Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines.

My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 24 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.orgN nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.org

    @minego gross

    minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    minego@pdx.social
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @nyquildotorg agreed

    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

      My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

      Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

      I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

      I miss actual intelligence

      zombiegopher@gamepad.clubZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zombiegopher@gamepad.clubZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zombiegopher@gamepad.club
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @minego ... What in the everloving fuck...

      minego@pdx.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zombiegopher@gamepad.clubZ zombiegopher@gamepad.club

        @minego ... What in the everloving fuck...

        minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        minego@pdx.social
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @ZombieGopher right?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

          @nyquildotorg They used he/him for it

          jocafa@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jocafa@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jocafa@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @minego @nyquildotorg That's messed up.

          minego@pdx.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • scream@bots.robots.rodeoS This user is from outside of this forum
            scream@bots.robots.rodeoS This user is from outside of this forum
            scream@bots.robots.rodeo
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @Bumblefish AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jocafa@mastodon.socialJ jocafa@mastodon.social

              @minego @nyquildotorg That's messed up.

              minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              minego@pdx.social
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @jocafa
              @nyquildotorg Yup.

              I don't blame the person who did it. The companies pushing this use gendered names and pronouns. They want people to treat it like a person. The lies these companies are pushing is the problem.

              jocafa@mastodon.socialJ urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                @jocafa
                @nyquildotorg Yup.

                I don't blame the person who did it. The companies pushing this use gendered names and pronouns. They want people to treat it like a person. The lies these companies are pushing is the problem.

                jocafa@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jocafa@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jocafa@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @minego @nyquildotorg You know what they *could* do? ... Hire people. Take care of the people they have.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                  My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                  Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                  I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                  I miss actual intelligence

                  mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @minego I, as non native speaker, have problems with it. What was the form? Everytime I just say "cladue did this and that" and feel bad about it, as they gave it human name and therefore I sound like I'm talking about a human. How would you start a sentence where the LLM was not priorly introduced?

                  mdione@en.osm.townM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                    @nyquildotorg agreed

                    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @minego @nyquildotorg Could be worse, they could go for she/her.

                    ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                      My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                      Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                      I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                      I miss actual intelligence

                      tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tjbutt58@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @minego my zoologist friends at uni were carefully instructed not to anthropomorphise animals. AI is even riskier, as we may start to care about it, and that will definitely be a selling point. 💀

                      janneke@todon.nlJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                        My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                        Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                        I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                        I miss actual intelligence

                        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdione@en.osm.town
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @minego TBF, I know it's a it, and I kept misgendering it as 'he' the three morning I used it. Remember Eliza: "Can you leave the room?".

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

                          @minego @nyquildotorg Could be worse, they could go for she/her.

                          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @minego @nyquildotorg (This is not to say using he/his is great, but every time i see men using feminine pronouns for the slop machine, it’s extra gross)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe

                            @minego I, as non native speaker, have problems with it. What was the form? Everytime I just say "cladue did this and that" and feel bad about it, as they gave it human name and therefore I sound like I'm talking about a human. How would you start a sentence where the LLM was not priorly introduced?

                            mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mdione@en.osm.town
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            @mms @minego maybe we should call it Blahude?

                            mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                              My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                              Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                              I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                              I miss actual intelligence

                              peterfr@mastodon.artP This user is from outside of this forum
                              peterfr@mastodon.artP This user is from outside of this forum
                              peterfr@mastodon.art
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @minego weirdest shocking thing i overheard was the following:

                              A: copilot isn’t really helpful

                              B: well i found out, if you’re really nice to it, if you say please and thank you a lot and even „dear copilot“ the results become better

                              A: ah, thanks for that hint.

                              i never talked to these people again. probably never will.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                I miss actual intelligence

                                stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                stveje@mstdn.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @minego The most disturbing thing to me is that, if we were to genuinely believe that these models were conscious individuals, then using them would be slavery and exploitation. Thankfully they're not conscious, of course, but the fact that so many people blithely use these models while pretending they are (or soon will be) conscious is still incredibly disturbing and says something about us.

                                tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                  My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                  Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                  I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                  I miss actual intelligence

                                  datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  datarama@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  datarama@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @minego What else would you call it?

                                  toriver@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mdione@en.osm.townM mdione@en.osm.town

                                    @mms @minego maybe we should call it Blahude?

                                    mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @mdione @minego TBF I'm thinking of caling it "Atntropic Claude" to accent that it's a product. Just like when I always write "Google Youtube' or "Microsoft GIthub" to show that it's a not a nice, indie service.

                                    minego@pdx.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • datarama@hachyderm.ioD datarama@hachyderm.io

                                      @minego What else would you call it?

                                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      toriver@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @datarama @minego People caught in the psychosis refer to them as «he» or «she» depending what personality they have decided the AI has.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                                        My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                                        Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                                        I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                                        I miss actual intelligence

                                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @minego

                                        Type 1 AI Psychosis from your colleagues It seems 😟

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stveje@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stveje@mstdn.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @forse @minego That too. But I think there's a difference between realizing that the system and the rich and powerful are exploiting everyone and everything, and realizing that lots of ordinary people are apparently just fine with having their own personal slave.

                                          I mean, it's not surprising, as nothing is these days, but it's disturbing.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups