Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
103 Posts 43 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

    677: I Accept the Battery Cost
    https://atp.fm/677

    If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

    anirudhc@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
    anirudhc@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
    anirudhc@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #35

    @atpfm Recommend reading this blog by Mitchell Hashimoto (founder of Hashicorp which makes terraform etc.) on how to get better at using AI agents for coding: https://mitchellh.com/writing/my-ai-adoption-journey. He currently makes Ghostty which is a highly performant Mac native (using SwiftUI) terminal which can run these CLI agents very well. cc @marcoarment @siracusa @caseyliss

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

      677: I Accept the Battery Cost
      https://atp.fm/677

      If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

      lordsplodge@brettspiel.spaceL This user is from outside of this forum
      lordsplodge@brettspiel.spaceL This user is from outside of this forum
      lordsplodge@brettspiel.space
      wrote last edited by
      #36

      @atpfm The bad news about so-called AI (and LLMs aren’t really AI) is already known. From the real bad things like pollution of people’s air, and loss of water, through job loses, stolen data, right down to pure greed causing the RAM apocalypse.

      It can write some code or can hallucinate some plausible answers doesn’t counter the damage done.

      usbtypesteve@infosec.exchangeU 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

        677: I Accept the Battery Cost
        https://atp.fm/677

        If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

        aahonen@mastodontti.fiA This user is from outside of this forum
        aahonen@mastodontti.fiA This user is from outside of this forum
        aahonen@mastodontti.fi
        wrote last edited by
        #37

        @atpfm @caseyliss You have to admit that Fahrenheit kind of sucks. Yes, every programmer can understand that water freezes at 2^5 °F but the boiling point? 212 °F 🤯 Come on, that is nowhere near 2^7 or 2^8 😬

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

          @Colman So will you, and everyone else, eventually—for better AND for worse. (See also: electricity, automobiles, modern agriculture, manufactured goods of all kinds, etc.)

          colman@mastodon.ieC This user is from outside of this forum
          colman@mastodon.ieC This user is from outside of this forum
          colman@mastodon.ie
          wrote last edited by
          #38

          @siracusa radioactive nostrums, cocaine* in your soft drinks, nfts …

          (* I’d look up the correct details but I’d have to wade through too much slop.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • vnkr@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            vnkr@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
            vnkr@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #39

            @darxmac @atpfm savage 😂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

              677: I Accept the Battery Cost
              https://atp.fm/677

              If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

              alanjedmonds@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alanjedmonds@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alanjedmonds@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #40

              @atpfm I've lived in England all my life, and I agree with Casey about temperature units. Growing up in the '70s, Fahrenheit was still in common use. My parents had a new heating system fitted in 1977, and the thermostat used Fahrenheit. It has taken me years to get used to Celsius, and I still think in Fahrenheit.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sayrer@mastodon.socialS sayrer@mastodon.social

                @caseyliss @jon I've wondered about this one. It occurred to me that I did not know where Fahrenheit got his scale. It is, in fact, based on human perception of our body temperature (huh! Casey has a point)

                Link Preview Image
                Fahrenheit - Wikipedia

                favicon

                (en.wikipedia.org)

                aahonen@mastodontti.fiA This user is from outside of this forum
                aahonen@mastodontti.fiA This user is from outside of this forum
                aahonen@mastodontti.fi
                wrote last edited by
                #41

                @sayrer @caseyliss @jon Obviously you haven’t been in Finland and in Finnish sauna <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauna>. If the temperature in the sauna is less than 80°C the sauna is considered to be cold. So the typical temperature range is 80°–100°C and hot sauna is over 100°C.
                Lately we have had outside temperatures from -35°C to –10°C in Finland. So, Celsius temperature scale is much better. Q.E.D.

                sayrer@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                  @Colman So will you, and everyone else, eventually—for better AND for worse. (See also: electricity, automobiles, modern agriculture, manufactured goods of all kinds, etc.)

                  vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                  vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                  vmachiel@mastodon.nl
                  wrote last edited by
                  #42

                  @siracusa i do not like the comparison with electricity etc i must say.. those provide huge benefits for everyone. AI uses so much power and stolen material to provide benefits for a relatively small group of the population. Electricity made us all beter and more equal, AI is making it worse.

                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                    677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                    https://atp.fm/677

                    If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                    marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    marcoshuerta@vmst.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #43

                    @atpfm I'm not sure we are thinking through the long term impacts of "agentic" AI writing software.

                    None of these tools make money: Claude Code loses money at $20/month and $100/month. What happens when they start charging what it takes to show a profit margin?

                    I think these tools work when used by otherwise experienced programmers - there's a big risk that it leads to fewer good software engineers and then we have a lot of obtuse machine written code (often written in a language that the writer of claude.md may not know).

                    it's all fine for a low stakes dashboard, it seems fraught for production.

                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • aahonen@mastodontti.fiA aahonen@mastodontti.fi

                      @sayrer @caseyliss @jon Obviously you haven’t been in Finland and in Finnish sauna <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauna>. If the temperature in the sauna is less than 80°C the sauna is considered to be cold. So the typical temperature range is 80°–100°C and hot sauna is over 100°C.
                      Lately we have had outside temperatures from -35°C to –10°C in Finland. So, Celsius temperature scale is much better. Q.E.D.

                      sayrer@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sayrer@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sayrer@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #44

                      @aahonen @caseyliss @jon oh boy, here we go. 🙂 Firstly, I have been there / done that, but it's been a while, and only around Helsinki. Celsius is nice for heating up water like that (Casey said for cooking, but same idea). Celsius is not so good for the outside. In Fahrenheit, 0 is about -18. That's where you better be careful. Above that, just wear a coat and gloves.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                        677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                        https://atp.fm/677

                        If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                        techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        techremarker@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #45

                        @atpfm Google Maps however is much worse than Waze for incident reports, aka for speed traps, items in the road, etc. Over the years the teams merged, and Google Maps in theory got more of that, but when testing both side by side Waze continues to report drastically more in this has always been the biggest benefit of Waze. Apple Maps interface blows both away for an Apple user, but as you noted lacks the data Google has.

                        techremarker@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

                          @atpfm Google Maps however is much worse than Waze for incident reports, aka for speed traps, items in the road, etc. Over the years the teams merged, and Google Maps in theory got more of that, but when testing both side by side Waze continues to report drastically more in this has always been the biggest benefit of Waze. Apple Maps interface blows both away for an Apple user, but as you noted lacks the data Google has.

                          techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          techremarker@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #46

                          @atpfm Waze interface while the tiles are dated, as more Applely notably in CarPlay where most will interact with it. Google interface is still very much Android. So I still find myself jumping between the three. Hopefully eventually all traffic incidents from Waze show up in Google, and the UI gets a bit more refined, then could see myself using that fully even if far less enjoyable than Apple Maps, the other benefits would probably make it worth it.

                          secundus@mastodon.socialS techremarker@mastodon.socialT 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM marcoshuerta@vmst.io

                            @atpfm I'm not sure we are thinking through the long term impacts of "agentic" AI writing software.

                            None of these tools make money: Claude Code loses money at $20/month and $100/month. What happens when they start charging what it takes to show a profit margin?

                            I think these tools work when used by otherwise experienced programmers - there's a big risk that it leads to fewer good software engineers and then we have a lot of obtuse machine written code (often written in a language that the writer of claude.md may not know).

                            it's all fine for a low stakes dashboard, it seems fraught for production.

                            siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            siracusa@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #47

                            @marcoshuerta I agree with all of this! Uber is a similar recent example: "Lose money until we've destroyed enough of the existing market that we can start charging higher prices and customers have nowhere left to turn."

                            The relative timing of the bubble-pop (or even more mild "consolidation") vs. the rate at which these tools improve and we learn how to use them well will probably make a big difference in how this goes.

                            marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

                              @siracusa i do not like the comparison with electricity etc i must say.. those provide huge benefits for everyone. AI uses so much power and stolen material to provide benefits for a relatively small group of the population. Electricity made us all beter and more equal, AI is making it worse.

                              siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              siracusa@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #48

                              @vmachiel I think your opinion of electricity would have been very similar to your opinion of AI had you lived during its dawn! Electricity initially "provided benefits for a relatively small group of the population" while its generation poisoned the air and polluted the water, all of which affected the masses way more than the elites. Oh, and eventually…climate change.

                              vmachiel@mastodon.nlV 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                @vmachiel I think your opinion of electricity would have been very similar to your opinion of AI had you lived during its dawn! Electricity initially "provided benefits for a relatively small group of the population" while its generation poisoned the air and polluted the water, all of which affected the masses way more than the elites. Oh, and eventually…climate change.

                                vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                                vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                                vmachiel@mastodon.nl
                                wrote last edited by
                                #49

                                @siracusa but adding AI on top of our current energy needs is just irresponsible. At this point. Even without AI we are damaging the planet beyond repair. We are burning to planet to generate fake narratives.

                                Plus we didn’t steal everyone’s stuff to make electricity. And electricity doesn’t lie.

                                AI is a curiousity, not a necessity for a decent life like electricity is. You want to use it, but the whole ethical justification is flimsy. And AI is not inevitable

                                siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

                                  @siracusa but adding AI on top of our current energy needs is just irresponsible. At this point. Even without AI we are damaging the planet beyond repair. We are burning to planet to generate fake narratives.

                                  Plus we didn’t steal everyone’s stuff to make electricity. And electricity doesn’t lie.

                                  AI is a curiousity, not a necessity for a decent life like electricity is. You want to use it, but the whole ethical justification is flimsy. And AI is not inevitable

                                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  siracusa@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #50

                                  @vmachiel Electricity was also initially seen as "a curiosity, not a necessity." It was also not seen by everyone as "inevitable." Hindsight is 20/20.

                                  As for "stealing," we have many precedents, both good and bad, in this area, from the printing press to player pianos to VCRs to fonts to APIs. Sometimes we come up with a pretty OK system, and sometimes we end up making things worse. But the basic questions of ownership and compensation in the face of new tech is very old and recurring.

                                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                    @vmachiel Electricity was also initially seen as "a curiosity, not a necessity." It was also not seen by everyone as "inevitable." Hindsight is 20/20.

                                    As for "stealing," we have many precedents, both good and bad, in this area, from the printing press to player pianos to VCRs to fonts to APIs. Sometimes we come up with a pretty OK system, and sometimes we end up making things worse. But the basic questions of ownership and compensation in the face of new tech is very old and recurring.

                                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    siracusa@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #51

                                    @vmachiel And as for the environmental impact of AI's energy usage, despite the fact that it is somewhat overblown as a percentage of total human energy use, it surely will be a short-term problem. And I'd argue that crypto mining (a much more clearcut case of harm with little practical use) shows we are not good at dealing with things like this. But advances in *other* tech (renewable energy) does give me some hope.

                                    vmachiel@mastodon.nlV secundus@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                      @vmachiel And as for the environmental impact of AI's energy usage, despite the fact that it is somewhat overblown as a percentage of total human energy use, it surely will be a short-term problem. And I'd argue that crypto mining (a much more clearcut case of harm with little practical use) shows we are not good at dealing with things like this. But advances in *other* tech (renewable energy) does give me some hope.

                                      vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      vmachiel@mastodon.nl
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #52

                                      @siracusa I just wish we spend those energy gains on useful stuff, not making fake videos to mislead boomers 🙁

                                      siracusa@mastodon.socialS secundus@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

                                        @siracusa I just wish we spend those energy gains on useful stuff, not making fake videos to mislead boomers 🙁

                                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        siracusa@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #53

                                        @vmachiel Oh, and as for things stolen for electricity specifically, we stole a ton stuff for the resources used to generate power: people’s land, resources, freedom, and lives!

                                        vmachiel@mastodon.nlV 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                          @vmachiel Oh, and as for things stolen for electricity specifically, we stole a ton stuff for the resources used to generate power: people’s land, resources, freedom, and lives!

                                          vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          vmachiel@mastodon.nl
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #54

                                          @siracusa all this is true.. and it doesn’t excuse anything about AI imo. Just because it was true for electricity, doesn’t mean we should just plow ahead with AI…

                                          siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups