Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP.

Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
15 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

    Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

    t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
    t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
    t2r@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @jerry What's wild is it's gone up 452% for me since I invested in it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D divergentdave@infosec.exchange

      @jerry I recently invested in an ESG index fund, and I felt a little deflated upon seeing how much of it was in Magnificent 7 stocks

      mhloppy@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
      mhloppy@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
      mhloppy@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @divergentdave A lot of ESG funds with simpler screening (..and therefore cheaper fees) tend to be as-or-more heavy on big tech as a broad market fund since big tech doesn't get caught in screenings for the usual coal / uranium / weapons / etc

      If you want to reduce exposure you probably have to either (1) pay higher fees to a different fund using more stringent screening (..which gives more money to financial companies that are probably not your first preference for "who do I want my money to go to" either) and spend extra effort looking at the screening for all of the funds, or (2) tilt away by market cap with e.g., a small cap fund (or ESG small cap fund if you're willing to pay for two extra-cost fund features).

      I guess you could also (3) go with a fund that intentionally targets low/no US exposure? (e.g., a European or ex-US fund), but the ratio of baby:bathwater thrown out is a bit rough.

      @jerry

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

        Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
        simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @jerry

        That funds a lot of crocodile skin jackets, crocodile tears and corporate techno fascism.

        🤨🤦‍♂️

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

          Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

          masek@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          masek@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          masek@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @jerry I was there, Gandalf. I was there three thousand 26 years ago. I was there the day the strength of dotcon failed.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

            Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

            infosecstuc@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            infosecstuc@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            infosecstuc@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @jerry what could possibly go wrong?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

              Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

              fedops@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
              fedops@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
              fedops@fosstodon.org
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @jerry built almost entirely on circular investments. No way for that all to come crumbling down and take 30% of the GDP with it.

              gary_alderson@infosec.exchangeG silvermoon82@wandering.shopS 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

                jernej__s@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jernej__s@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jernej__s@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @jerry 🫧

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                  Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

                  daveflater@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  daveflater@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  daveflater@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @jerry their market value OTOH is shrinking as China seeks technological independence from arbitrary US trade barriers

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fedops@fosstodon.orgF fedops@fosstodon.org

                    @jerry built almost entirely on circular investments. No way for that all to come crumbling down and take 30% of the GDP with it.

                    gary_alderson@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gary_alderson@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gary_alderson@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @fedops @jerry my view is that some of it will crash and burn but over a longer period it will do fine and a lot of companies are going to do well but what do you trade now for hedging your bets - probably diversified portfolio, bonds, cash and buy after next correction, it could be a while. the real question is are you going to bet on tech when it is running the entire mkt so disproportionately

                    Link Preview Image
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • fedops@fosstodon.orgF fedops@fosstodon.org

                      @jerry built almost entirely on circular investments. No way for that all to come crumbling down and take 30% of the GDP with it.

                      silvermoon82@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                      silvermoon82@wandering.shopS This user is from outside of this forum
                      silvermoon82@wandering.shop
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @fedops @jerry
                      Right? Almost all of their revenue is totally imaginary.

                      There is no way this situation could have a negative outcome.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                        Nvidia’s market cap is equal to over 17% of the US GDP. That is wild.

                        aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                        aakl@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @jerry That's risky.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups