Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines.

My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 24 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

    @nyquildotorg agreed

    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    @minego @nyquildotorg Could be worse, they could go for she/her.

    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

      My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

      Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

      I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

      I miss actual intelligence

      tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
      tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
      tjbutt58@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      @minego my zoologist friends at uni were carefully instructed not to anthropomorphise animals. AI is even riskier, as we may start to care about it, and that will definitely be a selling point. 💀

      janneke@todon.nlJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

        My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

        Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

        I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

        I miss actual intelligence

        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
        mdione@en.osm.town
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        @minego TBF, I know it's a it, and I kept misgendering it as 'he' the three morning I used it. Remember Eliza: "Can you leave the room?".

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

          @minego @nyquildotorg Could be worse, they could go for she/her.

          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @minego @nyquildotorg (This is not to say using he/his is great, but every time i see men using feminine pronouns for the slop machine, it’s extra gross)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe

            @minego I, as non native speaker, have problems with it. What was the form? Everytime I just say "cladue did this and that" and feel bad about it, as they gave it human name and therefore I sound like I'm talking about a human. How would you start a sentence where the LLM was not priorly introduced?

            mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
            mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
            mdione@en.osm.town
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            @mms @minego maybe we should call it Blahude?

            mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

              My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

              Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

              I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

              I miss actual intelligence

              peterfr@mastodon.artP This user is from outside of this forum
              peterfr@mastodon.artP This user is from outside of this forum
              peterfr@mastodon.art
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              @minego weirdest shocking thing i overheard was the following:

              A: copilot isn’t really helpful

              B: well i found out, if you’re really nice to it, if you say please and thank you a lot and even „dear copilot“ the results become better

              A: ah, thanks for that hint.

              i never talked to these people again. probably never will.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                I miss actual intelligence

                stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                stveje@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                @minego The most disturbing thing to me is that, if we were to genuinely believe that these models were conscious individuals, then using them would be slavery and exploitation. Thankfully they're not conscious, of course, but the fact that so many people blithely use these models while pretending they are (or soon will be) conscious is still incredibly disturbing and says something about us.

                tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                  My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                  Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                  I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                  I miss actual intelligence

                  datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  datarama@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @minego What else would you call it?

                  toriver@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mdione@en.osm.townM mdione@en.osm.town

                    @mms @minego maybe we should call it Blahude?

                    mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    @mdione @minego TBF I'm thinking of caling it "Atntropic Claude" to accent that it's a product. Just like when I always write "Google Youtube' or "Microsoft GIthub" to show that it's a not a nice, indie service.

                    minego@pdx.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • datarama@hachyderm.ioD datarama@hachyderm.io

                      @minego What else would you call it?

                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      toriver@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @datarama @minego People caught in the psychosis refer to them as «he» or «she» depending what personality they have decided the AI has.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                        My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                        Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                        I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                        I miss actual intelligence

                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        @minego

                        Type 1 AI Psychosis from your colleagues It seems 😟

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stveje@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          @forse @minego That too. But I think there's a difference between realizing that the system and the rich and powerful are exploiting everyone and everything, and realizing that lots of ordinary people are apparently just fine with having their own personal slave.

                          I mean, it's not surprising, as nothing is these days, but it's disturbing.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                            My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                            Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                            I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                            I miss actual intelligence

                            deixis9@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                            deixis9@beige.partyD This user is from outside of this forum
                            deixis9@beige.party
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            @minego I noticed the slightly more positive term 'Text Processor' for it today.

                            I like 'automatic writing', but that's human operated (the uninitiated should see Yeats)

                            Inteligence is a misnomer.

                            Too late though, the framing is complete?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe

                              @mdione @minego TBF I'm thinking of caling it "Atntropic Claude" to accent that it's a product. Just like when I always write "Google Youtube' or "Microsoft GIthub" to show that it's a not a nice, indie service.

                              minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              minego@pdx.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              @mms
                              @mdione I like this

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                I miss actual intelligence

                                b3lt3r@mastodon.b3lt3r.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                b3lt3r@mastodon.b3lt3r.comB This user is from outside of this forum
                                b3lt3r@mastodon.b3lt3r.com
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                @minego actual intelligence? You mean ai? 😊

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                  My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                  Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                  I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                  I miss actual intelligence

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  phosphenes@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #32

                                  @minego

                                  You are literally erasing my AI with your wrong pronouns.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • stveje@mstdn.socialS stveje@mstdn.social

                                    @minego The most disturbing thing to me is that, if we were to genuinely believe that these models were conscious individuals, then using them would be slavery and exploitation. Thankfully they're not conscious, of course, but the fact that so many people blithely use these models while pretending they are (or soon will be) conscious is still incredibly disturbing and says something about us.

                                    tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tcatinreality@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #33

                                    @stveje @minego

                                    Yes, it says that a very large portion of humanity would happily be exploitative slavers if it were easy and acceptable enough.

                                    Of course, we already know this from centuries (millennia?) of history with actual human slavery.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT tjbutt58@infosec.exchange

                                      @minego my zoologist friends at uni were carefully instructed not to anthropomorphise animals. AI is even riskier, as we may start to care about it, and that will definitely be a selling point. 💀

                                      janneke@todon.nlJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      janneke@todon.nlJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      janneke@todon.nl
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #34

                                      @tjbutt58 @minego
                                      Yes, students are often still indoctrinated to view non-human animals as automatons, notwithstanding decades of research proving their feelings, emotions, thoughts and capabilities of tool creation, tool use, and planning.

                                      tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                        My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                        Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                        I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                        I miss actual intelligence

                                        quinoa0@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        quinoa0@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        quinoa0@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #35

                                        @minego people actually expect us to refer to a text predictor which is nor intelligent nor even an actual robot with a human pronoun?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                          My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                          Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                          I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                          I miss actual intelligence

                                          msokolov@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          msokolov@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          msokolov@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #36

                                          @minego what pronoun so they use for it!

                                          minego@pdx.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups