If politicians gave a shit about children, the schools would feature:
-
@akareilly @PsyChuan That sounds difficult, can’t we just enact mass surveillance instead?
@aral @akareilly @PsyChuan
Sarcasm noted ... at least I hope it is that. -
@macacator @akareilly school shootings are a psychological health issue not a gun issue
@jarinks @macacator @akareilly
Isn't it both? -
@akareilly Similar situation for schools in Germany. Only the book bans are a (IMHO not far away) future.
Given the rhetoric coming out of Merz, I would not be surprised. The CDU/CSU wishlist is indistinguishable from US Republicans on most points.
-
If politicians gave a shit about children, the schools would feature:
- HVAC systems that cleaned viruses out of the air
- at least two child psychologists on staff
- age-appropriate lessons to help children identify abuse
- funding for well-paid staff in numbers sufficient for a buddy system to reduce the chances of abuse
- arts education and after-school clubs to provide third spaces for kids
- massive, safe playgrounds
- protected biking and walking infrastructure from the school to residential neighborhoodsInstead we get “parents’ rights”, funding cuts, book bans, and car-centric infrastructure that kills pedestrians and bikers.
If social media is bad for kids, THEY NEED ALTERNATIVES.
@akareilly Dutch children regularly top polls for the happiest and most well adjusted in the world.
One of the main reasons for this is the country’s cycling infrastructure gives them autonomy from an early age.
-
@akareilly Dutch children regularly top polls for the happiest and most well adjusted in the world.
One of the main reasons for this is the country’s cycling infrastructure gives them autonomy from an early age.
Exactly. It took a lot of fighting by the Stop the Child Murder activists, a movement needed everywhere.
US Americans sacrifice children to the gun lobby. European countries sacrifice children to the car lobby.
-
@akareilly Need to add assault rifle bans to the list.
@j5y7 the 80s assault weapons ban largely criminalised certain accessories. It was a big ridiculous pantomime of safety and security for the politicians and media to get all jazz hands about. It did nothing to address fundamental issues. Passing something similar would end up just as watered down by the gun lobby. The current supreme court is so pro gun, that they're in practice little more than a 2nd amendment enforcement mechanism.
-
@JoeHenzi@vivaldi.net @LukefromDC @oberstenzian
I need more context because this sounds very NotAllMen and I am not the audience for that nonsense.
-
@project1enigma @akareilly @Npars01 They would be if we slaughtered them under rabbinical supervision.
@cjmoorehead @akareilly @Npars01
Not true. Doesn't have cleft hoofs etc.
-
If politicians gave a shit about children, the schools would feature:
- HVAC systems that cleaned viruses out of the air
- at least two child psychologists on staff
- age-appropriate lessons to help children identify abuse
- funding for well-paid staff in numbers sufficient for a buddy system to reduce the chances of abuse
- arts education and after-school clubs to provide third spaces for kids
- massive, safe playgrounds
- protected biking and walking infrastructure from the school to residential neighborhoodsInstead we get “parents’ rights”, funding cuts, book bans, and car-centric infrastructure that kills pedestrians and bikers.
If social media is bad for kids, THEY NEED ALTERNATIVES.
@akareilly i'm not even convinced social media is bad for kids. exploitative corporate social media that constantly signal boosts the worst content, that is designed to be addictive, certainly is bad for kids. but i don't think that means we couldn't have social media spaces for kids that are moderated, largely safe and not built to exploit
but where would be the profit in that?
-
@j5y7 the 80s assault weapons ban largely criminalised certain accessories. It was a big ridiculous pantomime of safety and security for the politicians and media to get all jazz hands about. It did nothing to address fundamental issues. Passing something similar would end up just as watered down by the gun lobby. The current supreme court is so pro gun, that they're in practice little more than a 2nd amendment enforcement mechanism.
@AlexanderMars This is understood, but the original premise of the post is what politicians would do if they actually cared about child safety. Passing meaningful gun legislation falls in that category.
-
@AlexanderMars This is understood, but the original premise of the post is what politicians would do if they actually cared about child safety. Passing meaningful gun legislation falls in that category.
@j5y7 It's not possible in the US, the gun lobby owns too many politicians and federal judges. For all the politicians performative handwringing, pearl clutching and of the children thinking or praying; none of them will do anything.
I've had it with the US; I'm leaving and raising my kids somewhere that I don't have to worry about them getting shot because someone had a bad day at school.
-
@j5y7 It's not possible in the US, the gun lobby owns too many politicians and federal judges. For all the politicians performative handwringing, pearl clutching and of the children thinking or praying; none of them will do anything.
I've had it with the US; I'm leaving and raising my kids somewhere that I don't have to worry about them getting shot because someone had a bad day at school.
@AlexanderMars Possible or not is irrelevant. Thanks.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topicR relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topicR relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
