ai, didn't read.brilliant.
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.I haven't seen much of any AI stuff here. A couple of videos but definitely no text.
Not having a recommendation algorithm for people to game helps a lot
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
-
I haven't seen much of any AI stuff here. A couple of videos but definitely no text.
Not having a recommendation algorithm for people to game helps a lot
But so many linked articles are full of slop, everywhere. That abbreviation is hilarious AND effective (one of my fave combos)
Thanks Ren
-
I haven't seen much of any AI stuff here. A couple of videos but definitely no text.
Not having a recommendation algorithm for people to game helps a lot
@George BNot having a recommendation algorithm for people to game helps a lot
that's just it. here in the real fediverse you either intentionally have to follow an artificial account filled with slop or a human account who repeats slop. such accounts would not last long in my timeline ... -
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis ai: don't care about any #aislop
-
But so many linked articles are full of slop, everywhere. That abbreviation is hilarious AND effective (one of my fave combos)
Thanks Ren Oh yeah it's definitely going to be useful in a few contexts. I'm just glad I eliminated some of the worst ones from my life.
-
But so many linked articles are full of slop, everywhere. That abbreviation is hilarious AND effective (one of my fave combos)
Thanks Ren @PeachMcD @gbargoud @renwillis Articles and whatever meme-adjacent images people boost. It's a little annoying to see people who are against AI boosting those, but eh. I can ignore. I know they're not doing it intentionally, nor does the original poster really get anything from the boosts, except maybe a Number Go Up dopamine rush
-
@PeachMcD @gbargoud @renwillis Articles and whatever meme-adjacent images people boost. It's a little annoying to see people who are against AI boosting those, but eh. I can ignore. I know they're not doing it intentionally, nor does the original poster really get anything from the boosts, except maybe a Number Go Up dopamine rush
@Mimesatwork @PeachMcD @renwillis
If you follow someone who posts good things but is questionable in their judgement when boosting, there is a setting to show only their posts and not their boosts.
(Apologies if you already know about it, I find that it's hidden enough to be worth mentioning when relevant)
Hiding someone’s boosts in Mastodon without blocking or muting them | Fedi.Tips – An Unofficial Guide to Mastodon and the Fediverse
An unofficial guide to using Mastodon and the Fediverse
(fedi.tips)
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis on, I read it as a warning: AI; DON'T Read
-
@Mimesatwork @PeachMcD @renwillis
If you follow someone who posts good things but is questionable in their judgement when boosting, there is a setting to show only their posts and not their boosts.
(Apologies if you already know about it, I find that it's hidden enough to be worth mentioning when relevant)
Hiding someone’s boosts in Mastodon without blocking or muting them | Fedi.Tips – An Unofficial Guide to Mastodon and the Fediverse
An unofficial guide to using Mastodon and the Fediverse
(fedi.tips)
@gbargoud @PeachMcD @renwillis Ah, good to know! I didn't know about the setting, so thank you. I'm fine with them making human errors on occasion. I don't know if they feel the same about my boosts though
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis Trying for testing:
ai;dr
