Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

[tutanota@mastodon.social]

Protecting your safety online starts here: https://tuta.com/blog/minimum-password-length

[brainsuxx666@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota It's not about a safer internet it`s about collecting more data from us.

[pouakai@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota
For average user, a password manager will be necessary if every pwsd is so long.

Passkey is a good alternative, but how many service providers allow it is an issue.

[gonun13@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Just a note. Age verification is not mutually exclusive to everything that is on the safer column. If the real world has age requirements in some operations, it's acceptable that the digital world also has the same. Making the Internet lawless is what drives attacks on other liberties.

[xela@troet.cafe]

@Tutanota how about "content moderation by humans"? Seems important to me when it comes to any platform/software, where harassment could happen.

[martranslations@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Hear, hear!

[joostvb@mastodon.green]

@Tutanota true! And maybe also: Properly trained human community managers, moderation teams, dispute resolution perssonel, ... ?

[menos@todon.eu]

@Pouakai @Tutanota Yes, if you wanted to avoid credential stuffing attacks (i.e. taking the password from that poorly secured forum you were a member of to open your email account and pretty much everything else connected to you) a password manager has already been necessary for many years.

[andrtrio@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota this way of thinking should become mainstream, but unfortunately we are far behind that in public debates.

[tcatinreality@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota

You missed the most important one.

A safe internet require distributed and transparent ownership, not tight control by secretive for-profit companies.

Without that, none of the rest matters.

[irisnk@dorm.social]

@fiore@brain.worm.pink look at this shit they got the basic ass goleador gummy gradient vro

[irisnk@dorm.social]

@fiore@brain.worm.pink sorry yr my only italian oomf only you would get it

[fedihacker@masto.es]

@Tutanota Without tracking and data collection recommendation algorithms would not work. And that's safer. Yes.

[gbsills@social.vivaldi.net]

@Tutanota The graphic is correct for email. The Internet is more than just email.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@gonun13 @Tutanota

This what you think is also an attack on my liberty to get legal available NSFW stuff. And on the safety on jung people will be worse with age verification than else. You have to get safe NSFW stuff than disallowing that completely.

[yugthebug@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota and moderation for public communities, 4chan isnt exactly safe

[fiore@brain.worm.pink]

@irisnk@dorm.social @Tutanota@mastodon.social yumy ..

[dynom@toot.community]

@Tutanota short slogans are nice for marketing.

The Internet is not safer for victims of harassment, when the attackers enjoy anonymity and no accountability because of it.

Platforms can't abide by laws, if they can't figure out if their users are legally (of age) visiting.

Brevity isn't winning any arguments.

[guillotine_jones@beige.party]

@Tutanota
Safe internet or surveillance internet?
The choice is ours, unless governments take it away.

[abody@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Does your solution support open standards like POP/IMAP, allowing the end users to encrypt/decrypt/verify their messages EXTERNALLY? If it does not, please stop using the word "safe" and the name of your product in the same sentence.