Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It turns out GenAI code changes are causing serious incidents and outages at Amazon with "high blast radius" https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de

It turns out GenAI code changes are causing serious incidents and outages at Amazon with "high blast radius" https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
24 Posts 21 Posters 30 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    Here's a different article about the same topic https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/amazon-calls-engineers-to-address-issues-caused-by-use-of-ai-tools-report-claims-company-says-recent-incidents-had-high-blast-radius-and-were-allegedly-related-to-gen-ai-assisted-changes

    aaron@social.caskey-demaret.seA This user is from outside of this forum
    aaron@social.caskey-demaret.seA This user is from outside of this forum
    aaron@social.caskey-demaret.se
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @cwebber re. Tom's Hardware article: Why must every story about how genAI sucks end with "While GenAI is definitely useful in some circumstances..." or something similar? Stories about how a Coal plant poisoned a river don't end in "While it's true that coal plants generate useful electricity..." as though that is something that needs reinforcing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      It turns out GenAI code changes are causing serious incidents and outages at Amazon with "high blast radius" https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de

      Junior / middle engineers no longer allowed to push GenAI code to production without senior engineer review

      (HT @KimPerales )

      jennyfluff@chitter.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jennyfluff@chitter.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jennyfluff@chitter.xyz
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      @cwebber @KimPerales AmazonSlopService

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • deech@mastodon.socialD deech@mastodon.social

        @cwebber @KimPerales I'll bet $100 the incidents would have happened even with sign off. No one wants to review slop.

        abhayakara@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
        abhayakara@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
        abhayakara@mastodon.nl
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @deech @cwebber @KimPerales

        Ah, but then there would have been a senior engineer to blame, and it would no longer be the LLM looking bad...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          It turns out GenAI code changes are causing serious incidents and outages at Amazon with "high blast radius" https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de

          Junior / middle engineers no longer allowed to push GenAI code to production without senior engineer review

          (HT @KimPerales )

          ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
          ox1de@cyberplace.social
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @cwebber @KimPerales interesting senior devs weren't reviewing them

          cwebber@social.coopC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ox1de@cyberplace.socialO ox1de@cyberplace.social

            @cwebber @KimPerales interesting senior devs weren't reviewing them

            cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
            cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
            cwebber@social.coop
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @Ox1de @KimPerales A bunch of people are saying this, but it's common for mid-level engineers to do code reviews also normally

            ox1de@cyberplace.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • deech@mastodon.socialD deech@mastodon.social

              @cwebber @KimPerales I'll bet $100 the incidents would have happened even with sign off. No one wants to review slop.

              agentultra@types.plA This user is from outside of this forum
              agentultra@types.plA This user is from outside of this forum
              agentultra@types.pl
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @KimPerales@toad.social @deech @cwebber not a matter of “if” it would happen in my mind, but when.

              Human review is a limited control gap in the system of pushing changes to a production system and has limited utility in preventing errors.

              Most empirical studies I’ve read seem to agree that human code review has a marginal effect on error rates that disappears of the reviewer had read a couple hundred SLOC in the last hour.

              CEOs aren’t engineers and most software developers aren’t either, IMO. Liability is very screwy in our industry.

              Making developers sign off on changes they can’t even hope to vet is a disaster waiting to happen.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                @Ox1de @KimPerales A bunch of people are saying this, but it's common for mid-level engineers to do code reviews also normally

                ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ox1de@cyberplace.social
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @cwebber @KimPerales yeah, not were I worked, we developed applications for electrical, safe-shutdown and fire protection engineers for the nuclear industry and were regular audited by the NRC.

                I get it's a different situation, or is it? Doesn't amazon have government contracts that deal with safety and civilian lives?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • twipped@twipped.socialT twipped@twipped.social

                  @cwebber is there a link thats readable without paying for a subscription?

                  mnf@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mnf@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mnf@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @twipped @cwebber https://archive.is/wXvF3

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    It turns out GenAI code changes are causing serious incidents and outages at Amazon with "high blast radius" https://www.ft.com/content/7cab4ec7-4712-4137-b602-119a44f771de

                    Junior / middle engineers no longer allowed to push GenAI code to production without senior engineer review

                    (HT @KimPerales )

                    alice@lgbtqia.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                    alice@lgbtqia.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                    alice@lgbtqia.space
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @cwebber Amazon, WTF, Seriously?? (AWS)

                    @KimPerales

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zwol@masto.hackers.town
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @arichtman @deech @cwebber @KimPerales Yeah I can't remember the official psychology term either but it's real. Same phenomenon as it being hard to notice typos. And, in fact, same phenomenon as drivers not seeing bikers and walkers, which may be a better way to highlight the safety concerns here.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      • twipped@twipped.socialT twipped@twipped.social

                        @cwebber is there a link thats readable without paying for a subscription?

                        stephanie@thetransagenda.gayS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stephanie@thetransagenda.gayS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stephanie@thetransagenda.gay
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @twipped@twipped.social @cwebber@social.coop Does this work? https://archive.is/hLd8X

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups