Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. SCPs are modern folklore.

SCPs are modern folklore.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
scp
35 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    So why does this SCP "work" ?

    I don't think you need to dig very deep to understand it. A politician gives a "pivotal" speech later we come to see the dishonesty of that speech.

    Like a haunted house the tape begins to expose the true nature and violence behind the ideas in the speech.

    But would someone who loved Ronald Reagan see it the same way?

    5/5

    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.win
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    I just want to add that looking back on 1981... it's been bad before. Bad like it is now. And that kind of gives me hope.

    futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      Among Evangelicals the need to do "foreign wars" was increasingly questioned. In an era of greater media centralization a single great speech by a president could still be blown up into a moment (and 'the gipper*' was pretty good at speeches) so the narrative was that this wonderful message sealed the deal and lay all those worries to rest.

      America was good and helping everyone by "stopping communism" and Jesus agrees.

      3/

      * tf is a 'gipper'?

      moss@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
      moss@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
      moss@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @futurebird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gipp

      futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • moss@beige.partyM moss@beige.party

        @futurebird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gipp

        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.win
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @Moss

        Thank you and I'm still confused.

        Did they think he was like a football star?

        moss@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          @Moss

          Thank you and I'm still confused.

          Did they think he was like a football star?

          moss@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          moss@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          moss@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @futurebird Reagan played Gipp in a movie about his coach. He later used the “win one for the Gipper” line in speeches for both himself and Bush.

          futurebird@sauropods.winF emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.spaceE 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • moss@beige.partyM moss@beige.party

            @futurebird Reagan played Gipp in a movie about his coach. He later used the “win one for the Gipper” line in speeches for both himself and Bush.

            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
            futurebird@sauropods.win
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @Moss

            Thanks.

            That makes sense, I don't know why knowing it makes me so tired.

            moss@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              @Moss

              Thanks.

              That makes sense, I don't know why knowing it makes me so tired.

              moss@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
              moss@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
              moss@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @futurebird it’s so hollow and over-stretched, just like all the other shit we “have to” understand about these people.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                Among Evangelicals the need to do "foreign wars" was increasingly questioned. In an era of greater media centralization a single great speech by a president could still be blown up into a moment (and 'the gipper*' was pretty good at speeches) so the narrative was that this wonderful message sealed the deal and lay all those worries to rest.

                America was good and helping everyone by "stopping communism" and Jesus agrees.

                3/

                * tf is a 'gipper'?

                count_01@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                count_01@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                count_01@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @futurebird Oh, I know this one! He got the nickname "the Gipper" from a movie he starred in that was about the football coach Knute Rockne, whose star quarterback George Gipp (hence the nickname) was in a car wreck. (small plane maybe? neither were particularly safe in the late 1930s)

                Rockne urged the team to get out and win one for the Gipper, and they did, and Reagan played the part of the Gipper in a movie about it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • moss@beige.partyM moss@beige.party

                  @futurebird Reagan played Gipp in a movie about his coach. He later used the “win one for the Gipper” line in speeches for both himself and Bush.

                  emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.spaceE This user is from outside of this forum
                  emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.spaceE This user is from outside of this forum
                  emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.space
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @Moss @futurebird WTF this is *as bad* as reagan telling stories about being a wwii fighter pilot

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                    So why does this SCP "work" ?

                    I don't think you need to dig very deep to understand it. A politician gives a "pivotal" speech later we come to see the dishonesty of that speech.

                    Like a haunted house the tape begins to expose the true nature and violence behind the ideas in the speech.

                    But would someone who loved Ronald Reagan see it the same way?

                    5/5

                    delta_vee@cosocial.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                    delta_vee@cosocial.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                    delta_vee@cosocial.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @futurebird Sidenote: the earliest version of that SCP had a mention of "unfolders" (changed to "unravellers" to avoid plagiarism accusations), which referenced Zach Parsons' "That Insidious Beast" (https://www.somethingawful.com/series/that-insidious-beast/), a story of an alternate US driven by religious fervor but with actually-existing supernatural(-seeming) entities driving cataclysmic violence.

                    inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                      So why does this SCP "work" ?

                      I don't think you need to dig very deep to understand it. A politician gives a "pivotal" speech later we come to see the dishonesty of that speech.

                      Like a haunted house the tape begins to expose the true nature and violence behind the ideas in the speech.

                      But would someone who loved Ronald Reagan see it the same way?

                      5/5

                      ephesossh@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                      ephesossh@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                      ephesossh@mastodon.online
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @futurebird it's like a Dorian Gray via Blockbuster, I love it

                      I mean, totally cursed, but very fitting for that moment

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.spaceE This user is from outside of this forum
                        emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.spaceE This user is from outside of this forum
                        emily_rugburn@lgbtqia.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @Aletheia_E @Moss @futurebird i hadnt heard that one but i would not be surprised in the slightest. the reagan documentary series on showtime was very....informative.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          So why does this SCP "work" ?

                          I don't think you need to dig very deep to understand it. A politician gives a "pivotal" speech later we come to see the dishonesty of that speech.

                          Like a haunted house the tape begins to expose the true nature and violence behind the ideas in the speech.

                          But would someone who loved Ronald Reagan see it the same way?

                          5/5

                          futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                          futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                          futurebird@sauropods.win
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          I've just realized that the "Evil Empire" speech was on March 8, 1983 and I let the name of the SCP confused me about the year. But it doesn't change much about these observations.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                            I just want to add that looking back on 1981... it's been bad before. Bad like it is now. And that kind of gives me hope.

                            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                            futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                            futurebird@sauropods.win
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            When I read accounts of this speech there is a lot of focus on the phrase "evil empire" and how more secular media found it inflammatory. There was a "presidents don't speak like this" freak out. I think this misses the things that made the speech necessary from the perspective of the interventionist right wing political stance.

                            They were LOSING the evangelicals over this nonsense. They needed to frame it as a moral battle against "communism."

                            And it worked.

                            futurebird@sauropods.winF bogosity@im-in.spaceB 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                              When I read accounts of this speech there is a lot of focus on the phrase "evil empire" and how more secular media found it inflammatory. There was a "presidents don't speak like this" freak out. I think this misses the things that made the speech necessary from the perspective of the interventionist right wing political stance.

                              They were LOSING the evangelicals over this nonsense. They needed to frame it as a moral battle against "communism."

                              And it worked.

                              futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                              futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                              futurebird@sauropods.win
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              Reading about it has helped me to understand some of the nonsense we are seeing now. But today talking about an "evil empire" is even more of a non-starter than it was in 1983... Americans regard communism as over. This has left the interventionists flailing and struggling to explain what they are doing.

                              Though this stuff still works on some older people.

                              inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI J cshlan@dawdling.netC 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                Among Evangelicals the need to do "foreign wars" was increasingly questioned. In an era of greater media centralization a single great speech by a president could still be blown up into a moment (and 'the gipper*' was pretty good at speeches) so the narrative was that this wonderful message sealed the deal and lay all those worries to rest.

                                America was good and helping everyone by "stopping communism" and Jesus agrees.

                                3/

                                * tf is a 'gipper'?

                                mpark@mathstodon.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mpark@mathstodon.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mpark@mathstodon.xyz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @futurebird re: gipper

                                George Gipp was a college football player who's name was used to motivate his team after his death. Reagan played the coach that gave a speech that included the line, "Win one for the Gipper." At some point after that, people started referring to Reagan as the Gipper because of his association with that speech.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                  Reading about it has helped me to understand some of the nonsense we are seeing now. But today talking about an "evil empire" is even more of a non-starter than it was in 1983... Americans regard communism as over. This has left the interventionists flailing and struggling to explain what they are doing.

                                  Though this stuff still works on some older people.

                                  inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  inkyschwartz@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @futurebird And Communism got a rebrand as "Anything a lefty says".

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • delta_vee@cosocial.caD delta_vee@cosocial.ca

                                    @futurebird Sidenote: the earliest version of that SCP had a mention of "unfolders" (changed to "unravellers" to avoid plagiarism accusations), which referenced Zach Parsons' "That Insidious Beast" (https://www.somethingawful.com/series/that-insidious-beast/), a story of an alternate US driven by religious fervor but with actually-existing supernatural(-seeming) entities driving cataclysmic violence.

                                    inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    inkyschwartz@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @delta_vee @futurebird Those were rather creepy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                      Reading about it has helped me to understand some of the nonsense we are seeing now. But today talking about an "evil empire" is even more of a non-starter than it was in 1983... Americans regard communism as over. This has left the interventionists flailing and struggling to explain what they are doing.

                                      Though this stuff still works on some older people.

                                      J This user is from outside of this forum
                                      J This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jameswidman@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @futurebird i dunno; if i hear someone use the phrase "evil empire" now, as a knee-jerk reaction i'll assume they're referring to the united states (though on 2nd thought, they could also be referring to the netanyahu regime, or the putin regime; but maybe less so, bc they don't really have much of an empire (yet)).

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                        SCPs are modern folklore. The universe and associated media are very popular. I don't think the SCP fanbase is especially interested in politics or literally analysis. SCPs gain fame (infamy?) by being creepy, by having the right mix of plausible and horrific.

                                        This is why I find SCP-1981 especially interesting. It's a haunted VHS tape of Ronald Reagan delivering his "Evil Empire" speech to the National Association of Evangelicals.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        SCP-1981 - SCP Foundation

                                        The SCP Foundation's 'top-secret' archives, declassified for your enjoyment.

                                        favicon

                                        The SCP Foundation (scp-wiki.wikidot.com)

                                        #scp

                                        1/

                                        misterdave@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        misterdave@tilde.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        misterdave@tilde.zone
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @futurebird most cassette based scp ought to be partially taped-over with non-anomalous content, for realism and flavor.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          Reading about it has helped me to understand some of the nonsense we are seeing now. But today talking about an "evil empire" is even more of a non-starter than it was in 1983... Americans regard communism as over. This has left the interventionists flailing and struggling to explain what they are doing.

                                          Though this stuff still works on some older people.

                                          cshlan@dawdling.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cshlan@dawdling.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cshlan@dawdling.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @futurebird
                                          They've moved on to Bush's Axis of Evil. Combining memories of the Cold War with WWII.

                                          futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups