Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
othernetworks
40 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

    finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

    Link Preview Image
    nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
    nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
    nicksilkey@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @loriemerson amazing - I tracked down the source. Thanks for this! 🙇‍♀️✌️💙

    Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer
    Wendell Berry
    New England Review and Bread Loaf Quarterly
    Vol. 10, No. 1 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 112-113 (2 pages)
    Published By: Middlebury College Publications

    Link Preview Image
    JSTOR: Access Check

    JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

    favicon

    (www.jstor.org)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

      finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

      Link Preview Image
      scottytrees@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      scottytrees@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      scottytrees@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @loriemerson yeah that’s a fantasy list that doesn’t exist anymore lol

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

        Link Preview Image
        perhaps391@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        perhaps391@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        perhaps391@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @loriemerson wow, current vibe-coded software tools fail almost every one of these standards.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

          finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

          Link Preview Image
          nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
          nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
          nickrauchen@c.im
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @loriemerson

          I like to go to original sources, so here's a link via @Kottke.org...

          https://classes.matthewjbrown.net/teaching-files/philtech/berry-computer.pdf

          Link Preview Image
          Nine Rules for Evaluating New Technology

          In 1987, Wendell Berry wrote an essay called Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer. In it, he outlined his standards for adopting new technology in his work

          favicon

          kottke.org (kottke.org)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.orgA aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.org

            @loriemerson 10. Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text.

            nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
            nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
            nickrauchen@c.im
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @aakoskin @loriemerson

            "Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text."

            For a simple list like the above. I agree.

            I suspect that there is a "plain text penalty" for words/ideas without imagery in social media, but I'm not up on the trends, rules, or research in that domain.

            lxskllr@mastodon.worldL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nickrauchen@c.imN nickrauchen@c.im

              @aakoskin @loriemerson

              "Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text."

              For a simple list like the above. I agree.

              I suspect that there is a "plain text penalty" for words/ideas without imagery in social media, but I'm not up on the trends, rules, or research in that domain.

              lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
              lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
              lxskllr@mastodon.world
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

              Might run out of characters. Default mastodon limit is 500. I've done text images to get around the limit.

              loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL nickrauchen@c.imN 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                Might run out of characters. Default mastodon limit is 500. I've done text images to get around the limit.

                loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                loriemerson@post.lurk.org
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @lxskllr @nickrauchen @aakoskin I am having trouble wrapping my head why the format of my post is worth anyone commenting on - the text is in the image. it's not elegant but I wanted to give a screenshot of the exact text I was reading from Harper's. surely there are more important things to discuss here, and in general, than policing precisely how people post

                nickrauchen@c.imN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                  @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                  Might run out of characters. Default mastodon limit is 500. I've done text images to get around the limit.

                  nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nickrauchen@c.im
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                  I think the char limit varies on #Mastodon depending on server, client, etc.

                  Something textual that is "long form" can be threaded, yes?

                  lxskllr@mastodon.worldL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nickrauchen@c.imN nickrauchen@c.im

                    @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                    I think the char limit varies on #Mastodon depending on server, client, etc.

                    Something textual that is "long form" can be threaded, yes?

                    lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lxskllr@mastodon.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                    It can, but threaded posts are kind of annoying imo. Sometimes it's better to have everything in one view.

                    I say that someone who does a minimum of one threaded post every day :^D

                    nickrauchen@c.imN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                      @lxskllr @nickrauchen @aakoskin I am having trouble wrapping my head why the format of my post is worth anyone commenting on - the text is in the image. it's not elegant but I wanted to give a screenshot of the exact text I was reading from Harper's. surely there are more important things to discuss here, and in general, than policing precisely how people post

                      nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nickrauchen@c.im
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @loriemerson @lxskllr @aakoskin

                      Speaking as a reader of your post, I'd rather have the text than a picture of the text. In this case I think all/most of the content was in the alt text, which is good but may be hidden for some (depends on the UI).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                        @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                        It can, but threaded posts are kind of annoying imo. Sometimes it's better to have everything in one view.

                        I say that someone who does a minimum of one threaded post every day :^D

                        nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nickrauchen@c.im
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                        Threading in #Mastodon is pretty clunky I agree. I can't remember much about it, but in old-school #twitter there was an obvious "Continue" or "Next" button for threading. The server I'm currently on has a much larger char limit so it has not been an issue. The main reason I thread anything is for topics like travel logs that unfold over time.

                        Then there's just being kind to your readers... keep things simple, short, and concise. An ideal I am sometimes not able to achieve even with good intentions. 🙂

                        lxskllr@mastodon.worldL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                          finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                          Link Preview Image
                          falcennial@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          falcennial@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          falcennial@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #38

                          @loriemerson the Wendellian laws should be international law

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nickrauchen@c.imN nickrauchen@c.im

                            @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                            Threading in #Mastodon is pretty clunky I agree. I can't remember much about it, but in old-school #twitter there was an obvious "Continue" or "Next" button for threading. The server I'm currently on has a much larger char limit so it has not been an issue. The main reason I thread anything is for topics like travel logs that unfold over time.

                            Then there's just being kind to your readers... keep things simple, short, and concise. An ideal I am sometimes not able to achieve even with good intentions. 🙂

                            lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lxskllr@mastodon.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39

                            @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                            "Then there's just being kind to your readers... keep things simple, short, and concise"

                            That's what I like about my low character limit. It enforces brevity. It's also what I don't like about it. Double edged sword. Trying to work with limited resources is a good exercise, even if they can't always be adhered to 100%.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                              finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                              Link Preview Image
                              frchazzz@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              frchazzz@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              frchazzz@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              @loriemerson Reading this makes me regret leaving behind my vintage copy of "The Unsettling of America" when I had to move. Berry is wonderful.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups