Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Even if rich people were no more likely to believe stupid shit than you or me, it'd still be a problem.

Even if rich people were no more likely to believe stupid shit than you or me, it'd still be a problem.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
72 Posts 27 Posters 45 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    The problem isn't whether rich people believe stupid shit; it's the fact that when a rich person believes something stupid, that belief can turn into torment for dozens, thousands, or millions of people.

    Here's a historical example that I think about a *lot*. In 1928, Henry Ford got worried about the rubber supply chain.

    2/

    madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
    madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
    madengineering@mastodon.cloud
    wrote last edited by
    #31

    @pluralistic I mean, it's arguably what killed the Roman empire. Rich Romans got fancy indoor plumbing, made of lead for easy maintenance. The lead leeches onto the water, giving them a strange line on their gums and a tendency to believe idiotic nonsense.

    missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE colmdonoghue@mastodon.ieC davidreed@mastodon.onlineD clayfoot@mastodon.socialC 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      The network also protected him from consequences for his prolific child-rape project, which had more than 1,000 survivors.

      In embracing eugenics junk science, Epstein was ahead of the curve. Today, eugenics is all the rage, reviving an idea that went out of fashion shortly after the Fordlandia era. After all, Henry Ford didn't just build a city where his word was law - he also bought up media companies to promote his ideas of racial superiority:

      Link Preview Image
      The Dearborn Independent - Wikipedia

      favicon

      (en.wikipedia.org)

      30/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote last edited by
      #32

      Despite being too cringe to make it onto Epstein island, Elon Musk is the standard bearer for the dangers of billionaireism:

      Simple Page

      favicon

      (people.com)

      Like Henry Ford, he craves company towns where his word is law:

      Link Preview Image
      Elon Musk Got His SpaceX Company Town. Will He Soon Regret It?

      The explosive early days of Starbase, Texas, are revealing of the new powers—and bureaucratic headaches—the new city gives the aerospace industry leader.

      favicon

      Texas Monthly (www.texasmonthly.com)

      Like Ford, he buys up media companies and then uses them to push his batshit ideas about racial superiority:

      Link Preview Image
      Eugenics isn't dead—it's thriving in tech

      A new book takes on the throughline from the rise of 20th-century eugenics to Silicon Valley.

      favicon

      Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

      31/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        Despite being too cringe to make it onto Epstein island, Elon Musk is the standard bearer for the dangers of billionaireism:

        Simple Page

        favicon

        (people.com)

        Like Henry Ford, he craves company towns where his word is law:

        Link Preview Image
        Elon Musk Got His SpaceX Company Town. Will He Soon Regret It?

        The explosive early days of Starbase, Texas, are revealing of the new powers—and bureaucratic headaches—the new city gives the aerospace industry leader.

        favicon

        Texas Monthly (www.texasmonthly.com)

        Like Ford, he buys up media companies and then uses them to push his batshit ideas about racial superiority:

        Link Preview Image
        Eugenics isn't dead—it's thriving in tech

        A new book takes on the throughline from the rise of 20th-century eugenics to Silicon Valley.

        favicon

        Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

        31/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.fr
        wrote last edited by
        #33

        Like Peter Singer, he is a master enshittifier who never met a junk fee he didn't fall in love with:

        Link Preview Image
        Musk says Twitter will charge $8 a month for account verification after criticism for $19.99 plan | CNN Business

        After facing criticism for his plan to charge Twitter users $19.99 a month to get or keep a verified account, Elon Musk has a counteroffer.

        favicon

        CNN (edition.cnn.com)

        And like Epstein, he wants to seed the human race with his babies, and has built a secret compound in the desert he plans to fill with women he has impregnated:

        favicon

        (www.realtor.com)

        32/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          Like Peter Singer, he is a master enshittifier who never met a junk fee he didn't fall in love with:

          Link Preview Image
          Musk says Twitter will charge $8 a month for account verification after criticism for $19.99 plan | CNN Business

          After facing criticism for his plan to charge Twitter users $19.99 a month to get or keep a verified account, Elon Musk has a counteroffer.

          favicon

          CNN (edition.cnn.com)

          And like Epstein, he wants to seed the human race with his babies, and has built a secret compound in the desert he plans to fill with women he has impregnated:

          favicon

          (www.realtor.com)

          32/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #34

          Billionaires and their lickspittles will tell you that all of this is wrong: the market selects "capital allocators" by executing a vast, distributed computer program whose logic gates are every producer and consumer in The Economy (TM), and whose data are trillions of otherwise uncomputable buy and sell decisions.

          33/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            Billionaires and their lickspittles will tell you that all of this is wrong: the market selects "capital allocators" by executing a vast, distributed computer program whose logic gates are every producer and consumer in The Economy (TM), and whose data are trillions of otherwise uncomputable buy and sell decisions.

            33/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.fr
            wrote last edited by
            #35

            This is a tautology: the argument goes that only good people are made rich, and therefore all the rich people are good. If rich people had as many cherished stupidities as I claim, The Economy (TM) would relieve them of their wealth, and thus their power to allocate capital, and thus their potential to hurt people by being wrong, which means that they must be right.

            34/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              This is a tautology: the argument goes that only good people are made rich, and therefore all the rich people are good. If rich people had as many cherished stupidities as I claim, The Economy (TM) would relieve them of their wealth, and thus their power to allocate capital, and thus their potential to hurt people by being wrong, which means that they must be right.

              34/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote last edited by
              #36

              This is the stupidest (and most destructive) of all of billionaireism's cherished stupidities: that we live in a meritocracy, which means that whatever the richest people want must be right. It's a modern update to the doctrine of divine providence, which held that we can discern god's favor through wealth. The more god loves you, the richer he makes you.

              35/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                This is the stupidest (and most destructive) of all of billionaireism's cherished stupidities: that we live in a meritocracy, which means that whatever the richest people want must be right. It's a modern update to the doctrine of divine providence, which held that we can discern god's favor through wealth. The more god loves you, the richer he makes you.

                35/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                wrote last edited by
                #37

                This *can't* be true, because *every single economic cataclysm in the history of the world was the fault of rich people*. Rich people gave us the 19th century's bank panics. They gave us the South Seas bubble. They gave us the Great Depression, and the S&L Crisis, and the Great Financial Crisis. They invented greedflation and created the cost of living crisis. Today they are teeing up an AI crash that will make 2008 look like the best day of your life:

                Link Preview Image
                Pluralistic: The Reverse-Centaur’s Guide to Criticizing AI (05 Dec 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                favicon

                (pluralistic.net)

                36/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  This *can't* be true, because *every single economic cataclysm in the history of the world was the fault of rich people*. Rich people gave us the 19th century's bank panics. They gave us the South Seas bubble. They gave us the Great Depression, and the S&L Crisis, and the Great Financial Crisis. They invented greedflation and created the cost of living crisis. Today they are teeing up an AI crash that will make 2008 look like the best day of your life:

                  Link Preview Image
                  Pluralistic: The Reverse-Centaur’s Guide to Criticizing AI (05 Dec 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                  favicon

                  (pluralistic.net)

                  36/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                  wrote last edited by
                  #38

                  The old left aphorism has it that "every billionaire is a policy failure." That's true, but it's incomplete. Every billionaire is a machine for producing policy failures at scale.

                  37/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    The old left aphorism has it that "every billionaire is a policy failure." That's true, but it's incomplete. Every billionaire is a machine for producing policy failures at scale.

                    37/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #39

                    Image:
                    Aude (modified)
                    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:80th_floor_of_3_World_Trade_Center_-_OHNY.jpg

                    CC BY 4.0
                    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en

                    eof/

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM madengineering@mastodon.cloud

                      @pluralistic I mean, it's arguably what killed the Roman empire. Rich Romans got fancy indoor plumbing, made of lead for easy maintenance. The lead leeches onto the water, giving them a strange line on their gums and a tendency to believe idiotic nonsense.

                      missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      missqarnstein@eldritch.cafe
                      wrote last edited by
                      #40

                      @madengineering @pluralistic actually it is probably not the lead plumbing as limescale buildup limits the lead concentration in the water.

                      The bigger problem in terms of exposure were pewter plates and pots, especially in combination with fruits or acidic drinks.

                      missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM madengineering@mastodon.cloudM 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM missqarnstein@eldritch.cafe

                        @madengineering @pluralistic actually it is probably not the lead plumbing as limescale buildup limits the lead concentration in the water.

                        The bigger problem in terms of exposure were pewter plates and pots, especially in combination with fruits or acidic drinks.

                        missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                        missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                        missqarnstein@eldritch.cafe
                        wrote last edited by
                        #41

                        @madengineering @pluralistic or the fact they intentionally used lead acetate as a wine sweetener (which continued in europe until mid 18 century)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • missqarnstein@eldritch.cafeM missqarnstein@eldritch.cafe

                          @madengineering @pluralistic actually it is probably not the lead plumbing as limescale buildup limits the lead concentration in the water.

                          The bigger problem in terms of exposure were pewter plates and pots, especially in combination with fruits or acidic drinks.

                          madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                          madengineering@mastodon.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                          madengineering@mastodon.cloud
                          wrote last edited by
                          #42

                          @missqarnstein @pluralistic Looking further into this, I see articles about how "sapa," better known as lead acetate, was used as a sweetener.

                          Thank you for your assistance in understanding the chemistry involved, miss Qarnstein. Chemistry is my weakest science.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • madengineering@mastodon.cloudM madengineering@mastodon.cloud

                            @pluralistic I mean, it's arguably what killed the Roman empire. Rich Romans got fancy indoor plumbing, made of lead for easy maintenance. The lead leeches onto the water, giving them a strange line on their gums and a tendency to believe idiotic nonsense.

                            etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            etchedpixels@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #43

                            @madengineering @pluralistic Until Trump I assumed all the discussions of Nero were hyperbole 😎

                            ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                              Even if Peter Singer were no more prone to ethical missteps than you or me, the fact that he is morbidly wealthy means that his ethical blind spots leave behind a trail of wreckage that rivals a *comet*. And of course, being as rich as Peter Singer inflicts a lasting neurological injury that makes you incapable of understanding how wrong you are, which means that Peter Singer is *doubly* dangerous.

                              21/

                              gneilyo@mastodon.onlineG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gneilyo@mastodon.onlineG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gneilyo@mastodon.online
                              wrote last edited by
                              #44

                              @pluralistic *Paul Singer

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                Even if rich people were no more likely to believe stupid shit than you or me, it'd still be a problem. After all, I believe my share of stupid shit (and if you think that none of the shit you believe in is stupid, then I'm afraid we've just identified at least one kind of stupid shit you believe in).

                                --

                                If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                                favicon

                                (pluralistic.net)

                                1/

                                Link Preview Image
                                enema_cowboy@dotnet.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                enema_cowboy@dotnet.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                enema_cowboy@dotnet.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #45

                                @pluralistic If I only knew what shit that I believed was stupid.

                                ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF tknarr@mstdn.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • gneilyo@mastodon.onlineG gneilyo@mastodon.online

                                  @pluralistic *Paul Singer

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #46

                                  @gneilyo Fixed!

                                  gneilyo@mastodon.onlineG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                                    R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                                  • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

                                    @madengineering @pluralistic Until Trump I assumed all the discussions of Nero were hyperbole 😎

                                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #47

                                    @etchedpixels@mastodon.social @madengineering@mastodon.cloud @pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                    As I posted elsewhere, "if there
                                    are future historians, I wonder if they will wonder if Trump literally golfed while the world burned."

                                    tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • enema_cowboy@dotnet.socialE enema_cowboy@dotnet.social

                                      @pluralistic If I only knew what shit that I believed was stupid.

                                      ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #48

                                      @Enema_Cowboy@dotnet.social @pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      A significant chunk tends to fall into areas where you lack enough knowleged to "know what you don't know". Sadly, there's a lot of people where such "areas" effectively comprise "everything".

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

                                        @etchedpixels@mastodon.social @madengineering@mastodon.cloud @pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                        As I posted elsewhere, "if there
                                        are future historians, I wonder if they will wonder if Trump literally golfed while the world burned."

                                        tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tomf@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #49

                                        @ferricoxide @pluralistic @etchedpixels @madengineering The world would be in a much much better place if all he had done was played golf for 4 years.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          Ford was a vicious antisemite, a bigot, a union-buster and an all-round piece of shit, but also, he believed that his opinions trumped the axial tilt of the planet Earth.

                                          In other words, Henry Ford wasn't merely evil - he was also periodically as thick as pigshit. Ford's cherished stupidities didn't just affect him, they also meant that a whole city full of people in the Amazon had windows facing the wrong direction.

                                          7/

                                          damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #50

                                          @pluralistic I don't understand why the factory would even have to do anything differently. You could simply turn the entire building - or the entire town - around 180 degrees.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups