Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. WIRED has gone ahead with publishing an extraordinarily inaccurate article about GrapheneOS.

WIRED has gone ahead with publishing an extraordinarily inaccurate article about GrapheneOS.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
22 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

    A small portion of our response to those questions was incorporated, but not most of it. There's also more we weren't asked about which we can now see is in the article. We tried to address that at in the initial overview at https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/34369-original-grapheneos-responses-to-wired-fact-checker prior to the submitted answers.

    pinsandarrows@pnw.zoneP This user is from outside of this forum
    pinsandarrows@pnw.zoneP This user is from outside of this forum
    pinsandarrows@pnw.zone
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @GrapheneOS I've been a happy user of GrapheneOS for years. Shame to see WIRED's low standards for journalistic integrity here. Wishing everyone at Graphene well. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • von@social.lolV von@social.lol

      @GrapheneOS you should sue them, and everyone else spreading lies and slander about GrapheneOS.

      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      grapheneos@grapheneos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @von We're dealing with Donaldson but that has branched out into an enormous number of different attacks on the project. We can't go after everyone legally even if there's grounds for it. We need to pick our battles carefully for lawsuits. There are a small number of specific people and companies where it may make sense to file a lawsuit but this is hardly one of those situations. It's better to try to pressure them to make fixes to the article and properly incorporate our responses to it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups