Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. To anyone who thinks there is a systemd root privilege escalation vulnerability discovered recently.

To anyone who thinks there is a systemd root privilege escalation vulnerability discovered recently.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fun@berkeley.edu.plF This user is from outside of this forum
    fun@berkeley.edu.plF This user is from outside of this forum
    fun@berkeley.edu.pl
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    To anyone who thinks there is a systemd root privilege escalation vulnerability discovered recently. Please read the technical details instead of listening to idiots on youtube and reddit.

    https://cdn2.qualys.com/advisory/2026/03/17/snap-confine-systemd-tmpfiles.txt

    Because, if you actually read the technical details of this vulnerability, you'll know that it is a *snapd* vulnerability (which involved misconfiguration in systemd-tmpfiles). It is *NOT* a systemd vulnerability, and anyone who's telling you the opposite does not have a single idea what they're talking about.

    I am specifically looking at that complete idiot on youtube who keeps bringing up things completely out of context, is a literal nazi, and whose name starts with L.

    Please, don't listen to idiots who don't know anything about the subject they're bringing up.
    fun@berkeley.edu.plF 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
    • fun@berkeley.edu.plF fun@berkeley.edu.pl
      To anyone who thinks there is a systemd root privilege escalation vulnerability discovered recently. Please read the technical details instead of listening to idiots on youtube and reddit.

      https://cdn2.qualys.com/advisory/2026/03/17/snap-confine-systemd-tmpfiles.txt

      Because, if you actually read the technical details of this vulnerability, you'll know that it is a *snapd* vulnerability (which involved misconfiguration in systemd-tmpfiles). It is *NOT* a systemd vulnerability, and anyone who's telling you the opposite does not have a single idea what they're talking about.

      I am specifically looking at that complete idiot on youtube who keeps bringing up things completely out of context, is a literal nazi, and whose name starts with L.

      Please, don't listen to idiots who don't know anything about the subject they're bringing up.
      fun@berkeley.edu.plF This user is from outside of this forum
      fun@berkeley.edu.plF This user is from outside of this forum
      fun@berkeley.edu.pl
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      Surprise surprise, when I lookup "systemd root vulnerability" on youtube, all I see is that idiot whose name starts with L.
      fun@berkeley.edu.plF 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • fun@berkeley.edu.plF fun@berkeley.edu.pl
        Surprise surprise, when I lookup "systemd root vulnerability" on youtube, all I see is that idiot whose name starts with L.
        fun@berkeley.edu.plF This user is from outside of this forum
        fun@berkeley.edu.plF This user is from outside of this forum
        fun@berkeley.edu.pl
        wrote last edited by
        #3
        Quickly skimmed through Lunduke's video, I gotta say he's terrible at actually sharing real news.

        All he shows is devuan's tweet, *HIS* tweet, and a small part of the summary blog post brought completely out of context (which doesn't even mention systemd). Not very convincing overall. Then he's talking about age verification and doing stupid irrelevant comments all over the place.
        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups