Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

    @artemis (also, the "american system" of manufacturing was literally designed around preventing exactly that sort of problem...
    *in 1820* yet, here we are again, somehow.)

    su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
    su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
    su_liam@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #58

    @miss_rodent Nothing quite like a regime that altogether ignores the existing system.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

      So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

      Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

      lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lightfighter@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #59

      @artemis Iran builds 100 missile per month, US produces maybe 20 interceptors per month. Not difficult math there.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

        Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

        All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

        krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
        krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
        krypt3ia@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #60

        @artemis https://archive.org/details/ird059

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

          Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

          All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

          josh@hactivedirectory.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
          josh@hactivedirectory.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
          josh@hactivedirectory.com
          wrote last edited by
          #61

          @artemis see also "Train derailed by penny on track."

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

            Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

            All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

            chuff@bark.wolp.chatC This user is from outside of this forum
            chuff@bark.wolp.chatC This user is from outside of this forum
            chuff@bark.wolp.chat
            wrote last edited by
            #62

            The world changed, and the US military's plan didn't. We've seen how cheap and powerful consumer tech has gotten, military grade is a waste at this point compared to cheap easy to make good enough tech.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

              Frankly, the entire military-industrial complex IS a con. That huge military budget sure has gone to a lot of boondoggles & overpriced crap, huh?

              This has been true for a while, but just like everything else right now, we are reaching the point where the bottom is going to fall out because everything has been so eroded over time.

              ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
              ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
              ska@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #63

              @artemis The Pentagon failed 7 audits in a row, and is currently unable to account for 63% of its budget.

              63%.

              I don't think this money is going into weapons or geopolitical strategy meetings.

              n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                It's not a great time to be a "military superpower." All of your equipment costs too much, is overcomplicated & over-engineered & everyone involved is complacent & overconfident.

                This is like in Stargate when the Asgardians ask the humans for help because "we're too smart to think of the silly things you humans do, like using projectile weapons."

                cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cstamp@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #64

                @artemis The US had also fired the people who knew their jobs and fancy equipment doesn’t replace competence.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • evilotto@sfba.socialE evilotto@sfba.social

                  @artemis see also Millennium Challenge 2002.

                  US forces get roasted in a wargame by an opposing force using unconventional tactics, pentagon brass declared unconventional tactics against the rules and declares that they won anyway.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Millennium Challenge 2002 - Wikipedia

                  favicon

                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                  akamran@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  akamran@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  akamran@indieweb.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #65

                  @evilotto @artemis I remember when that happened! I remember reading about it and thinking we're going to get our asses handed to us by a bunch of guys with rocks some day -- and lo and behold, that day is nigh.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                    I think the entire world is going to watch as it is proven that for all its swagger & all its fancy equipment, the US military is perhaps not *quite* the unstoppable juggernaut it claims to be.

                    vervain@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vervain@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vervain@sunny.garden
                    wrote last edited by
                    #66

                    @artemis

                    (o please o please o please)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                      The Trump administration is possibly the most hopped-up on their own propaganda administration the US has ever seen. These people are drunk on it.

                      They think they have a literally invincible army, & they believe that it is impossible for white people to lose to brown folks (among many, many other false beliefs that are going to kick them in the ass).

                      vervain@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vervain@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vervain@sunny.garden
                      wrote last edited by
                      #67

                      @artemis

                      Kick us all in the ass though.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                        Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                        All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                        n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                        n_dimension@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #68

                        @artemis

                        I remember US held wargames in the gulf, where the red team was commanded by Commander Van Ripper. "Millenium Challenge 2002".
                        The "bad guys" absolutely trashed the "good guys" because they weren't playing fair, instead of comms, they used motorcycle runners, and swarmed the fleet with tiny attack boats (pre drones).
                        The exercises was halted and "good guys" were allowed to win.

                        Looks like 24 years has passed and the US has learned absolutely nothing.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Millennium Challenge: The Real Story of a Corrupted Military Exercise and its Legacy

                        Since the infamous Millennium Challenge 2002 (MC ’02) concept-development exercise, run by the now-defunct U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM), was leaked

                        favicon

                        War on the Rocks (warontherocks.com)

                        #iran #invasion #failure

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

                          @artemis Asymmetric warfare is a real thing.

                          Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                          favicon

                          (www.raf.mod.uk)

                          Just one example.

                          The British RAF celebrates taking down two drones (I'll take those to be Shahed-136 drones, unit cost about $35.000) with two ASRAAM (Unit cost >£200,000) by scrambling a F35 (probably the F-35B Lightning II, unit cost $109 million to $135 million+) and two Typhoons (unit cost about $200 million to $300 million).

                          So that's roughly (not calculating fuel, deployment, training, personnel, etc. and taking the cheapest known costs)

                          $264.857 + $264.857 + $109.000.000 + $200.000.000 + $200.000.000 =

                          $509.529.714 versus $70.000.

                          LMAO.

                          sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sabik@rants.au
                          wrote last edited by
                          #69

                          @avuko @artemis
                          Whoever got the contract to supply that $509.529.714 of gear is happy, anyway 😢
                          #uspol #ukpol #war #profiteering

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                            @artemis The Pentagon failed 7 audits in a row, and is currently unable to account for 63% of its budget.

                            63%.

                            I don't think this money is going into weapons or geopolitical strategy meetings.

                            n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                            n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                            n_dimension@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #70

                            @artemis @ska

                            UK pioneer #Hacker Gary McKinnon fought an extradition to the US for 10 years.
                            Where he would be charged with crimes totalling 70 years jail.

                            One of the things McKinnon allegedly saw, were offworld personnel crew rosters.
                            This was back in the modem days and he was loading screens, so no files (before digital cameras)

                            Its potentially plausible the "missing" Pentagon budget is off-world special programs.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                              @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                              That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                              Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                              simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              simplicator@federate.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #71

                              @faithisleaping @artemis Chief designer Kelly Johnson so regretted that plane that he threatened to quit Lockheed if they kept selling it. I guess the compromise was they would only sell it overseas 😞

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                                That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                                Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                                simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                simplicator@federate.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #72

                                @faithisleaping @artemis If there’s any saving grace, it’s that the #MST3K episode on Starfighters has one of the most hilarious lead-in skits of all time 🙂

                                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • simplicator@federate.socialS simplicator@federate.social

                                  @faithisleaping @artemis If there’s any saving grace, it’s that the #MST3K episode on Starfighters has one of the most hilarious lead-in skits of all time 🙂

                                  faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  faithisleaping@anarres.family
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #73

                                  @Simplicator @artemis Oh, that whole episode is a riot. One of my all-time favorites. The movie riffing and the host segments are all top-notch.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • halfwitamerican@beige.partyH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    halfwitamerican@beige.partyH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    halfwitamerican@beige.party
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #74

                                    @sidereal @TeflonTrout @artemis This thread is giving me life right now 🤣

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                      @artemis i was watching a video on how well the US tanks were doing in Ukraine. Aside from the fact 90+% of them have been destroyed, one little nugget of info made me understand so much about US military doctrine and it's overwhelming weakness.

                                      An M1 Abrams tank, if you fill the fuel tank in the morning, and it sits idling all day (to power target systems and weapons etc...) by sundown the tank is empty, even if it doesn't move. How do you provide the logistics for that madness ?!??

                                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burnitdown@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #75

                                      @quixoticgeek @artemis

                                      one of the things about tanks is that, without a continuous supply of fuel, that's what will happen. that's partly why Hitler's tanks didn't fare well in Russia.

                                      another thing is that a tank's armor only protects against shrapnel and small arms fire at best. if you can't go hull-down anywhere, you're an easy target for artillery and other tanks. every tank game of the past ten years has made this a crucial part of surviving the round. if you treat it like an impenetrable suit of armor, you will die.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                        The US is a hollow nation. Hollowed out over decades. In the coming years, everyone is about to find out that there is not much left.

                                        We haven't quite reached the point where they try to strip the last of the drapes & furniture out of the White House to sell, but it feels like we're close, doesn't it? They are stealing & grifting absolutely anything & everything that they can.

                                        burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        burnitdown@beige.party
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #76

                                        @artemis nobody bothered with that kind of tedious work, they demolished part of the White House instead. i think they should just leave the rubble there and call it a day.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                          @artemis Oh, it always has been. See also the F-104 Starfighter.

                                          That plane was so bad it got the nickname "widowmaker" from the Germans because so many pilots died flying them. The reputation was so bad that the US (or Lockheed?) paid for an entire Top Gun knock-off movie to be made about them to try and salvage their reputation.

                                          Fix the problems? No. Just make a movie about how awesome our fancy plane is.

                                          burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          burnitdown@beige.party
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #77

                                          @faithisleaping @artemis pilots didn't want the F-35 because it's like a flying pipe organ, it has so much dashboard.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups