Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. CERN: First successful road transport of antimatter.

CERN: First successful road transport of antimatter.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
24 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • menos@todon.euM menos@todon.eu

    @Diogenes @nblr Das ist so lange nicht radioaktiv, solange es nicht in Kontakt mit irgendwas anderem kommt, dann schon. Wobei, 26 Protonen, da wird der Stahl in dem LKW deutlich radioaktiver sein.

    diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    diogenes@fuerth.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @menos Meinem Restwissen aus dem Physikunterricht nach: warum sollte der Stahl radioaktiv sein? Und bei der Umsetzung entsteht reine Energie, keine A-/B-/C-Strahlung, keine Nuklide? @nblr

    wonka@chaos.socialW menos@todon.euM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • nblr@chaos.socialN nblr@chaos.social

      CERN: First successful road transport of antimatter.

      Link Preview Image
      BASE experiment at CERN succeeds in transporting antimatter

      Today, in a world first, a team of scientists from the BASE experiment at CERN successfully transported a trap filled with antiprotons in a truck across the Laboratory’s main site. The team managed to accumulate a cloud of 92 antiprotons in an innovative portable cryogenic Penning trap, then disconnect it from the experimental facility, load it onto a truck and continue experiment operation after transport. This is a remarkable achievement, given that antimatter is very difficult to preserve, as it annihilates upon contact with matter. This world premiere is a test, the ultimate aim being to transport antiprotons to other European laboratories, such as Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU), where very-high-precision measurements of the antiproton properties could be performed. Antimatter is a naturally occurring class of particles that is almost identical to ordinary matter except that the electric charge and magnetic moment are reversed. According to the laws of physics, the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. These equal-but-opposite particles would have quickly annihilated each other, leaving an empty Universe. However, our Universe contains predominantly matter, and this imbalance has baffled scientists for decades. Physicists suspect that there are hidden differences that may explain why matter survived and antimatter all but disappeared. To deepen our understanding of antimatter, the BASE collaboration aims to precisely measure the properties of antiprotons, such as their intrinsic magnetic moment, and then compare these measurements with those taken with protons. But they now face a problem: “The machines and equipment in CERN’s ‘antimatter factory’, where BASE is located, generate magnetic field fluctuations that limit how far we can push our precision measurements,” explains Stefan Ulmer, Spokesperson of BASE. These fluctuations are minuscule, of the order of one billionth of a tesla, 20 000 times smaller than the magnetic field of the earth, and undetectable outside the building. “However, the precision of the measurements taken in BASE is such that gaining an even deeper understanding of the fundamental properties of antiprotons will require moving the experiment out of the building.”, says Stefan Ulmer. CERN’s “antimatter factory” is the only place in the world where antiprotons can be produced, stored and studied. Two successive decelerators, the Antiproton Decelerator (AD) and the Extra Low Energy Antiproton ring (ELENA), provide several experiments with low-energy antiprotons – the lower their energy, the easier they can be stored and studied. Among these experiments, BASE holds long-standing records for containing antiprotons for more than one year, and the experiment has invented this pioneering approach in order to move on to the next stage: transporting antiprotons to an offline space for more precise experiments as well as sharing them with others. That’s why they developed the BASE-STEP trap: an apparatus designed to store and transport antiprotons. “Our aim with BASE-STEP is to be able to trap antiprotons and deliver them to our precision laboratories at a dedicated space at CERN, HHU, Leibnitz University Hannover and perhaps other laboratories that are capable of performing very-high-precision antiproton measurements, which unfortunately is not possible in the antimatter factory,” explains Christian Smorra, the Leader of BASE-STEP. “We validated the feasibility of the project with protons last year, but what we achieved today with antiprotons is a huge leap forward towards our objective.” BASE-STEP is small enough to be loaded onto a truck and fit through ordinary laboratory doors, and it can withstand the bumps and vibrations of transport. The current apparatus – which includes a superconducting magnet, liquid helium cryogenic cooling, power reserves and a vacuum chamber that traps the antiparticles using magnetic and electric fields – weighs 1000 kilograms: much more compact than BASE or any other existing system used to study antimatter. “To reach our first destination – our dedicated precision laboratory at HHU in Germany –  would take us at least 8 hours,” says Christian Smorra. “This means we’d have to keep the trap’s superconducting magnet at a temperature below 8.2 K for that long. So, in addition to the liquid helium , we’d need to have a generator to power a cryocooler on the truck. We are currently investigating this possibility.” Nevertheless, the greatest challenge remains on arrival at the destination: to transfer the antiprotons to the experiment without them vanishing. “Transporting antimatter is a pioneering and ambitious project, and I congratulate the BASE collaboration on this impressive milestone. We are at the beginning of an exciting scientific journey that will allow us to further deepen our understanding of antimatter,” says CERN Director for Research and Computing, Gautier Hamel de Monchenault.   Further information:  The media kit about the Antimatter transport is available here. 

      favicon

      CERN (home.cern)

      kruku@mastodon.bida.imK This user is from outside of this forum
      kruku@mastodon.bida.imK This user is from outside of this forum
      kruku@mastodon.bida.im
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @nblr
      Why do I feel this is not good news?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • nblr@chaos.socialN nblr@chaos.social

        CERN: First successful road transport of antimatter.

        Link Preview Image
        BASE experiment at CERN succeeds in transporting antimatter

        Today, in a world first, a team of scientists from the BASE experiment at CERN successfully transported a trap filled with antiprotons in a truck across the Laboratory’s main site. The team managed to accumulate a cloud of 92 antiprotons in an innovative portable cryogenic Penning trap, then disconnect it from the experimental facility, load it onto a truck and continue experiment operation after transport. This is a remarkable achievement, given that antimatter is very difficult to preserve, as it annihilates upon contact with matter. This world premiere is a test, the ultimate aim being to transport antiprotons to other European laboratories, such as Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU), where very-high-precision measurements of the antiproton properties could be performed. Antimatter is a naturally occurring class of particles that is almost identical to ordinary matter except that the electric charge and magnetic moment are reversed. According to the laws of physics, the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. These equal-but-opposite particles would have quickly annihilated each other, leaving an empty Universe. However, our Universe contains predominantly matter, and this imbalance has baffled scientists for decades. Physicists suspect that there are hidden differences that may explain why matter survived and antimatter all but disappeared. To deepen our understanding of antimatter, the BASE collaboration aims to precisely measure the properties of antiprotons, such as their intrinsic magnetic moment, and then compare these measurements with those taken with protons. But they now face a problem: “The machines and equipment in CERN’s ‘antimatter factory’, where BASE is located, generate magnetic field fluctuations that limit how far we can push our precision measurements,” explains Stefan Ulmer, Spokesperson of BASE. These fluctuations are minuscule, of the order of one billionth of a tesla, 20 000 times smaller than the magnetic field of the earth, and undetectable outside the building. “However, the precision of the measurements taken in BASE is such that gaining an even deeper understanding of the fundamental properties of antiprotons will require moving the experiment out of the building.”, says Stefan Ulmer. CERN’s “antimatter factory” is the only place in the world where antiprotons can be produced, stored and studied. Two successive decelerators, the Antiproton Decelerator (AD) and the Extra Low Energy Antiproton ring (ELENA), provide several experiments with low-energy antiprotons – the lower their energy, the easier they can be stored and studied. Among these experiments, BASE holds long-standing records for containing antiprotons for more than one year, and the experiment has invented this pioneering approach in order to move on to the next stage: transporting antiprotons to an offline space for more precise experiments as well as sharing them with others. That’s why they developed the BASE-STEP trap: an apparatus designed to store and transport antiprotons. “Our aim with BASE-STEP is to be able to trap antiprotons and deliver them to our precision laboratories at a dedicated space at CERN, HHU, Leibnitz University Hannover and perhaps other laboratories that are capable of performing very-high-precision antiproton measurements, which unfortunately is not possible in the antimatter factory,” explains Christian Smorra, the Leader of BASE-STEP. “We validated the feasibility of the project with protons last year, but what we achieved today with antiprotons is a huge leap forward towards our objective.” BASE-STEP is small enough to be loaded onto a truck and fit through ordinary laboratory doors, and it can withstand the bumps and vibrations of transport. The current apparatus – which includes a superconducting magnet, liquid helium cryogenic cooling, power reserves and a vacuum chamber that traps the antiparticles using magnetic and electric fields – weighs 1000 kilograms: much more compact than BASE or any other existing system used to study antimatter. “To reach our first destination – our dedicated precision laboratory at HHU in Germany –  would take us at least 8 hours,” says Christian Smorra. “This means we’d have to keep the trap’s superconducting magnet at a temperature below 8.2 K for that long. So, in addition to the liquid helium , we’d need to have a generator to power a cryocooler on the truck. We are currently investigating this possibility.” Nevertheless, the greatest challenge remains on arrival at the destination: to transfer the antiprotons to the experiment without them vanishing. “Transporting antimatter is a pioneering and ambitious project, and I congratulate the BASE collaboration on this impressive milestone. We are at the beginning of an exciting scientific journey that will allow us to further deepen our understanding of antimatter,” says CERN Director for Research and Computing, Gautier Hamel de Monchenault.   Further information:  The media kit about the Antimatter transport is available here. 

        favicon

        CERN (home.cern)

        gom@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gom@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gom@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @nblr Jetzt noch ein paar Dilithiumkristalle und wir sind auf einem guten Weg zum Warpantrieb.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nblr@chaos.socialN nblr@chaos.social

          CERN: First successful road transport of antimatter.

          Link Preview Image
          BASE experiment at CERN succeeds in transporting antimatter

          Today, in a world first, a team of scientists from the BASE experiment at CERN successfully transported a trap filled with antiprotons in a truck across the Laboratory’s main site. The team managed to accumulate a cloud of 92 antiprotons in an innovative portable cryogenic Penning trap, then disconnect it from the experimental facility, load it onto a truck and continue experiment operation after transport. This is a remarkable achievement, given that antimatter is very difficult to preserve, as it annihilates upon contact with matter. This world premiere is a test, the ultimate aim being to transport antiprotons to other European laboratories, such as Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU), where very-high-precision measurements of the antiproton properties could be performed. Antimatter is a naturally occurring class of particles that is almost identical to ordinary matter except that the electric charge and magnetic moment are reversed. According to the laws of physics, the Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. These equal-but-opposite particles would have quickly annihilated each other, leaving an empty Universe. However, our Universe contains predominantly matter, and this imbalance has baffled scientists for decades. Physicists suspect that there are hidden differences that may explain why matter survived and antimatter all but disappeared. To deepen our understanding of antimatter, the BASE collaboration aims to precisely measure the properties of antiprotons, such as their intrinsic magnetic moment, and then compare these measurements with those taken with protons. But they now face a problem: “The machines and equipment in CERN’s ‘antimatter factory’, where BASE is located, generate magnetic field fluctuations that limit how far we can push our precision measurements,” explains Stefan Ulmer, Spokesperson of BASE. These fluctuations are minuscule, of the order of one billionth of a tesla, 20 000 times smaller than the magnetic field of the earth, and undetectable outside the building. “However, the precision of the measurements taken in BASE is such that gaining an even deeper understanding of the fundamental properties of antiprotons will require moving the experiment out of the building.”, says Stefan Ulmer. CERN’s “antimatter factory” is the only place in the world where antiprotons can be produced, stored and studied. Two successive decelerators, the Antiproton Decelerator (AD) and the Extra Low Energy Antiproton ring (ELENA), provide several experiments with low-energy antiprotons – the lower their energy, the easier they can be stored and studied. Among these experiments, BASE holds long-standing records for containing antiprotons for more than one year, and the experiment has invented this pioneering approach in order to move on to the next stage: transporting antiprotons to an offline space for more precise experiments as well as sharing them with others. That’s why they developed the BASE-STEP trap: an apparatus designed to store and transport antiprotons. “Our aim with BASE-STEP is to be able to trap antiprotons and deliver them to our precision laboratories at a dedicated space at CERN, HHU, Leibnitz University Hannover and perhaps other laboratories that are capable of performing very-high-precision antiproton measurements, which unfortunately is not possible in the antimatter factory,” explains Christian Smorra, the Leader of BASE-STEP. “We validated the feasibility of the project with protons last year, but what we achieved today with antiprotons is a huge leap forward towards our objective.” BASE-STEP is small enough to be loaded onto a truck and fit through ordinary laboratory doors, and it can withstand the bumps and vibrations of transport. The current apparatus – which includes a superconducting magnet, liquid helium cryogenic cooling, power reserves and a vacuum chamber that traps the antiparticles using magnetic and electric fields – weighs 1000 kilograms: much more compact than BASE or any other existing system used to study antimatter. “To reach our first destination – our dedicated precision laboratory at HHU in Germany –  would take us at least 8 hours,” says Christian Smorra. “This means we’d have to keep the trap’s superconducting magnet at a temperature below 8.2 K for that long. So, in addition to the liquid helium , we’d need to have a generator to power a cryocooler on the truck. We are currently investigating this possibility.” Nevertheless, the greatest challenge remains on arrival at the destination: to transfer the antiprotons to the experiment without them vanishing. “Transporting antimatter is a pioneering and ambitious project, and I congratulate the BASE collaboration on this impressive milestone. We are at the beginning of an exciting scientific journey that will allow us to further deepen our understanding of antimatter,” says CERN Director for Research and Computing, Gautier Hamel de Monchenault.   Further information:  The media kit about the Antimatter transport is available here. 

          favicon

          CERN (home.cern)

          katzenberger@tldr.nettime.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
          katzenberger@tldr.nettime.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
          katzenberger@tldr.nettime.org
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @nblr

          It's meaningless.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I ichnichdu@mastodon.social

            @nblr wenn man bedenkt, dass das durch die Schweiz muss sind die Zollformalitäten bestimmt auch äußerst interessant 👀

            h4kor@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            h4kor@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            h4kor@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @ichnichdu @nblr ist es ein Import oder Export, wenn Antimaterie exportiert wird?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • diogenes@fuerth.socialD diogenes@fuerth.social

              @menos Meinem Restwissen aus dem Physikunterricht nach: warum sollte der Stahl radioaktiv sein? Und bei der Umsetzung entsteht reine Energie, keine A-/B-/C-Strahlung, keine Nuklide? @nblr

              wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wonka@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @Diogenes Der Stahl, aus dem der Lkw ist, enthält Radionuklide aus atmosphärischen Tests von Nuklearsprengsätzen. Siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel.

              @menos @nblr

              diogenes@fuerth.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • diogenes@fuerth.socialD diogenes@fuerth.social

                @menos Meinem Restwissen aus dem Physikunterricht nach: warum sollte der Stahl radioaktiv sein? Und bei der Umsetzung entsteht reine Energie, keine A-/B-/C-Strahlung, keine Nuklide? @nblr

                menos@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                menos@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                menos@todon.eu
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @Diogenes
                Der Stahl ist radioaktiv, wenn er seit Mitte 40er (Anfang der atmosphärischen Atombombentests) hergestellt wurde; der LKW sieht etwas moderner aus 😉 Natürlich nicht viel, aber messbar, 26 Bq kommen da schnell zusammen. Für hochempfindliche Messgeräte nimmt man auch mal extra "Low background steel" aus Schrott von vor dieser Zeit.
                "Reine Energie" stimmt schon ungefähr, das heißt aber nichts anderes als hochenergetische Photonen AKA Gammastrahlen (hab's gerade noch mal nachgelesen und TIL: Positronen also Betastrahlung können auch entstehen)
                https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation
                @nblr

                diogenes@fuerth.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wonka@chaos.socialW wonka@chaos.social

                  @Diogenes Der Stahl, aus dem der Lkw ist, enthält Radionuklide aus atmosphärischen Tests von Nuklearsprengsätzen. Siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel.

                  @menos @nblr

                  diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  diogenes@fuerth.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @wonka Ach so. Aber diese Radioaktivität kann man vernachlässigen, denn die umgibt uns überall und ist nicht spezifisch für diesen Transport. @menos

                  menos@todon.euM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • diogenes@fuerth.socialD diogenes@fuerth.social

                    @wonka Ach so. Aber diese Radioaktivität kann man vernachlässigen, denn die umgibt uns überall und ist nicht spezifisch für diesen Transport. @menos

                    menos@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                    menos@todon.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                    menos@todon.eu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @Diogenes
                    Ja klar, gefährlich ist das nicht. Sind die paar Protonen dann aber auch nicht.
                    @wonka

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • menos@todon.euM menos@todon.eu

                      @Diogenes
                      Der Stahl ist radioaktiv, wenn er seit Mitte 40er (Anfang der atmosphärischen Atombombentests) hergestellt wurde; der LKW sieht etwas moderner aus 😉 Natürlich nicht viel, aber messbar, 26 Bq kommen da schnell zusammen. Für hochempfindliche Messgeräte nimmt man auch mal extra "Low background steel" aus Schrott von vor dieser Zeit.
                      "Reine Energie" stimmt schon ungefähr, das heißt aber nichts anderes als hochenergetische Photonen AKA Gammastrahlen (hab's gerade noch mal nachgelesen und TIL: Positronen also Betastrahlung können auch entstehen)
                      https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation
                      @nblr

                      diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      diogenes@fuerth.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @menos Die "Hintergrundstrahlung" des normalen Stahls ist da, aber kann man aus Gefahrgutsicht ignorieren, denn die ist immer da.
                      Stimmt, die Energie ist eigentlich Gammastrahlung. Doch die wird einmalig kurzfristig ausgestrahlt, nicht längerfristig wie bei einer radioaktiven Probe mit laufenden Zerfallsketten. Also nicht das klassische Problem der langsamen Verstrahlung von Personen. Und sie erzeugt keine weiteren Kernprozesse, erzeugt also keine Radionuklide.
                      (1/2)

                      diogenes@fuerth.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • diogenes@fuerth.socialD diogenes@fuerth.social

                        @menos Die "Hintergrundstrahlung" des normalen Stahls ist da, aber kann man aus Gefahrgutsicht ignorieren, denn die ist immer da.
                        Stimmt, die Energie ist eigentlich Gammastrahlung. Doch die wird einmalig kurzfristig ausgestrahlt, nicht längerfristig wie bei einer radioaktiven Probe mit laufenden Zerfallsketten. Also nicht das klassische Problem der langsamen Verstrahlung von Personen. Und sie erzeugt keine weiteren Kernprozesse, erzeugt also keine Radionuklide.
                        (1/2)

                        diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        diogenes@fuerth.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        diogenes@fuerth.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @menos (2/2) Positronen-Beta-Strahlung entsteht nicht - aber Beta-Strahlung aus anderen Quellen kann auch aus Positronen bestehen.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups