Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Since the Freakonomics and Search Engine podcasts both ran (the same) 2-part episode on autonomous vehicles, that's on my mind.

Since the Freakonomics and Search Engine podcasts both ran (the same) 2-part episode on autonomous vehicles, that's on my mind.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    paco@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Since the Freakonomics and Search Engine podcasts both ran (the same) 2-part episode on autonomous vehicles, that's on my mind.

    First, in 2 episodes, the word privacy literally didn't get said. Nobody talks about what happens when a silicon valley tech company knows all your movements down to the minute and the GPS coordinate. Maybe Uber/Lyft moved the overton window on that already.

    Second, I can imagine a bunch of horrible scenarios between ICE and an autonomous taxi company like Waymo or Zoox. Imagine DHS getting a real-time data feed of journeys. They see a journey for someone they want to detain. They contact the driverless taxi company and

    • (a) order them to change the destination: take the passenger to a place where ICE agents are waiting to apprehend them
    • (b) order them to stop the taxi and not unlock the doors, so the passenger cannot get out
    • (c) If (b) is unlikely, just drive on a fast road too fast for a passenger to safely bail out until law enforcement can arrive

    There are few, if any, laws protecting us passenger-citizens from this kind of abuse. All we have are pinky swears from the tech companies and governments. In the year 2026, how much do we trust those pinky swears?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups