Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see.

So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
44 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ zkat@fedi.zkat.tech

    @cwebber that I'm now paranoid that by "doing research on competing implementations" he means "copycatting Kat's work" and now I'm glad that I've stopped working on orogene in public.

    janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
    janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
    janl@narrativ.es
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @zkat @cwebber jesus

    zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • janl@narrativ.esJ janl@narrativ.es

      @zkat @cwebber jesus

      zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zkat@fedi.zkat.tech
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @janl @cwebber I mean not just mine, but pnpm and Yarn’s. The latter is also porting to Rust

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • janl@narrativ.esJ janl@narrativ.es

        @zkat @cwebber jesus

        cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
        cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
        cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @janl @zkat @cwebber seconding the "jesus"

        zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

          - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
          - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
          - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
          - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

          What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

          > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

          Link Preview Image
          Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

          I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

          favicon

          Nitter (xcancel.com)

          What can we make of this?

          jrconlin@mindof.jrconlin.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jrconlin@mindof.jrconlin.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jrconlin@mindof.jrconlin.com
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @cwebber

          The thing I laugh about in all of this, the thing that is absolutely the funniest, is that while these AI generated or "rewritten" projects may be Open Source, it will never be free.

          It was created using a sizable investment.
          It can only be maintained by additional investment.
          No one, external, will want or be able to contribute, meaning no prospect of continuance.

          There will absolutely be licensing fees, because money has to come from somewhere, which absolutely undercuts whatever value they might think they're offering. That kind of renders these projects as instant abandon-ware, and any systems architect worth their salt is absolutely going to spot that red flag.

          Truly, the learning opportunities are endless.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev

            @janl @zkat @cwebber seconding the "jesus"

            zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zkat@fedi.zkat.tech
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @cthos @janl @cwebber to be clear: I easily share my code with folks. I don't mind the "spirit" of foss. I take issue with having my work thrown into a soulless machine devoid of any of the community I would otherwise be building. I think it's healthy for us to look at each others' implementations and compare notes and have done a lot of that, and a lot of sharing of my own.

            but honestly, fuck Jarred in particular. He's always been kind of a dickbag.

            cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • zkat@fedi.zkat.techZ zkat@fedi.zkat.tech

              @cthos @janl @cwebber to be clear: I easily share my code with folks. I don't mind the "spirit" of foss. I take issue with having my work thrown into a soulless machine devoid of any of the community I would otherwise be building. I think it's healthy for us to look at each others' implementations and compare notes and have done a lot of that, and a lot of sharing of my own.

              but honestly, fuck Jarred in particular. He's always been kind of a dickbag.

              cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
              cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC This user is from outside of this forum
              cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @zkat @janl @cwebber yeah none of that was a reflection on you, just "holy shit what a shitshow" from bun / that guy.

              janl@narrativ.esJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cthos@mastodon.cthos.devC cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev

                @zkat @janl @cwebber yeah none of that was a reflection on you, just "holy shit what a shitshow" from bun / that guy.

                janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
                janl@narrativ.esJ This user is from outside of this forum
                janl@narrativ.es
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @cthos @zkat @cwebber this

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  Note that this rewrite has a lot of resources at its disposal. The porting.md file has a ton of direction, more than historically an LLM can keep track of: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/46d3bc29f270fa881dd5730ef1549e88407701a5/docs/PORTING.md

                  But Anthropic acquired Bun, so I imagine this project has effectively as many tokens to use as it wants.

                  If this rewrite succeeds, this will effectively not only be a "fuck you Zig for not accepting my AIgen patches", it'll be a big headline and marketing story for Anthropic: look! Claude could rewrite Bun from Zig to Rust!

                  It's hard for me to read this then as anything but an experiment to see if Anthropic can get a big marketing boost in favor of vibecoding from.

                  slyecho@mdon.eeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  slyecho@mdon.eeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  slyecho@mdon.ee
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @cwebber hard for an LLM, but in 2026 these kinds of things are not done just by an LLM. Multiple parallel and subagents using different models, that can reference multiple files and go back and check on these instructions and correct mistakes, investigating changes from git history, running tests, creating new tests, and so on.

                  Of course, it is all running on LLMs in the end, and using thousands of dollars of tokens. Which he can get for free from his employer, of course.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • federicomena@mstdn.mxF federicomena@mstdn.mx

                    @cwebber I don't understand being the lead of a project, ostensibly understanding most of the code and its history, and slopping it up into an AI translation that you don't know at all. Yes, please turn my carefully handcrafted artifact into a pile of legacy code, at scale.

                    ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ggherdov@fosstodon.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @federicomena @cwebber There's also Andreas Kling/Ladybird making similar announcement ~3 months ago. https://ladybird.org/posts/adopting-rust/
                    You and I have diff views on the matter (I like genAI for code, within reason). I read Kling's move as: I have goals w/ ladybird, ie (1) making a new high quality browser and (2) having as much fun/enjoyment in the process as it's fair. C++ is kinda getting in the way of (1), but manual rewrite is polar opposite of (2), so let's see if genAI can help eat cake + have cake.

                    ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG ggherdov@fosstodon.org

                      @federicomena @cwebber There's also Andreas Kling/Ladybird making similar announcement ~3 months ago. https://ladybird.org/posts/adopting-rust/
                      You and I have diff views on the matter (I like genAI for code, within reason). I read Kling's move as: I have goals w/ ladybird, ie (1) making a new high quality browser and (2) having as much fun/enjoyment in the process as it's fair. C++ is kinda getting in the way of (1), but manual rewrite is polar opposite of (2), so let's see if genAI can help eat cake + have cake.

                      ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ggherdov@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ggherdov@fosstodon.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @federicomena @cwebber But Federico's point "I don't understand being the lead ..." applies 5x to Ladybird. For Bun, Christine points out these folks know 100% what they're doing (epic marketing stunt + savage diss at Zig with its no-AI policy). Kling and Ladybird is the "Got no horse in the race, and yet I think AI-assist is the way to go."

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 0x0@hachyderm.io0 This user is from outside of this forum
                        0x0@hachyderm.io0 This user is from outside of this forum
                        0x0@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @tychi

                        Key signing parties but for codebases...

                        @be @cwebber

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                          But this won't be an ordinary vibecoding story if it succeeds, but it might *look that way* from a marketing perspective. It has the lead maintainer giving a *ton* of guidance and perspective. It has the resources of Anthropic itself at its disposal. And it has the perfect story attached to it, so there's a lot to win if it succeeds, and little to lose if it doesn't, since the failure can just be ignored and they can move on.

                          64kb@icosahedron.website6 This user is from outside of this forum
                          64kb@icosahedron.website6 This user is from outside of this forum
                          64kb@icosahedron.website
                          wrote last edited by
                          #38

                          @cwebber build many to throw away is the slop coding way.

                          Like LLMs in general it can sometimes be useful, but used a lot of resources, even more if you are not careful.

                          Still: port from one language to another is something they are at least fairly good for.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                            Note that this rewrite has a lot of resources at its disposal. The porting.md file has a ton of direction, more than historically an LLM can keep track of: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/46d3bc29f270fa881dd5730ef1549e88407701a5/docs/PORTING.md

                            But Anthropic acquired Bun, so I imagine this project has effectively as many tokens to use as it wants.

                            If this rewrite succeeds, this will effectively not only be a "fuck you Zig for not accepting my AIgen patches", it'll be a big headline and marketing story for Anthropic: look! Claude could rewrite Bun from Zig to Rust!

                            It's hard for me to read this then as anything but an experiment to see if Anthropic can get a big marketing boost in favor of vibecoding from.

                            jcaron@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jcaron@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jcaron@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39

                            @cwebber porting Bun from to rust is more than possible, Deno proved that rust is capable of building a JavaScript runtime. I agree with you, it looks like a "big headline" grab in the making.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                              But this won't be an ordinary vibecoding story if it succeeds, but it might *look that way* from a marketing perspective. It has the lead maintainer giving a *ton* of guidance and perspective. It has the resources of Anthropic itself at its disposal. And it has the perfect story attached to it, so there's a lot to win if it succeeds, and little to lose if it doesn't, since the failure can just be ignored and they can move on.

                              cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cwebber@social.coop
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              Update: Merged into main already https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30412

                              xan@xantronix.socialX 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                Update: Merged into main already https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/30412

                                xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                                xan@xantronix.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                                xan@xantronix.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #41

                                @cwebber Jesus Christ.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                  So the "Bun being a vibe coded rewrite from Zig to Rust" is a different story than I think it's being sold as, from everything I can see. It's worth seeing several events laid out back to back.

                                  - Zig has a no AI contributions policy. They've explained their rationale: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/
                                  - Bun has a fork of Zig with AI generated changes. Zig's developers explain why they aren't merging them, and that they have their own path to relevant improvements https://ziggit.dev/t/bun-s-zig-fork-got-4x-faster-compilation-times/15183/19
                                  - Anthropic acquires Bun https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone
                                  - Bun is working on an experimental rewrite from Zig to Rust using Claude driven by the Bun lead, now working for Anthropic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016880

                                  What does Bun's lead have to say about AIgen contributions to FOSS?

                                  > I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner)

                                  I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed. Slop will be a nostalgic relic of 2025 & 2026.

                                  favicon

                                  Nitter (xcancel.com)

                                  What can we make of this?

                                  fogti@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fogti@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fogti@chaos.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #42

                                  @cwebber It'll get interesting if/when Rust also commits to a "no AI contributions to the compiler + core" policy...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cwebber@social.coop
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #43

                                    @Gnuxie It's been Zig as long as I've known about it

                                    cwebber@social.coopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                      @Gnuxie It's been Zig as long as I've known about it

                                      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cwebber@social.coop
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #44

                                      @Gnuxie Along with Tigerbeetle, was one of the flagship Zig projects

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups