Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. STOP SENDING ME IPV8

STOP SENDING ME IPV8

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
45 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

    @IceWolf @patterfloof @LilaHexe April fools RFCs are at least funny to read, this is just painful and ignoring all lessons that could be learned from BOTH IPv4 and v6

    icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI This user is from outside of this forum
    icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI This user is from outside of this forum
    icewolf@masto.brightfur.net
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    @famfo @patterfloof @LilaHexe And like, OAuth?? Telemetry??? WTF

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

      @LilaHexe there's no way it isn't

      euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
      euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
      euph0r14@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @famfo @LilaHexe it’s 100% LLM generated / output, they tried to use emdashes in a ascii only text document 😭

      (Oh yeah and the writing style is absolutely how ChatGPT writes)

      Link Preview Image
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

        There are already vibe-coded implementations, you have to be kidding me

        famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
        famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
        famfo@frogs.lgbt
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

        euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK cyrevolt@mastodon.socialC cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

          NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

          euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          euph0r14@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @famfo but surely Google wouldn’t lie to me

          Link Preview Image
          famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE euph0r14@infosec.exchange

            @famfo but surely Google wouldn’t lie to me

            Link Preview Image
            famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
            famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
            famfo@frogs.lgbt
            wrote last edited by
            #29

            @Euph0r14 oh my fucking god it verbatim copied half the abstract

            arisunz@tech.lgbtA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • eloy@hsnl.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              eloy@hsnl.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              eloy@hsnl.social
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              @beowulf @hugh @famfo I can confirm these allegations

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                The absolute insanity of the multiple hallucinated additional RFCs WHICH ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND but cited as "critical dependencies"

                domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                domi@donotsta.re
                wrote last edited by
                #31

                @famfo@frogs.lgbt honestly my favourite part

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                  I'm slowly going insane over this

                  domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                  domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                  domi@donotsta.re
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @famfo@frogs.lgbt you and me both...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                    NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

                    kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kbruen@procial.tchncs.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33

                    @famfo@frogs.lgbt IETF is not doing a good job at all at making it look unofficial.

                    famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK kbruen@procial.tchncs.de

                      @famfo@frogs.lgbt IETF is not doing a good job at all at making it look unofficial.

                      famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                      famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                      famfo@frogs.lgbt
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      @kbruen there's a big banner

                      fogti@chaos.socialF microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                        @kbruen there's a big banner

                        fogti@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fogti@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fogti@chaos.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35

                        @famfo @kbruen where? https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html

                        famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • fogti@chaos.socialF fogti@chaos.social

                          @famfo @kbruen where? https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html

                          famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                          famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                          famfo@frogs.lgbt
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @fogti @kbruen oh, ffs, only on datatracker.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)

                          Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)

                          favicon

                          IETF Datatracker (datatracker.ietf.org)

                          microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                            @kbruen there's a big banner

                            microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                            microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                            microplastic@h.pronounmail.com
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37

                            @famfo @kbruen only on the datatracker, not as clear on archive if you don't know what an ietf draft makes

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                              @fogti @kbruen oh, ffs, only on datatracker.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)

                              Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)

                              favicon

                              IETF Datatracker (datatracker.ietf.org)

                              microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                              microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                              microplastic@h.pronounmail.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38

                              @famfo @kbruen this "task force" should "engineer" a better page on the "internet"

                              famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                @kbruen there's a big banner

                                kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kbruen@procial.tchncs.de
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                @famfo@frogs.lgbt Where? 😅 (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM microplastic@h.pronounmail.com

                                  @famfo @kbruen this "task force" should "engineer" a better page on the "internet"

                                  famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  famfo@frogs.lgbt
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @microplastic @kbruen I guess you usually don't go to the archive if you are searching for stuff, especially because it has no additional information like version history etc.

                                  kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                    @microplastic @kbruen I guess you usually don't go to the archive if you are searching for stuff, especially because it has no additional information like version history etc.

                                    kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kbruen@procial.tchncs.de
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41

                                    @famfo@frogs.lgbt @microplastic@h.pronounmail.com :')

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                      @Euph0r14 oh my fucking god it verbatim copied half the abstract

                                      arisunz@tech.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arisunz@tech.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arisunz@tech.lgbt
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @famfo what a perfect snapshot of the state of the internet in The Year Of Our Lord™ 2026

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                        @microplastic @kbruen I guess you usually don't go to the archive if you are searching for stuff, especially because it has no additional information like version history etc.

                                        microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        microplastic@h.pronounmail.com
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #43

                                        @famfo @kbruen this is a statement only an IETFhead like you would say

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                          NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

                                          cyrevolt@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cyrevolt@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cyrevolt@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #44

                                          @famfo Expiring in October this year already though?
                                          IPv10 must be on its way as a successor.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups