Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

#copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
copyfail
36 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • freya@social.highenergymagic.netF freya@social.highenergymagic.net

    @whitequark would containers using gVisor as a container runtime solve for this?

    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
    whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @freya in theory yes, in practice i couldn't get gVisor to work with podman and i don't trust dockerd any more than Linux

    freya@social.highenergymagic.netF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

      #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
      whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      not specifically that bug, just the bug class i was worried about for a while

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

        @freya in theory yes, in practice i couldn't get gVisor to work with podman and i don't trust dockerd any more than Linux

        freya@social.highenergymagic.netF This user is from outside of this forum
        freya@social.highenergymagic.netF This user is from outside of this forum
        freya@social.highenergymagic.net
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @whitequark oh really! podman doesn't have the --runtime=runsc option? why not trusting docker, can I ask?

        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW starchturrets@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

          #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

          janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janl@narrativ.es
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @whitequark do you plan to support running workers on wondows hosts? And is there anything we can do to help?

          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • freya@social.highenergymagic.netF freya@social.highenergymagic.net

            @whitequark oh really! podman doesn't have the --runtime=runsc option? why not trusting docker, can I ask?

            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
            whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @freya it does, gvisor just crashes for reasons i could not triage in reasonable time

            rootful dockerd, well, is a big attack surface. rootless dockerd didn't provide some of the functionality i needed

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • janl@narrativ.esJ janl@narrativ.es

              @whitequark do you plan to support running workers on wondows hosts? And is there anything we can do to help?

              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
              whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @janl yes (already underway) and uh want to buy me a motherboard?

              alex@feed.yopp.meA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

                tisba@ruby.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                tisba@ruby.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                tisba@ruby.social
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @whitequark MicroVMs sound like a good fit I think. It’s somewhere on my list of things to look into…

                Sebastian Cohnen (@tisba@ruby.social)

                Copy Fail (https://copy.fail/, CVE-2026-31431) is a good reminder why I don’t want to run CI jobs only in containers. It would be great to get some momentum to https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-actions-feature-requests/issues/4 (microVMs for forgejo actions). At least on bare metal (or nested VMs with nested KVM) this would make things a lot safer. It would also simplify the usage of containers/docker in CI jobs without compromising security, which is kind of a pain with Codeberg Action currently. #security

                favicon

                Ruby.social (ruby.social)

                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tisba@ruby.socialT tisba@ruby.social

                  @whitequark MicroVMs sound like a good fit I think. It’s somewhere on my list of things to look into…

                  Sebastian Cohnen (@tisba@ruby.social)

                  Copy Fail (https://copy.fail/, CVE-2026-31431) is a good reminder why I don’t want to run CI jobs only in containers. It would be great to get some momentum to https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-actions-feature-requests/issues/4 (microVMs for forgejo actions). At least on bare metal (or nested VMs with nested KVM) this would make things a lot safer. It would also simplify the usage of containers/docker in CI jobs without compromising security, which is kind of a pain with Codeberg Action currently. #security

                  favicon

                  Ruby.social (ruby.social)

                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @tisba yep, already on it

                  tisba@ruby.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                    @tisba yep, already on it

                    tisba@ruby.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tisba@ruby.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tisba@ruby.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @whitequark that’s awesome! 🤩

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • freya@social.highenergymagic.netF freya@social.highenergymagic.net

                      @whitequark oh really! podman doesn't have the --runtime=runsc option? why not trusting docker, can I ask?

                      starchturrets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      starchturrets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      starchturrets@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @freya @whitequark ime podman with the socket + gvisor is buggy af with forgejo actions.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                        #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

                        thejpster@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thejpster@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thejpster@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @whitequark copy-on-write shallow clones of VMs works great for CI. I was doing it back in 2011 or so.

                        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • thejpster@hachyderm.ioT thejpster@hachyderm.io

                          @whitequark copy-on-write shallow clones of VMs works great for CI. I was doing it back in 2011 or so.

                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @thejpster yep, the plan is to do something like that with microVMs (or the closest approximation if the obvious solution is non-viable)

                          thejpster@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                            #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

                            wren6991@types.plW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wren6991@types.plW This user is from outside of this forum
                            wren6991@types.pl
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @whitequark containers: the convenience of a VM and the security of rawdogging userspace 😎

                            whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                              #copyfail is why the Forgejo Actions runner service i'm setting up will be using kvm and single shot VMs rather than containers

                              chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC This user is from outside of this forum
                              chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC This user is from outside of this forum
                              chaos@gts.schizofucked.monster
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @whitequark dunno what copyfail is but we're gonna end up doing the same
                              currently working on migration to our alpine+libvirt+scripts hypervisor os on main server specifically to allow for stuff like this
                              eventually plan to make a thing to let us do docker compose style services, but as a full VM per service or a container runtime if required

                              chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                                @thejpster yep, the plan is to do something like that with microVMs (or the closest approximation if the obvious solution is non-viable)

                                thejpster@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thejpster@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                thejpster@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                @whitequark I suspect you won't be using VMware vSphere and the VMware Perl SDK though 😕

                                whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW autumnwinds@mathstodon.xyzA 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW whitequark@social.treehouse.systems

                                  @janl yes (already underway) and uh want to buy me a motherboard?

                                  alex@feed.yopp.meA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alex@feed.yopp.meA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alex@feed.yopp.me
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @whitequark I have my old box collecting dust while waiting for a crazy enough buyer. Im slowly lowering price, but probably it’s not going to be sold in next few months.

                                  If it’s any use for you in meantime, I can give you direct access to bcm webui so you can do whatever you like with it 🙂

                                  We can figure out how much of heads up you need in case someone would be willing to buy it. And I have second low power box that can be used for backups

                                  EPYC 7551P (1gen, 32C/64T) on Gigabyte MZ01-CE1 (with browser based KVM)
                                  RAM 256G: 8× 32G M393A4K40BB2-CTD DDR4-2666
                                  NVME 2T: 1× WD Black SN850X
                                  HDD 12T: 4× 3TB HGST Ultrastar 7K300

                                  • 2× Tesla P40 (if you are in a mood for messing with sharing gpu with workers)
                                  whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC chaos@gts.schizofucked.monster

                                    @whitequark dunno what copyfail is but we're gonna end up doing the same
                                    currently working on migration to our alpine+libvirt+scripts hypervisor os on main server specifically to allow for stuff like this
                                    eventually plan to make a thing to let us do docker compose style services, but as a full VM per service or a container runtime if required

                                    chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    chaos@gts.schizofucked.monster
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @whitequark hoping there is a way to speed up vm launch time though, if you have any resources that might be useful, feel free to send us, medical issues are making it almost impossible for us to focus enough to find resources on how to best do this kinda thing securely and decently

                                    while we'd love to use xcp-ng, the old kernel / xen kinda limits its use on little guys (fucked cpu freq scaling), and proxmox requires so much host configuration for our weird setups which we'd rather avoid, so making our own embedded style alpine distro with A/B boot specifically for this

                                    whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • wren6991@types.plW wren6991@types.pl

                                      @whitequark containers: the convenience of a VM and the security of rawdogging userspace 😎

                                      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @wren6991 yep

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC chaos@gts.schizofucked.monster

                                        @whitequark hoping there is a way to speed up vm launch time though, if you have any resources that might be useful, feel free to send us, medical issues are making it almost impossible for us to focus enough to find resources on how to best do this kinda thing securely and decently

                                        while we'd love to use xcp-ng, the old kernel / xen kinda limits its use on little guys (fucked cpu freq scaling), and proxmox requires so much host configuration for our weird setups which we'd rather avoid, so making our own embedded style alpine distro with A/B boot specifically for this

                                        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @chaos firecracker or crosvm is the current plan but i'm not recommending either until i get actual operational experience

                                        chaos@gts.schizofucked.monsterC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • thejpster@hachyderm.ioT thejpster@hachyderm.io

                                          @whitequark I suspect you won't be using VMware vSphere and the VMware Perl SDK though 😕

                                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systemsW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          whitequark@social.treehouse.systems
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @thejpster mercifully, no

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups