Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
iposnasdaqindexspacexopenai
71 Posts 40 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 1 1337@techhub.social

    @shredder7579 @MissConstrue my 401k allows me to allocate funds to a "capital preservation fund" (or something like that) that basically tries to stay flat. I.e. you would lose out in any gains elsewhere in the market, but not take losses (hopefully?). I doubt it's typically recommended, but it is an option. Any funds that track stuff like the SP 500 or Nasdaq 100 will have you indirectly allocating a significant proportion of your funds to all these companies heavily dependent on AI (these indexes are very top heavy, but they historically perform the best; likely because monopolies are more profitable).

    missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    missconstrue@mefi.social
    wrote last edited by
    #44

    @1337 @shredder7579

    I'm still reading, and trying to find out what pushback the rules are getting from the real money, and how serious the other indexes are in following the "bow to billionaires" business model.

    I should go see if/what @unusual_whales has to say about the rules, the ipos, and what shorts are being placed...what is real capital doing in the face of this? (None of us have "real capital".)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Q quizzicus@mastodon.online

      @MissConstrue @shredder7579 Why would NASDAQ-100 rules affect funds benchmarked to other indices, though?

      missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      missconstrue@mefi.social
      wrote last edited by
      #45

      @quizzicus @shredder7579

      Because the other indexes are considering adopting identical rules.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

        Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

        Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

        They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

        Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

        They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

        #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

        Link Preview Image
        What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

        SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

        favicon

        Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

        iamnotu@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        iamnotu@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        iamnotu@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #46

        @MissConstrue looking forward to the 'pump and dump'

        missconstrue@mefi.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • htpcnz@mastodon.socialH htpcnz@mastodon.social

          @MissConstrue ok now once enough poor peoples money can be tied up in these scams and once more taxpayer money can be secured to bail out the scams... the crash everyone is rubbing their hands gleefully to come will be here... guess who will not be affected by it at all? the ones running the scams.

          missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          missconstrue@mefi.social
          wrote last edited by
          #47

          @htpcnz Precisely this. This is about to be a massive theft of capital. Massive. Invisibly. But gone, none the less.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S slotos@toot.community

            @MissConstrue Casual Finance video on the topic was quite enlightening - https://youtube.com/watch?v=-X6YzlY_8tM

            missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            missconstrue@mefi.social
            wrote last edited by
            #48

            @slotos Yes! That was brilliant. And I'm so glad that graphic is the thumbnail. It's such an absurd comparison.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • iamnotu@mastodon.socialI iamnotu@mastodon.social

              @MissConstrue looking forward to the 'pump and dump'

              missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              missconstrue@mefi.social
              wrote last edited by
              #49

              @iamnotU The churn is gonna look like feeding time at the gator tank.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

                Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

                They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

                Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

                They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

                #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

                Link Preview Image
                What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

                SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

                favicon

                Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                sibshops@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                sibshops@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                sibshops@mastodon.online
                wrote last edited by
                #50

                @MissConstrue Time to dump nasdaq index funds, then.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kevinashworth@mastodon.socialK kevinashworth@mastodon.social

                  @MissConstrue @shredder7579
                  Ah, I remember back before, to a simpler time when I never understood why the French used those guillotines.

                  saanichguy@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                  saanichguy@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                  saanichguy@mstdn.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #51

                  @MissConstrue @shredder7579 @kevinashworth #frenchrevolution

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                    @troy_frizzell Unfortunately, thanks to the Reaganites and Republicans, EVERYBODY who has a retirement plan in the United States is funding this private equity grab.

                    The GOP and the neoliberals masquerading as the Left gave us 401ks and IRAs. Both of which are deeply, irretrievably, connected to the the financial markets.

                    Every teacher, firefighter, union worker...they've all paid into this slush fund the billionaires are about to raid. The "market" isn't just rich people. They're the ones who make the most money because they have the most resources and inside information, but so many Americans, so many have their future hopes of survival riding on this bubbling, insane, tulip-crazed, stock market.

                    troy_frizzell@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    troy_frizzell@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    troy_frizzell@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #52

                    @MissConstrue

                    I’m 64, just about to retire and absolutely tied to these creepy weirdos.

                    I don’t care.

                    Burn it down.

                    I’ll take the hit. We have to end these leeches that are wrecking our culture.

                    I would happily give up my comfort to end that plague.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                      @Beggarmidas

                      Yes...and no. employees rarely have that kind of autonomy about their 401ks. Also, the laws around index funds are tricky, and excluding a single stock might run into regulatory issues.

                      It's all prospectus. If the fund "tracks an index", then it has to buy in proportional percentages everything in that index. And with companies like amazon and alphabet overweight, it means indexes hold more.

                      These IPOS are coming in bigger than anything has ever come in before, including the Saudi Aramco IPO...and Aramco actually produces profit.

                      So, short answer; any prospectus which covers broad index cannot avoid a singular stock, as I understand it.

                      I am not an expert.

                      Just a moment...

                      favicon

                      (uslawexplained.com)

                      beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      beggarmidas@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #53

                      @MissConstrue Eliminate all investment? Perhaps not. But we CAN firewall a majority of it. It would require employees broadly discussing concerns with employers in small & medium enterprise about risky investments that broadly impact ALL of them, prompting moves to ESGs. For bigger setups weaponization of The Intransigent Minority Rule by having enough core employees & management sticking to their guns & up HR's ass with irritating frequency.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                        Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

                        Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

                        They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

                        Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

                        They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

                        #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

                        Link Preview Image
                        What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

                        SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

                        favicon

                        Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                        decapitae@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        decapitae@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        decapitae@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #54

                        @MissConstrue Dump

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                          @Beggarmidas

                          Yes...and no. employees rarely have that kind of autonomy about their 401ks. Also, the laws around index funds are tricky, and excluding a single stock might run into regulatory issues.

                          It's all prospectus. If the fund "tracks an index", then it has to buy in proportional percentages everything in that index. And with companies like amazon and alphabet overweight, it means indexes hold more.

                          These IPOS are coming in bigger than anything has ever come in before, including the Saudi Aramco IPO...and Aramco actually produces profit.

                          So, short answer; any prospectus which covers broad index cannot avoid a singular stock, as I understand it.

                          I am not an expert.

                          Just a moment...

                          favicon

                          (uslawexplained.com)

                          beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          beggarmidas@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #55

                          @MissConstrue You could also start a petition drive asking the hedge funds to include an investment spread that avoids or only lightly invests in 'high risk' companies forcing premature/irrational market IPOs inclusion. Or hell, just call a spade a spade. Say "X Y Z are forcing high risk investment into medium & lower risk portfolio. We want an index option that specifically discludes companies X Y Z from the index. Get enough signatures on that, hedge fund managers will sit up & take notice

                          missconstrue@mefi.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                            @Beggarmidas

                            Yes...and no. employees rarely have that kind of autonomy about their 401ks. Also, the laws around index funds are tricky, and excluding a single stock might run into regulatory issues.

                            It's all prospectus. If the fund "tracks an index", then it has to buy in proportional percentages everything in that index. And with companies like amazon and alphabet overweight, it means indexes hold more.

                            These IPOS are coming in bigger than anything has ever come in before, including the Saudi Aramco IPO...and Aramco actually produces profit.

                            So, short answer; any prospectus which covers broad index cannot avoid a singular stock, as I understand it.

                            I am not an expert.

                            Just a moment...

                            favicon

                            (uslawexplained.com)

                            beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            beggarmidas@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #56

                            @MissConstrue One final thought on possible tactical approaches. For hundreds if not thousands of years smaller players could sometimes leverage the unlimited ego and ambition of larger players against each other. The techbros believe they are the gods of the market right now. That however, to Hedge Fund managers could be seen as encroachment on their union turf. Bringing big egos into conflict can create a lot of wiggle room for the rest of us.
                            ...Just some thoughts. Better than doing NOTHING.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                              @iamnotU The churn is gonna look like feeding time at the gator tank.

                              T This user is from outside of this forum
                              T This user is from outside of this forum
                              tribactam@social.vivaldi.net
                              wrote last edited by
                              #57

                              @MissConstrue @iamnotU

                              when the guy doing the feeding falls in...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                                Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

                                Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

                                They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

                                Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

                                They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

                                #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

                                Link Preview Image
                                What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

                                SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

                                favicon

                                Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                                artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
                                artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
                                artharg@mastodon.nl
                                wrote last edited by
                                #58

                                @MissConstrue Hmmm … so passive index funds will be forced to include the bloatstocks into their portfolios, right? But to make room for that, they will have to sell off much of their current portfolio. Which means downward pressure on all other stocks. Maybe time to buy some put options?

                                missconstrue@mefi.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • artharg@mastodon.nlA artharg@mastodon.nl

                                  @MissConstrue Hmmm … so passive index funds will be forced to include the bloatstocks into their portfolios, right? But to make room for that, they will have to sell off much of their current portfolio. Which means downward pressure on all other stocks. Maybe time to buy some put options?

                                  missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  missconstrue@mefi.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #59

                                  @ArtHarg I've heard a few analysts say something similar, but I don't have the courage to play the puts and shorts game. I'm more on the dividend aristocrat reinvesting for twenty years side of the board. 😉

                                  artharg@mastodon.nlA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB beggarmidas@mastodon.social

                                    @MissConstrue You could also start a petition drive asking the hedge funds to include an investment spread that avoids or only lightly invests in 'high risk' companies forcing premature/irrational market IPOs inclusion. Or hell, just call a spade a spade. Say "X Y Z are forcing high risk investment into medium & lower risk portfolio. We want an index option that specifically discludes companies X Y Z from the index. Get enough signatures on that, hedge fund managers will sit up & take notice

                                    missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    missconstrue@mefi.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #60

                                    @Beggarmidas There are index and etfs that are not broad spectrum. They're vertical markets that focus on a specific industry or niche.

                                    indices can get really confusing really fast, which is why most people's funds are in broad market, it spreads out the risk...theoretically. I think these rules make that less true than it was.

                                    Simple Page

                                    favicon

                                    (www.investopedia.com)

                                    beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                                      @ArtHarg I've heard a few analysts say something similar, but I don't have the courage to play the puts and shorts game. I'm more on the dividend aristocrat reinvesting for twenty years side of the board. 😉

                                      artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      artharg@mastodon.nl
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #61

                                      @MissConstrue I never did shorts either. Too risky for my tolerance, since the losses are potentially unbounded. Puts and calls are safer: I stand to lose the cost of the option at most. What is actually fun is to buy call options when you sense a short squeeze coming up. Buying them “out of the money” makes them cheap and then when the short squeeze drives up the price of the asset, you can make a nice profit by selling the option.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                                        @Beggarmidas There are index and etfs that are not broad spectrum. They're vertical markets that focus on a specific industry or niche.

                                        indices can get really confusing really fast, which is why most people's funds are in broad market, it spreads out the risk...theoretically. I think these rules make that less true than it was.

                                        Simple Page

                                        favicon

                                        (www.investopedia.com)

                                        beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        beggarmidas@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #62

                                        @MissConstrue It's all very complicated, I suspect by intent to a degree. I mean, we're all pretty well agreed that Crypto is a giant ponzi and that hype around AI has brought in such a level of investment that it's creating it's own special gravity. It's textbook overvalued. Both Crypto & AI have drawn in SO much money, including many deep pockets normally more risk adverse. A bubble popping will almost immediately pop the other as people in a panic create a run cash in their chips.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                                          @Beggarmidas There are index and etfs that are not broad spectrum. They're vertical markets that focus on a specific industry or niche.

                                          indices can get really confusing really fast, which is why most people's funds are in broad market, it spreads out the risk...theoretically. I think these rules make that less true than it was.

                                          Simple Page

                                          favicon

                                          (www.investopedia.com)

                                          beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          beggarmidas@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #63

                                          @MissConstrue BTW: Love your nick. I had an idea for a character absolutely years ago who in the story had a public nom du guerre like Miss Take or Miss Demeanor or Miss Direction or Miss Teak. All very saucy, almost burlesque stage name adjacent for a screenplay I was working on.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups