Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. There’s a good case for this

There’s a good case for this

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • retech@defcon.socialR retech@defcon.social

    @glnfld @inthehands @Nicovel0 That sucks. I had no idea.

    Yet another one.

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    glnfld@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #43

    @retech @inthehands @Nicovel0 It's been speculated on for almost a decade now, but the recent releases essentially confirmed it. This article summarizes everything from pre-"The Files" release if you want to learn more. https://christine-negroni.medium.com/jeffrey-epstein-dean-kamen-connection-through-aviation-influencer-bb0e767dbfcf

    There's still no legal proof, but for anyone capable of critical thought the evidence is extremely damning.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

      The micromobility revolution was •right there• 25 years ago, if only we’d been willing to go for it, if only we’d been able to see it. That’s…what, 15? 20? years head start on how it’s unfolded.

      That’s a head start I really wish we’d had on the current climate disaster that’s unfolding. But no, we were too busy making fun of it for being nerdy.

      inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
      inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
      inthehands@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #44

      To be clear: the Segway as released was •not• a very good product. But it was not a worse product than, say, the Apple-1, which was also clumsy, nerdy, impractical, expensive. ($3400 in today’s money and it didn’t even have a keyboard!)

      Yet in the latter case the response was “This is the future! Let’s do this! Let’s figure it out!” And with the Segway, the response was “How mockable, nobody should ever try to build anything like this ever again!”

      A crumb went down the wrong way with micromobility in 2001, and I’m not willing to lay that entire at the feet of one product’s marketing team. We collectively screwed up.

      ETA: This •started• as a thread about e-bikes and e-scooters; scroll up

      monniauxd@social.sciences.reM lackthereof@beige.partyL matthew@opinuendo.comM annehargreaves@ioc.exchangeA thomasjwebb@mastodon.socialT 9 Replies Last reply
      0
      • grechaw@sfba.socialG grechaw@sfba.social

        @inthehands meanwhile/and ebikes are a revolution going on big-time all around us

        inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
        inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
        inthehands@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #45

        @grechaw
        That is where the thread started, yes

        grechaw@sfba.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

          To be clear: the Segway as released was •not• a very good product. But it was not a worse product than, say, the Apple-1, which was also clumsy, nerdy, impractical, expensive. ($3400 in today’s money and it didn’t even have a keyboard!)

          Yet in the latter case the response was “This is the future! Let’s do this! Let’s figure it out!” And with the Segway, the response was “How mockable, nobody should ever try to build anything like this ever again!”

          A crumb went down the wrong way with micromobility in 2001, and I’m not willing to lay that entire at the feet of one product’s marketing team. We collectively screwed up.

          ETA: This •started• as a thread about e-bikes and e-scooters; scroll up

          monniauxd@social.sciences.reM This user is from outside of this forum
          monniauxd@social.sciences.reM This user is from outside of this forum
          monniauxd@social.sciences.re
          wrote last edited by
          #46

          @inthehands Maybe the overhype? I recall they tried to build suspense for a long while, with hyperbolic claims of a revolutionary invention, and then they unveiled an expense, weighty, bulky device.

          inthehands@hachyderm.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • monniauxd@social.sciences.reM monniauxd@social.sciences.re

            @inthehands Maybe the overhype? I recall they tried to build suspense for a long while, with hyperbolic claims of a revolutionary invention, and then they unveiled an expense, weighty, bulky device.

            inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
            inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
            inthehands@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #47

            @MonniauxD I repeat myself:

            ••• I’m not willing to lay that entire at the feet of one product’s marketing team. We collectively screwed up. •••

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

              …I’m asking us to pause all of that entrenched reaction, and think about why our reaction was:

              “What a bad product! How douchy! Ha ha!”

              …instead of what was in hindsight probably a much better reaction:

              “Oh, what a good idea for a product •direction•! All-electric human-sized transportation…huh, that might just change the world! If we can improve on this very clumsy first attempt at execution….”

              benedictc@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
              benedictc@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
              benedictc@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #48

              @inthehands the direction still has some significant problems: useful in cities but less so else where and only accessible to some people. Tech tends to favour groups unaffected by problems like that. I reckon that some of the negative reactions comes from people clocking that the product is borne of a vision of the world that doesn’t include them.

              accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                @grechaw
                That is where the thread started, yes

                grechaw@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grechaw@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grechaw@sfba.social
                wrote last edited by
                #49

                @inthehands erg. Rtfm, Charles .

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                  …I’m asking us to pause all of that entrenched reaction, and think about why our reaction was:

                  “What a bad product! How douchy! Ha ha!”

                  …instead of what was in hindsight probably a much better reaction:

                  “Oh, what a good idea for a product •direction•! All-electric human-sized transportation…huh, that might just change the world! If we can improve on this very clumsy first attempt at execution….”

                  bluedot@left-bank.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bluedot@left-bank.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bluedot@left-bank.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #50

                  @inthehands

                  I'd certainly be in the market for something that helps me move around on uneven ground while preventing falls.

                  I don't actually expect the device to warn me away from the edge of a cliff, though that might be nice.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social

                    @inthehands I would say the real problem is that our society is hard wired to think that anything that is in any way whatsoever associated with "laziness" in any form whether right or wrong is pure, unadulterated evil. Anyone who in any way whatsoever desires to do a thing that is considered by others to be lazy is evil and bad.

                    It's a complete load, but society needs us to think of "lazy" as "useless" and "a drain on society."

                    Aka work until you hurt and then die.

                    nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #51

                    @inthehands I have to add on to this, the more I think about it, this actually predates even capitalism.

                    Humans have, for ages and ages been trained from birth to think of anything that may be perceived as laziness as actually evil. In some cases I mean that's quite literal even. Actually "evil" religiously/etc. To be hated and to be punished.

                    It also carries over to other things like hating on disabilities and etc.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                      To be clear: the Segway as released was •not• a very good product. But it was not a worse product than, say, the Apple-1, which was also clumsy, nerdy, impractical, expensive. ($3400 in today’s money and it didn’t even have a keyboard!)

                      Yet in the latter case the response was “This is the future! Let’s do this! Let’s figure it out!” And with the Segway, the response was “How mockable, nobody should ever try to build anything like this ever again!”

                      A crumb went down the wrong way with micromobility in 2001, and I’m not willing to lay that entire at the feet of one product’s marketing team. We collectively screwed up.

                      ETA: This •started• as a thread about e-bikes and e-scooters; scroll up

                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lackthereof@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #52

                      @inthehands
                      But isn't it back with those little electric razor-type scooters? Same thing functionally but inline wheels.

                      inthehands@hachyderm.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lackthereof@beige.partyL lackthereof@beige.party

                        @inthehands
                        But isn't it back with those little electric razor-type scooters? Same thing functionally but inline wheels.

                        inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                        inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                        inthehands@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #53

                        @lackthereof
                        That’s what the thread is specifically about; scroll up

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                          To be clear: the Segway as released was •not• a very good product. But it was not a worse product than, say, the Apple-1, which was also clumsy, nerdy, impractical, expensive. ($3400 in today’s money and it didn’t even have a keyboard!)

                          Yet in the latter case the response was “This is the future! Let’s do this! Let’s figure it out!” And with the Segway, the response was “How mockable, nobody should ever try to build anything like this ever again!”

                          A crumb went down the wrong way with micromobility in 2001, and I’m not willing to lay that entire at the feet of one product’s marketing team. We collectively screwed up.

                          ETA: This •started• as a thread about e-bikes and e-scooters; scroll up

                          matthew@opinuendo.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                          matthew@opinuendo.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                          matthew@opinuendo.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #54

                          @inthehands I think e-bikes took that mantle. It does require more from the user, but wasn't a conceptual bridge too far

                          inthehands@hachyderm.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                            (I also wonder how much social countermarketing petrochem slipped in to kill it. If that story’s known, it’s not known to me.)

                            mattly@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mattly@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mattly@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #55

                            @inthehands I bet there’s a direct line between this and the megatrucks we have today

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • matthew@opinuendo.comM matthew@opinuendo.com

                              @inthehands I think e-bikes took that mantle. It does require more from the user, but wasn't a conceptual bridge too far

                              inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                              inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                              inthehands@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #56

                              @matthew That’s where the thread started

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                                I periodically think about the hype around the Segway, how luminary types were over the moon for it in private demos but then the general public decided it was uncool, and think maybe actually the luminaries had it right and it’s the public that biffed it.

                                donaldball@triangletoot.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                donaldball@triangletoot.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                donaldball@triangletoot.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #57

                                @inthehands I really don’t think tepid or even vaguely hostile reactions to the Segway slowed the micromobility revolution. I think battery tech evolution and production capacity are more likely.

                                inthehands@hachyderm.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                                  To be clear: the Segway as released was •not• a very good product. But it was not a worse product than, say, the Apple-1, which was also clumsy, nerdy, impractical, expensive. ($3400 in today’s money and it didn’t even have a keyboard!)

                                  Yet in the latter case the response was “This is the future! Let’s do this! Let’s figure it out!” And with the Segway, the response was “How mockable, nobody should ever try to build anything like this ever again!”

                                  A crumb went down the wrong way with micromobility in 2001, and I’m not willing to lay that entire at the feet of one product’s marketing team. We collectively screwed up.

                                  ETA: This •started• as a thread about e-bikes and e-scooters; scroll up

                                  annehargreaves@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  annehargreaves@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  annehargreaves@ioc.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #58

                                  @inthehands Thing was, not many people hurt themselves on the Apple.

                                  inthehands@hachyderm.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                  • donaldball@triangletoot.partyD donaldball@triangletoot.party

                                    @inthehands I really don’t think tepid or even vaguely hostile reactions to the Segway slowed the micromobility revolution. I think battery tech evolution and production capacity are more likely.

                                    inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    inthehands@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #59

                                    @donaldball

                                    This may well be the case — though I do suspect that tech might have advanced faster if investors & the public believed in the applications sooner

                                    donaldball@triangletoot.partyD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G glnfld@mastodon.social

                                      @retech @inthehands @Nicovel0 It's been speculated on for almost a decade now, but the recent releases essentially confirmed it. This article summarizes everything from pre-"The Files" release if you want to learn more. https://christine-negroni.medium.com/jeffrey-epstein-dean-kamen-connection-through-aviation-influencer-bb0e767dbfcf

                                      There's still no legal proof, but for anyone capable of critical thought the evidence is extremely damning.

                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      glnfld@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #60

                                      @retech @inthehands @Nicovel0 I guess I should clarify that the Epstein file releases included pictures of Kamen on Epstein's island with Epstein (and Richard Branson), and there is at least one photo with a woman in an inexcusable position.

                                      Epstein also discussed in his emails people he knew who, as guests of Kamen, attended events for Kamen's youth robotics org.

                                      For all the good Kamen did for the world with his intentions, it's well past time to separate the man from his work.

                                      retech@defcon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • annehargreaves@ioc.exchangeA annehargreaves@ioc.exchange

                                        @inthehands Thing was, not many people hurt themselves on the Apple.

                                        inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        inthehands@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        inthehands@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #61

                                        @annehargreaves
                                        Yet the high injury rates from class 3 e-bikes have not slowed their adoption. And speaking of injuries…have you ever heard about cars?

                                        annehargreaves@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                                          …I’m asking us to pause all of that entrenched reaction, and think about why our reaction was:

                                          “What a bad product! How douchy! Ha ha!”

                                          …instead of what was in hindsight probably a much better reaction:

                                          “Oh, what a good idea for a product •direction•! All-electric human-sized transportation…huh, that might just change the world! If we can improve on this very clumsy first attempt at execution….”

                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          glnfld@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #62

                                          @inthehands I think this is a good thought exercise, and helpful to reflect on when considering new products.

                                          Also worth mentioning that a lot of Kamen's messaging at the time was along these lines, that electrified personal transportation could change the world in substantial ways, it just happened that Segway was the *only* version in existence.

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups