Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. When all of this is “over”, it's not going to be good enough to say “We shouldn't have let that happen.

When all of this is “over”, it's not going to be good enough to say “We shouldn't have let that happen.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
11 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sean@scoat.esS This user is from outside of this forum
    sean@scoat.esS This user is from outside of this forum
    sean@scoat.es
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    When all of this is “over”, it's not going to be good enough to say “We shouldn't have let that happen. It'll be better now.” That's just lying to yourselves and everyone else for 4 years.

    The only acceptable outcome from a world power who has gone this far off the rails is “we've made it so that it *can’t* happen again.”

    pl@cosocial.caP jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ brammm@phpc.socialB 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • sean@scoat.esS sean@scoat.es

      When all of this is “over”, it's not going to be good enough to say “We shouldn't have let that happen. It'll be better now.” That's just lying to yourselves and everyone else for 4 years.

      The only acceptable outcome from a world power who has gone this far off the rails is “we've made it so that it *can’t* happen again.”

      pl@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
      pl@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
      pl@cosocial.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @sean "some day everyone will have always been against this"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sean@scoat.esS sean@scoat.es

        When all of this is “over”, it's not going to be good enough to say “We shouldn't have let that happen. It'll be better now.” That's just lying to yourselves and everyone else for 4 years.

        The only acceptable outcome from a world power who has gone this far off the rails is “we've made it so that it *can’t* happen again.”

        jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jrf_nl@phpc.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @sean That's what everyone thought after WWII and well, you already stated what's happening...

        sean@scoat.esS brammm@phpc.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ jrf_nl@phpc.social

          @sean That's what everyone thought after WWII and well, you already stated what's happening...

          sean@scoat.esS This user is from outside of this forum
          sean@scoat.esS This user is from outside of this forum
          sean@scoat.es
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @jrf_nl I think it's pretty hard to reach ~80 years into the future. I'd be pretty happy if we could collectively come up with the will to at least expect it to stick.

          ramsey@phpc.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sean@scoat.esS sean@scoat.es

            @jrf_nl I think it's pretty hard to reach ~80 years into the future. I'd be pretty happy if we could collectively come up with the will to at least expect it to stick.

            ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            ramsey@phpc.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @sean @jrf_nl Some of that is because *we* were the world power who made all that happen in the wake of WWII, while also quietly excusing ourselves from the requirements. Like we have a permanent position on the UN Security Council and can unilaterally veto any decisions. We also chose not to be party to the ICJ, among other things (it’s arguably against our Constitution to recognize the ICJ, but we can always change the Constitution).

            jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ nick@sloan.hostN 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • ramsey@phpc.socialR ramsey@phpc.social

              @sean @jrf_nl Some of that is because *we* were the world power who made all that happen in the wake of WWII, while also quietly excusing ourselves from the requirements. Like we have a permanent position on the UN Security Council and can unilaterally veto any decisions. We also chose not to be party to the ICJ, among other things (it’s arguably against our Constitution to recognize the ICJ, but we can always change the Constitution).

              jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jrf_nl@phpc.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @ramsey @sean If you do, please also get rid of the "Invasion law".

              The US has (in law only) been at war with The Netherlands since 2002....

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act

              ramsey@phpc.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ jrf_nl@phpc.social

                @ramsey @sean If you do, please also get rid of the "Invasion law".

                The US has (in law only) been at war with The Netherlands since 2002....

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act

                ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                ramsey@phpc.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @jrf_nl @sean I’m well aware of the “invasion law.” 😞

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ramsey@phpc.socialR ramsey@phpc.social

                  @sean @jrf_nl Some of that is because *we* were the world power who made all that happen in the wake of WWII, while also quietly excusing ourselves from the requirements. Like we have a permanent position on the UN Security Council and can unilaterally veto any decisions. We also chose not to be party to the ICJ, among other things (it’s arguably against our Constitution to recognize the ICJ, but we can always change the Constitution).

                  nick@sloan.hostN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nick@sloan.hostN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nick@sloan.host
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @ramsey @sean @jrf_nl If by “we can always change the constitution” you mean “we can never change the constitution.”

                  ramsey@phpc.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nick@sloan.hostN nick@sloan.host

                    @ramsey @sean @jrf_nl If by “we can always change the constitution” you mean “we can never change the constitution.”

                    ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ramsey@phpc.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @nick @sean @jrf_nl Nonsense. The last amendment was ratified in…1992.

                    It had only been proposed a mere…202 years and 223 days earlier.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sean@scoat.esS sean@scoat.es

                      When all of this is “over”, it's not going to be good enough to say “We shouldn't have let that happen. It'll be better now.” That's just lying to yourselves and everyone else for 4 years.

                      The only acceptable outcome from a world power who has gone this far off the rails is “we've made it so that it *can’t* happen again.”

                      brammm@phpc.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brammm@phpc.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brammm@phpc.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @sean https://youtu.be/f5r9Qepsi9E?t=1294

                      Robert Evans' take really resonated with me.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jrf_nl@phpc.socialJ jrf_nl@phpc.social

                        @sean That's what everyone thought after WWII and well, you already stated what's happening...

                        brammm@phpc.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        brammm@phpc.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        brammm@phpc.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @jrf_nl @sean Catching up on my WWI and WWII history, I was amazed to learn how poorly the fallout of WWI was handled. How soon after WWI the DAP (which later became Hitler's NSDAP) was formed, how quickly antisemitism, German nationalism exploded... All directly resulting in an unavoidable WWII... When this is "over", there needs to be a clear sign "we will never stand for this again", there need to be consequences, there needs to be punishment.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups