Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Bluesky is down today.

Bluesky is down today.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
101 Posts 35 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr

    @mcc@mastodon.social https://blacksky.community/profile/did:plc:z5wqufpi3akdylu2sqyzryqr/post/3mjmersqlu22a
    This post was posted using BlackSky during BlueSky trouble, using a OAuth authentication from my EuroSky PDS, to somebody who create his account with EuroSky during the BlueSky shutdown.

    mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mcc@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    @aeris I don't know what to tell you. It working on your machine does not cause it to work on my machine. In my own testing, right now, with the loop of "can blacksky view a post made using blacksky and hosted on a fully independent PDS", it takes about an hour for my own posts to show up in my own feed. Because Bluesky is made of many parts, it's possible the Bluesky relay was not having problems at the start of the Bluesky outage (when you did your test) but is now.

    aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

      Bluesky is down today. "Hah", I think, "since I use a self-hosted PDS for posting and Blacksky for viewing posts, I can go on using the service just fine".

      Blacksky can't show me my own posts. I can make them and they show up on my PDS, but my profile shows none more recent than last night.

      I wonder if Blacksky is coincidentally having server problems, or if Blacksky has a still-undisclosed dependency on Bluesky services. (It *does* have disclosed use of Bluesky moderation; maybe that's it.)

      palin@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      palin@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      palin@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      @mcc
      I was having problems with it too.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mosssupply@tacobelllabs.netM mosssupply@tacobelllabs.net

        @mcc I’ve heard it described as “vertically decentralized” such that if any single layer goes down then the whole thing goes down

        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mcc@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        @mosssupply that's the terminology i like

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

          @aeris I don't know what to tell you. It working on your machine does not cause it to work on my machine. In my own testing, right now, with the loop of "can blacksky view a post made using blacksky and hosted on a fully independent PDS", it takes about an hour for my own posts to show up in my own feed. Because Bluesky is made of many parts, it's possible the Bluesky relay was not having problems at the start of the Bluesky outage (when you did your test) but is now.

          aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
          aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
          aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          @mcc@mastodon.social It would probably be the same here on the Fediverse. I already report to Mastodon they have huge problem with down instance, and if a huge one stop responding, I expect many delay all over other instances, because down instance will fill all background job with dangling request
          https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/12445

          aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr

            @mcc@mastodon.social It would probably be the same here on the Fediverse. I already report to Mastodon they have huge problem with down instance, and if a huge one stop responding, I expect many delay all over other instances, because down instance will fill all background job with dangling request
            https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/12445

            aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
            aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
            aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            @mcc@mastodon.social Even on fully (technically) distributed system, a huge sub-system will generate trouble everywhere in case of trouble. See how when Amazon or Cloudflare on trouble they can impact other sub-system, even if Internet is fully distributed. Such generated trouble is from concentrated node more than not decentralized protocol.

            mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

              (And *how* does ActivityPub avert these problems? Well, ActivityPub has the "instance" abstraction. The federate-or-defederate relationships serve as a basic web of trust so some work, like moderation, doesn't have to be fully duplicated. Data is shared between instances only when a follow-relationship requires it, reducing work. Instances can still get too big and maintainers overworked, but you can fix that problem with more, smaller instances. As above, *there ARE no small Bluesky instances*)

              thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
              thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
              thisismissem@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              @mcc fwiw, blacksky have had a relay for ages, they were one of the first to set one up, so I'm not sure what lead to this situation: https://atproto.africa/

              Full list of services: https://docs.blacksky.community/list-of-our-services

              mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr

                @mcc@mastodon.social Even on fully (technically) distributed system, a huge sub-system will generate trouble everywhere in case of trouble. See how when Amazon or Cloudflare on trouble they can impact other sub-system, even if Internet is fully distributed. Such generated trouble is from concentrated node more than not decentralized protocol.

                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mcc@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                @aeris You have just put your finger on the difference between decentralized and distributed!!! Amazon is distributed but not decentralized. Bluesky is distributed but not decentralized. Fedi is both.

                aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                  This is why I believe Bluesky was never meant to be federated. To create a Bluesky "instance", like Blacksky is heroically attempting, you have to perfectly duplicate every server Bluesky runs. But Bluesky is a business operating at a loss by burning unlimited-for-now VC cash. That has always implied only a business with unlimited VC cash can create an instance. Blacksky is succeeding. Except on days where they aren't.

                  ami_angelwings@urusai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ami_angelwings@urusai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  ami_angelwings@urusai.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  @mcc I want some of that unlimited VC cash):

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                    @aeris You have just put your finger on the difference between decentralized and distributed!!! Amazon is distributed but not decentralized. Bluesky is distributed but not decentralized. Fedi is both.

                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    @mcc@mastodon.social Fedi is not both. And worse, by design, Fediverse is LESS distributed, because a down instance will stuck ALL other instance with dangling job, because it's a push protocol and not a pull one.

                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA mcc@mastodon.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT thisismissem@hachyderm.io

                      @mcc fwiw, blacksky have had a relay for ages, they were one of the first to set one up, so I'm not sure what lead to this situation: https://atproto.africa/

                      Full list of services: https://docs.blacksky.community/list-of-our-services

                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mcc@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      @thisismissem Yes, they have had a relay for over a year. But they're apparently not using it, similar to how they had an appview for about six months before they started using it. My source for this is Rudy saying, in the link upthread, that current blacksky service outages are due to the Bluesky relay going down and he is trying to "switch over to atproto.africa for some things". Implying he was not using atproto.africa for those things 24 hours ago.

                      thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • eestileib@tech.lgbtE eestileib@tech.lgbt

                        @nasser @mcc

                        I hope blacksky succeeds and gets their own complete version stood up, more options are better.

                        But it looks like there is a yardful of rakes for them to get through still.

                        nasser@merveilles.townN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nasser@merveilles.townN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nasser@merveilles.town
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        @eestileib @mcc I'm no expert but it honestly sounds like a terrible way to build a network. or at least a pretty confounding way to build a network that you intend to be federated and decentralized in any capacity...

                        eestileib@tech.lgbtE 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                          (And *how* does ActivityPub avert these problems? Well, ActivityPub has the "instance" abstraction. The federate-or-defederate relationships serve as a basic web of trust so some work, like moderation, doesn't have to be fully duplicated. Data is shared between instances only when a follow-relationship requires it, reducing work. Instances can still get too big and maintainers overworked, but you can fix that problem with more, smaller instances. As above, *there ARE no small Bluesky instances*)

                          mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mike@thecanadian.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #50

                          @mcc Not an AT protocol expert, as I always thought Actvity Pub was a better approach, but I also was always skeptical of the house that Jack built. I felt it was a bit of grift to get people feeling they we were distributed while still being survieled by the mother-ship. The crypto linked VC funding didn't do much to ease those fears. However I don't cheer lead downtime either because I know how much that sucks. Hope you're up soon.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr

                            @mcc@mastodon.social Fedi is not both. And worse, by design, Fediverse is LESS distributed, because a down instance will stuck ALL other instance with dangling job, because it's a push protocol and not a pull one.

                            aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr
                            wrote last edited by
                            #51

                            @mcc@mastodon.social Each message from my instance will generate a job to mastodon.social, because at least one ppl there follow me. If mastodon.social vanish, my own instance will start to hang for ALL message I post.

                            mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr

                              @mcc@mastodon.social Fedi is not both. And worse, by design, Fediverse is LESS distributed, because a down instance will stuck ALL other instance with dangling job, because it's a push protocol and not a pull one.

                              mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mcc@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #52

                              @aeris I don't think you know what you're talking about, and if mastodon.social goes down firefish.imirhill.fr can continue to talk to digipres.club.

                              aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                @thisismissem Yes, they have had a relay for over a year. But they're apparently not using it, similar to how they had an appview for about six months before they started using it. My source for this is Rudy saying, in the link upthread, that current blacksky service outages are due to the Bluesky relay going down and he is trying to "switch over to atproto.africa for some things". Implying he was not using atproto.africa for those things 24 hours ago.

                                thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thisismissem@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thisismissem@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #53

                                @mcc oh! Interesting, I'd just assumed they were already using it.

                                esm@wetdry.worldE 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr

                                  @mcc@mastodon.social Each message from my instance will generate a job to mastodon.social, because at least one ppl there follow me. If mastodon.social vanish, my own instance will start to hang for ALL message I post.

                                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mcc@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #54

                                  @aeris I do not believe this is true and if it does it indicates some kind of really weird problem with your instance specifically.

                                  aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                    @aeris I don't think you know what you're talking about, and if mastodon.social goes down firefish.imirhill.fr can continue to talk to digipres.club.

                                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #55

                                    @mcc@mastodon.social No. Or with huge delay. Because each of my message will generate a background job to mastodon.social, leading to queue overflow over time and more and more lag even for digipres.club delivery.

                                    jeromechoo@masto.aiJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                      TLDR

                                      1. My definition of "P2P" or "Federated" is that if server A goes down, servers B and C can still talk to each other.

                                      2. Bluesky/"Atmosphere" fails at this because Blacksky (B) requires Bluesky (A) to talk to me (C).

                                      3. In order for Blacksky to avert this, they have to do something unreasonable and expensive.

                                      4. Blacksky someday *will* do this, but will depend heavily on massively overworking Rudy and a few other people. This may someday fail.

                                      5. ActivityPub has problems, but not these

                                      javascript@app.wafrn.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      javascript@app.wafrn.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      javascript@app.wafrn.net
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #56

                                      @mcc@mastodon.social

                                      But if the problem is the relay couldn't they just use the microcosm.blue relays and call it a day ?? They are compatible with the original ones

                                      And didn't Blacksky also ran their own relay at atproto.africa ??

                                      mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                        @aeris I do not believe this is true and if it does it indicates some kind of really weird problem with your instance specifically.

                                        aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aeris@firefish.imirhil.fr
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #57

                                        @mcc@mastodon.social No, it's the trouble with the push design of ActivityPub.

                                        aeris@firefish.imirhil.frA scatty_hannah@federation.networkS 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • javascript@app.wafrn.netJ javascript@app.wafrn.net

                                          @mcc@mastodon.social

                                          But if the problem is the relay couldn't they just use the microcosm.blue relays and call it a day ?? They are compatible with the original ones

                                          And didn't Blacksky also ran their own relay at atproto.africa ??

                                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mcc@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #58

                                          @javascript Before I attempt to reply to this, please clarify whether read the post I posted above.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Rudolph Fraser. (@rude1.blacksky.team)

                                          Even their relay seems down(?) Trying to switch some things to use atproto.africa https://atproto.africa

                                          favicon

                                          Bluesky Social (bsky.app)

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Rudolph Fraser. (@rude1.blacksky.team)

                                          Even their relay seems down(?) Trying to switch some things to use atproto.africa https://atproto.africa

                                          favicon

                                          Blacksky (blacksky.community)

                                          Yes, they've been running atproto.africa since last year. But are they *using* it?

                                          javascript@app.wafrn.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups