Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Lol. Rofl, even.

Lol. Rofl, even.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
41 Posts 35 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • q@glauca.spaceQ q@glauca.space

    @sophieschmieg what the hell even is quantum AI? we made it even less deterministic??

    ozzelot@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    ozzelot@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    ozzelot@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @q
    And how exactly does one "use" quantum computing
    @sophieschmieg

    dalias@hachyderm.ioD pmjv@snac.lab8.czP 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • q@glauca.spaceQ q@glauca.space

      @sophieschmieg what the hell even is quantum AI? we made it even less deterministic??

      darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      darkling@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      darkling@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @q @sophieschmieg It's like AI, but with added QUANTUMS! That'll make it EVEN BETTER! The investors will LOVE IT!

      I believe this encompasses the sum total of thought on the subject.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

        @q I have no idea. I work in this field, and I have no idea.

        slothrop@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        slothrop@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        slothrop@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @sophieschmieg @q Implementing a full quantum AI stack without a blockchain feels like a missed opportunity tbh

        paradegrotesque@mastodon.sdf.orgP eldersea@expressional.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

          Lol. Rofl, even.

          (Not the Onion: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030)

          Link Preview Image
          darkasvim@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
          darkasvim@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
          darkasvim@fosstodon.org
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @sophieschmieg But..but...industry buzzwords!!!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

            Lol. Rofl, even.

            (Not the Onion: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030)

            Link Preview Image
            elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
            elight@tenforward.social
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @sophieschmieg @danlyke Me after reading that quotation a couple of times.

            danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • slothrop@chaos.socialS slothrop@chaos.social

              @sophieschmieg @q Implementing a full quantum AI stack without a blockchain feels like a missed opportunity tbh

              paradegrotesque@mastodon.sdf.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
              paradegrotesque@mastodon.sdf.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
              paradegrotesque@mastodon.sdf.org
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @slothrop

              Stop giving them ideas, please.

              Just... Stop. 😉
              @sophieschmieg @q

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elight@tenforward.socialE elight@tenforward.social

                @sophieschmieg @danlyke Me after reading that quotation a couple of times.

                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD This user is from outside of this forum
                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD This user is from outside of this forum
                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.host
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @elight somehow we, as a society, have decided that these chucklefucks should be in charge of the allocation of capital.

                elight@tenforward.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • q@glauca.spaceQ q@glauca.space

                  @sophieschmieg what the hell even is quantum AI? we made it even less deterministic??

                  elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  elight@tenforward.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @q @sophieschmieg Well, you know, there's stochastic and then there's JFC STOCHASTIC. That one goes to eleven.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • q@glauca.spaceQ q@glauca.space

                    @sophieschmieg what the hell even is quantum AI? we made it even less deterministic??

                    stephanie@thetransagenda.gayS This user is from outside of this forum
                    stephanie@thetransagenda.gayS This user is from outside of this forum
                    stephanie@thetransagenda.gay
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @q@glauca.space @sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange "Quantum AI" is a term that means "hey, look, we have both buzzwords! Give us more money!"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.host

                      @elight somehow we, as a society, have decided that these chucklefucks should be in charge of the allocation of capital.

                      elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      elight@tenforward.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @danlyke It is awfully ironic that you should use this word. I found myself nearly perseverating on it yesterday. Somehow, for a few minutes, it became the most fascinating word in the English language.

                      I think Vonnegut would mark this one up as you and I are in the same karass. And then he'd call us idiots for buying into his bullshit.

                      danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

                        Lol. Rofl, even.

                        (Not the Onion: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030)

                        Link Preview Image
                        jawnsy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jawnsy@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jawnsy@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @sophieschmieg That's why there's Quantum NVLink 😊

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tess@mastodon.socialT tess@mastodon.social

                          @sophieschmieg PIVOT TO QUANTUM!

                          eldersea@expressional.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eldersea@expressional.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eldersea@expressional.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @tess RETVRN TO QVANTVM!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • slothrop@chaos.socialS slothrop@chaos.social

                            @sophieschmieg @q Implementing a full quantum AI stack without a blockchain feels like a missed opportunity tbh

                            eldersea@expressional.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eldersea@expressional.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eldersea@expressional.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @slothrop @sophieschmieg @q You can tell it's good because it's already blockchAIn! It says so! Right there^^^!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

                              Lol. Rofl, even.

                              (Not the Onion: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030)

                              Link Preview Image
                              catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                              catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                              catsalad@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @sophieschmieg Perfect for the $1 trillion market value the Metaverse will bring in by then!

                              Oh wait...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • elight@tenforward.socialE elight@tenforward.social

                                @danlyke It is awfully ironic that you should use this word. I found myself nearly perseverating on it yesterday. Somehow, for a few minutes, it became the most fascinating word in the English language.

                                I think Vonnegut would mark this one up as you and I are in the same karass. And then he'd call us idiots for buying into his bullshit.

                                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD This user is from outside of this forum
                                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD This user is from outside of this forum
                                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.host
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @elight I have been trying to find words that express my disdain for the level of "thinking" that's going into the embrace of AI.

                                I have been taken to task for suggesting that grown-ass adults stuck in Piaget's Animism stage might have developmental disabilities, but I don't know how else to view this level of delusion.

                                danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

                                  Lol. Rofl, even.

                                  (Not the Onion: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030)

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davemwilburn@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @sophieschmieg

                                  Hopefully GenAI replaces 59% of executives by 2030. It's maybe the one job the robots could do better.

                                  joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ timbray@cosocial.caT 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange

                                    Lol. Rofl, even.

                                    (Not the Onion: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030)

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    krnlg@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @sophieschmieg "Thought Leadership" indeed.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.host

                                      @elight I have been trying to find words that express my disdain for the level of "thinking" that's going into the embrace of AI.

                                      I have been taken to task for suggesting that grown-ass adults stuck in Piaget's Animism stage might have developmental disabilities, but I don't know how else to view this level of delusion.

                                      danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.hostD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      danlyke@researchbuzz.masto.host
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @elight also, it's making me realize just how disconnected the ability to play the social game is from the ability to actually build shit.

                                      And I'm stuck building shit. Or, more to the point, fixing shit that wasn't built well in the first place.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD davemwilburn@infosec.exchange

                                        @sophieschmieg

                                        Hopefully GenAI replaces 59% of executives by 2030. It's maybe the one job the robots could do better.

                                        joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        joshg@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        joshg@mathstodon.xyz
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @DaveMWilburn @sophieschmieg here's a prototype, er I mean an ADVANCED VC-BACKED INITIATIVE
                                        https://replaceyourboss.ai/

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davemwilburn@infosec.exchangeD davemwilburn@infosec.exchange

                                          @sophieschmieg

                                          Hopefully GenAI replaces 59% of executives by 2030. It's maybe the one job the robots could do better.

                                          timbray@cosocial.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          timbray@cosocial.caT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          timbray@cosocial.ca
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @DaveMWilburn @sophieschmieg Won't really be a thing until it's on the blockchain.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups