Member states at the annual United Nations conference on women’s rights rejected Washington’s proposal to narrow the definition of “gender” to mean “men and women.”
-
Member states at the annual United Nations conference on women’s rights rejected Washington’s proposal to narrow the definition of “gender” to mean “men and women.”
https://trans-express.lgbt/post/811682342031802369/the-world-said-no-to-trumps-gender-agenda
-
Member states at the annual United Nations conference on women’s rights rejected Washington’s proposal to narrow the definition of “gender” to mean “men and women.”
https://trans-express.lgbt/post/811682342031802369/the-world-said-no-to-trumps-gender-agenda
@transworld I'll take that bit of relief.
-
Member states at the annual United Nations conference on women’s rights rejected Washington’s proposal to narrow the definition of “gender” to mean “men and women.”
https://trans-express.lgbt/post/811682342031802369/the-world-said-no-to-trumps-gender-agenda
@transworld
As an Italian, I am happy that my representative participated in no action with Belgium.
But the representative also added "Italy agrees on the use of gender with the US".
This is really really sad.... -
Member states at the annual United Nations conference on women’s rights rejected Washington’s proposal to narrow the definition of “gender” to mean “men and women.”
https://trans-express.lgbt/post/811682342031802369/the-world-said-no-to-trumps-gender-agenda
I believe the #ukgovernment under the bigot #starmer is still stuck in the nineteenth century, even though the general populace are more modern in their outlook.
Come on dear Keir, grow up and stop being a clown. We stopped sex discrimination in the eighties. Do you really want to check what is in every person's underwear?
-
R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
