STOP SENDING ME IPV8

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

The absolute insanity of the multiple hallucinated additional RFCs WHICH ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND but cited as "critical dependencies"

[beowulf@beosocial.de]

@famfo My ears are bleeding, please not so loud...

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

And now all the people going "ohhh the IETF has published IPv8", my brother in Christ, this is a DRAFT not representing ANY consensus

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

I'm slowly going insane over this

[radex@social.hackerspace.pl]

@famfo this draft does feel like psyop. what do they want to distract us from?!

[hugh@social.crablab.uk]

@beowulf @famfo is famfo okay?

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

There are already vibe-coded implementations, you have to be kidding me

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

@hugh @beowulf NO

[beowulf@beosocial.de]

@famfo @hugh Maybe you should take a deep breath and just return to IPv6?

[lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top]

@famfo ok yeah I thought it might be AI generated

[hugh@social.crablab.uk]

@beowulf @famfo Take a Spezi, take a break

Also: for famfo.

[hugh@social.crablab.uk]

@beowulf @famfo ...no comment

There's Spezi at CCCAC!

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

@LilaHexe there's no way it isn't

[lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top]

@famfo I only had a glance at it, because even the premise is just fucked

[lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top]

@famfo gonna submit IPv67

[hugh@social.crablab.uk]

@beowulf @famfo Root cause identified

[patterfloof@meow.social]

@LilaHexe @famfo had to look at the date on it 'cos it sounded too much like an april fools that's onlt now been noticed outside the IETF

[kookie@chaosfem.tw]

@famfo Beautiful

[icewolf@masto.brightfur.net]

@patterfloof @LilaHexe @famfo Yeah my first thought was "...what. This has to be a joke. This cannot possibly be serious."

[famfo@frogs.lgbt]

@IceWolf @patterfloof @LilaHexe April fools RFCs are at least funny to read, this is just painful and ignoring all lessons that could be learned from BOTH IPv4 and v6