaphor, mostly knew that a lot of his research was still very relevant in quantum mechanics despite that

                                  but holy shit, had no idea about the abuse, and this is a horrible thing to just find out about

                                  it's honestly kinda buried in his Wikipedia article but it does seem to have a decent summary of the situation which is just. wow. physics as a field is so fucking irredeemable sometimes and this takes the cake

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • xgranade@wandering.shopX xgranade@wandering.shop

                                    The first is bad enough on its own, but the second gets to why Schrödinger memes do so much damage now, today.

                                    There's no such thing as two places at once, there's no such thing as alive and dead at the same time, whatever. Those were Schrödinger mocking the idea that one might ever develop an intuitive understanding of quantum mechanics. Today, that same mystery-cult style of gatekeeping gives power to some of the worst people in the field.

                                    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiore@brain.worm.pink
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #75

                                    @xgranade@wandering.shop classical QM is shockingly simple . its fun to learn ! gatekeeping it so much actually sucks 😕

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups