Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work.

I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
5 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • alexh@fediscience.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    alexh@fediscience.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    alexh@fediscience.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work. For an undergraduate seminar, looking for suggestions for take-downs of popular psychology claims, based on critiquing the underlying flawed research. Below are the suitable ones I have so far.
    "Compared to what?" is one theme I have; it's my phrase for highlighting that one always needs to think about the control/comparison condition and the possibilty of confounds.

    alexh@fediscience.orgA odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO elduvelle@neuromatch.socialE thomasrhysevans@mas.toT 4 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • alexh@fediscience.orgA alexh@fediscience.org

      I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work. For an undergraduate seminar, looking for suggestions for take-downs of popular psychology claims, based on critiquing the underlying flawed research. Below are the suitable ones I have so far.
      "Compared to what?" is one theme I have; it's my phrase for highlighting that one always needs to think about the control/comparison condition and the possibilty of confounds.

      alexh@fediscience.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
      alexh@fediscience.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
      alexh@fediscience.org
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Nietfeld, E. (2025.). What the most famous book about trauma gets wrong. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/media/2024/12/trauma-body-keeps-the-score-van-der-kolk-psychology-therapy-ptsd/ Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Body_Keeps_the_Score

      Learning styles . https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/05/learning-styles-myth

      Damian, R. I., & Roberts, B. W. (2015). Settling the debate on birth order and personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(46), 14119–14120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519064112 What does popular media say about birth order?

      Compared to what?
      Crede, M. (2019). A Negative Effect of a Contractive Pose is not Evidence for the Positive Effect of an Expansive Pose: Comment on Cuddy, Schultz, and Fosse (2018). Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2019.1723

      Ferguson, C. J. (2025). Do social media experiments prove a link with mental health: A methodological and meta-analytic review. Psychology of Popular Media, 14(2), 201. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2024-80192-001

      Bunce, C., Eggleston, A., Brennan, R., & Over, H. (2025). To what extent is research on infrahumanization confounded by intergroup preference? Royal Society Open Science, 12(4). https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/12/4/241348/235666

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alexh@fediscience.orgA alexh@fediscience.org

        I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work. For an undergraduate seminar, looking for suggestions for take-downs of popular psychology claims, based on critiquing the underlying flawed research. Below are the suitable ones I have so far.
        "Compared to what?" is one theme I have; it's my phrase for highlighting that one always needs to think about the control/comparison condition and the possibilty of confounds.

        odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
        odr_k4tana@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
        odr_k4tana@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @alexh weapon effect, power posing, ego depletion, stereotype threat, there's so many of these.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • alexh@fediscience.orgA alexh@fediscience.org

          I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work. For an undergraduate seminar, looking for suggestions for take-downs of popular psychology claims, based on critiquing the underlying flawed research. Below are the suitable ones I have so far.
          "Compared to what?" is one theme I have; it's my phrase for highlighting that one always needs to think about the control/comparison condition and the possibilty of confounds.

          elduvelle@neuromatch.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          elduvelle@neuromatch.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          elduvelle@neuromatch.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @alexh
          We recently published this
          Tolman's Sunburst Maze 80 Years on: A Meta-Analysis Reveals Poor Replicability and Little Evidence for Shortcutting

          It shows that an 80-year-old study, despite being consistently used in lectures and talks to say that rats and humans can do shortcuts over unvisited space, has actually not been replicated and had many flaws. The most solid replication attempts find completely different results from the original experiment while those with somewhat similar results are underpowered or poorly designed.

          Hope this helps, let me know if you have any questions about it!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • alexh@fediscience.orgA alexh@fediscience.org

            I want students to see examples of how shoddy research gets hyped and trace it back to the underlying work. For an undergraduate seminar, looking for suggestions for take-downs of popular psychology claims, based on critiquing the underlying flawed research. Below are the suitable ones I have so far.
            "Compared to what?" is one theme I have; it's my phrase for highlighting that one always needs to think about the control/comparison condition and the possibilty of confounds.

            thomasrhysevans@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
            thomasrhysevans@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
            thomasrhysevans@mas.to
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @alexh A simple but fun example about how breakfast toast-topping could affect mental health. Not shoddy research but how the evidence was distorted (and yes, potentially flawed by some other issues like COI) by the time they became media headlines….

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P9W77YVPGus

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups