Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. STOP SENDING ME IPV8

STOP SENDING ME IPV8

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
45 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B beowulf@beosocial.de

    @famfo @hugh Maybe you should take a deep breath and just return to IPv6?

    hugh@social.crablab.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
    hugh@social.crablab.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
    hugh@social.crablab.uk
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @beowulf @famfo Take a Spezi, take a break

    Also: for famfo.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hugh@social.crablab.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
      hugh@social.crablab.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
      hugh@social.crablab.uk
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @beowulf @famfo ...no comment

      There's Spezi at CCCAC!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top

        @famfo ok yeah I thought it might be AI generated

        famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
        famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
        famfo@frogs.lgbt
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @LilaHexe there's no way it isn't

        lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

          @LilaHexe there's no way it isn't

          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @famfo I only had a glance at it, because even the premise is just fucked

          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top

            @famfo I only had a glance at it, because even the premise is just fucked

            lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
            lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
            lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @famfo gonna submit IPv67

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • hugh@social.crablab.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
              hugh@social.crablab.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
              hugh@social.crablab.uk
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @beowulf @famfo Root cause identified ✅

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top

                @famfo ok yeah I thought it might be AI generated

                patterfloof@meow.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                patterfloof@meow.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                patterfloof@meow.social
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @LilaHexe @famfo had to look at the date on it 'cos it sounded too much like an april fools that's onlt now been noticed outside the IETF

                icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                  The absolute insanity of the multiple hallucinated additional RFCs WHICH ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND but cited as "critical dependencies"

                  kookie@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kookie@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kookie@chaosfem.tw
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @famfo Beautiful

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • patterfloof@meow.socialP patterfloof@meow.social

                    @LilaHexe @famfo had to look at the date on it 'cos it sounded too much like an april fools that's onlt now been noticed outside the IETF

                    icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                    icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                    icewolf@masto.brightfur.net
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @patterfloof @LilaHexe @famfo Yeah my first thought was "...what. This has to be a joke. This cannot possibly be serious."

                    famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI icewolf@masto.brightfur.net

                      @patterfloof @LilaHexe @famfo Yeah my first thought was "...what. This has to be a joke. This cannot possibly be serious."

                      famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                      famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                      famfo@frogs.lgbt
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @IceWolf @patterfloof @LilaHexe April fools RFCs are at least funny to read, this is just painful and ignoring all lessons that could be learned from BOTH IPv4 and v6

                      icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                        @IceWolf @patterfloof @LilaHexe April fools RFCs are at least funny to read, this is just painful and ignoring all lessons that could be learned from BOTH IPv4 and v6

                        icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                        icewolf@masto.brightfur.netI This user is from outside of this forum
                        icewolf@masto.brightfur.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @famfo @patterfloof @LilaHexe And like, OAuth?? Telemetry??? WTF

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                          @LilaHexe there's no way it isn't

                          euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                          euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                          euph0r14@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @famfo @LilaHexe it’s 100% LLM generated / output, they tried to use emdashes in a ascii only text document 😭

                          (Oh yeah and the writing style is absolutely how ChatGPT writes)

                          Link Preview Image
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                            There are already vibe-coded implementations, you have to be kidding me

                            famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                            famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                            famfo@frogs.lgbt
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

                            euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK cyrevolt@mastodon.socialC cgnarne@hj.9fs.netC 4 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                              NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

                              euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                              euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                              euph0r14@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @famfo but surely Google wouldn’t lie to me

                              Link Preview Image
                              famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • euph0r14@infosec.exchangeE euph0r14@infosec.exchange

                                @famfo but surely Google wouldn’t lie to me

                                Link Preview Image
                                famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                                famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                                famfo@frogs.lgbt
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @Euph0r14 oh my fucking god it verbatim copied half the abstract

                                arisunz@tech.lgbtA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • eloy@hsnl.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  eloy@hsnl.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  eloy@hsnl.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  @beowulf @hugh @famfo I can confirm these allegations

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                    The absolute insanity of the multiple hallucinated additional RFCs WHICH ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND but cited as "critical dependencies"

                                    domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    domi@donotsta.re
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    @famfo@frogs.lgbt honestly my favourite part

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                      I'm slowly going insane over this

                                      domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      domi@donotsta.re
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @famfo@frogs.lgbt you and me both...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • famfo@frogs.lgbtF famfo@frogs.lgbt

                                        NOOOOOO, I've been boosted another post about this and FEDI, THIS IS A DRAFT STANDARD, NOT ENDORSED AND WITHOUT OFFICIAL STANDING!!! AAAAAaaaaaaaaa

                                        kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kbruen@procial.tchncs.de
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @famfo@frogs.lgbt IETF is not doing a good job at all at making it look unofficial.

                                        famfo@frogs.lgbtF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK kbruen@procial.tchncs.de

                                          @famfo@frogs.lgbt IETF is not doing a good job at all at making it look unofficial.

                                          famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          famfo@frogs.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          famfo@frogs.lgbt
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          @kbruen there's a big banner

                                          fogti@chaos.socialF microplastic@h.pronounmail.comM kbruen@procial.tchncs.deK 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups