You gave a stranger with no soul and no skin in the game the keys to everything you own.

[kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@pgcd some people are looking for self-expression (truth as you understand it, questions, unique views, ideas that someone else won't understand unless they are open to you), others for a successful post in terms of attention (AI, dog-piling, takes they know are false but will get approval from the crowd, false accusations, etc.)

[varx@infosec.exchange]

@jpteti @beyondmachines1 Don't trust Pangram so easily. I've seen it get stuff dead wrong (with "high confidence", no less).

But yes, this looks slop-ish.

[lackthereof@beige.party]

@fh0
In my experience at work, that happens sometimes! But it's outnumbered easily 3:1 by cases where it goes down rabbit holes based on fundamentally wrong starting assumptions.

If the LLM bug-triage bot at work says one more time "oh yeah this kernel panic issue is clearly due to a problem in this testing shell script" I STG I will scream.
@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1

[hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com]

@davecb Please don’t waste your time engaging with this person who creates alternative accounts faster than people can rightfully block them. They’re a shit-stirrer, they know it and I expect they enjoy it as well.

[flashmobofone@mstdn.social]

@beyondmachines1 And that stranger does a shitty job to boot.

[jaseg@chaos.social]

@siderea lol

[womble@infosec.exchange]

@VerenaRupp the addiction to food, clothing, and shelter is very strong.

[yesterzine@topspicy.social]

@beyondmachines1 and just wait until they start charging what it actually costs.

[octorine@fosstodon.org]

@lackthereof @fh0 @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 Yeah. Whenever I ask AI to review anything it finds all kinds of issues, 90% of which are completely made up.

[astrid@tiny.tilde.website]

@beyondmachines1 i find it so fuckin weird that all the anti-ai posting is usually (at the very least) put through the ai copyeditor with the punchiness dialled up to 11.

[davecb@hachyderm.io]

@hypolite
Agreed.
I'm speaking to its readers (:-))

And I say "it" because this is probably a personality donated to us by the Internet Research Agency .. in St Petersburg.

[feral_3d@mastodon.social]

@beyondmachines1 pretty much

[pafurijaz@mastodon.social]

@beyondmachines1 The worst part of it all is the access to your work and patents, basically you risk finding someone making the exact same things, because you've already fed in, tweaked, and fixed every mistake by training an AI, and you even paid to do it. At least with an employee you could drag him to court if he spilled your confidential info and patents, on top of putting him on bread and water if he screwed up the job, and whipping him when he wasn't working.

[blf_tpe@phpc.social]

@beyondmachines1 @_elena AI is just a tool! For my company I use codex one-time to write python automation scripts on the dev database, then scripts can run by themselves in prod and ai doesn’t access data. A small local agent with Hermes Agent tracks errors and problems. The cost is minimum (20usd/month), maintenance is straightforward, local ai runs from a base Mac mini (lol). We save lots of time that can be reemployed elsewhere.

[curtadams@urbanists.social]

@pafurijaz @beyondmachines1 The way AI works, if you have a trade secret it has processed and somebody asks that AI a question related to your secret, it's going to barf up your secret - and the person questioning won't even know they're in violation.

Even worse, if the AI firm goes belly-up, all their scraped data will be part of the assets up for bid.

So, two different ways of near-guaranteed exposure.

[mikalai@privacysafe.social]

@jaseg @pgcd @kepeken
Slop has no sunbtance. This does.

[kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@rockgecko_dev @dzwiedziu @jaseg @pgcd good luck finding a control group sample of human-written "linked in" posts...

[drsuzanne@disabled.social]

@jaseg @siderea@universeodon.com this, is always the greatest response to a troll. (This person is a therapist. )

[brettm@swarm.coiloptic.org]

CC: @dzwiedziu@mastodon.social @jaseg@chaos.social @kepeken@mastodon.gamedev.place @pgcd@mastodon.online @rockgecko_dev@aus.social

An AI detector tool recently decided that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was written by AI

[sebastiansolidwork@mastodon.social]

@beyondmachines1 And it's not a usual subscription like for Netflix.
One way or the other it is, or will become, pay-per-use.
The AI providers have nothing to give away for free in long-term.