Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things."

Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
36 Posts 31 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

    Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @Daojoan

    we're getting palantir toilets soon so...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

      Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

      cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
      cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
      cy@fedicy.us.to
      wrote last edited by
      #15
      That's sure not how I use the term elitist, but yeah. People are so easily swayed by a down home country accent.

      What's her name at PhilosophyTube has a pretty interesting angle on what's happening here:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqPd6MShV1o

      Not entirely people's fault, but definitely working against any hope of our future existence.
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dp0@mastodon.socialD dp0@mastodon.social

        @Daojoan It is just a new approach to an old dilemma: Authoritarianism is based on fraud and fraud requires intellectual superiority; i.e., the fraudster needs to know something the deceived doesn't. Hence, knowledgeable people are a threat for autocrats.

        In the past, access to knowledge was limited, most people couldn't even read. But things have changed and education and knowledge are more accessible. So they've to "pollute" the knowledge through fake information and to shame knowledge.

        mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mrundkvist@archaeo.social
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        @DP0 @Daojoan
        Sorry, no. Poor people in Sweden have had excellent access to information and education for 80 years. The fascist voters have turned away willingly from that and prefer online propaganda channels.

        #fascism #democracy

        dp0@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ariaflame@masto.aiA ariaflame@masto.ai

          @Daojoan A man who has probably never set foot in a supermarket in his life.

          trimtab@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          trimtab@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          trimtab@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @ariaflame @Daojoan
          Indeed. A man who talked about groceries as if he had only learned the word for the first time a few minutes before his speech....

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

            Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

            nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
            nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
            nini@oldbytes.space
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @Daojoan So they're anti-intellectualists but calling folk "intellectuals" has too many syllables so it's just "elitist".

            arafel@mas.toA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

              Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

              nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              nicolai@babka.social
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @Daojoan what it really means is „has access to methods of thinking that not all people have but which are seen as mandatory for being heard and being able to speak politically“. And that is a real cause that unfortunately mostly terrible people really for. Other people do not really rally for it because it is an uncomfortable truth that one actually needs that method and that we indeed exclude people who can’t use it and that there is no good answer that could make them feel actually able to participate instead of just technically able to participate but without any chance of being heard.

              nicolai@babka.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nicolai@babka.socialN nicolai@babka.social

                @Daojoan what it really means is „has access to methods of thinking that not all people have but which are seen as mandatory for being heard and being able to speak politically“. And that is a real cause that unfortunately mostly terrible people really for. Other people do not really rally for it because it is an uncomfortable truth that one actually needs that method and that we indeed exclude people who can’t use it and that there is no good answer that could make them feel actually able to participate instead of just technically able to participate but without any chance of being heard.

                nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nicolai@babka.social
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @Daojoan I wrote small uni papers and essays about this question 15 years ago. Maybe it is time to update it with the current events and tell that story again

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                  Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                  konstruct@woof.techK This user is from outside of this forum
                  konstruct@woof.techK This user is from outside of this forum
                  konstruct@woof.tech
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  @Daojoan "elitism" is just a fancy name for gatekeeping and bragging about something behind those gates

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                    Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                    yngmar@social.tchncs.deY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yngmar@social.tchncs.deY This user is from outside of this forum
                    yngmar@social.tchncs.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @Daojoan Especially young, female people, as it turns out.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                      Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                      rogzilla71@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rogzilla71@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rogzilla71@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @Daojoan Yep. That's how it works. For those on the right, "elites" are smart people. For those on the left, "elites" are rich people.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                        Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                        scipoltech@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scipoltech@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scipoltech@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @Daojoan The language and psychology at play is utterly bizarre... on the plus side, here in a UK by-election an "elitist" smart female plumber representing the Green party just beat a far right pseudo-academic "man of the people" backed by billionaires.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • nini@oldbytes.spaceN nini@oldbytes.space

                          @Daojoan So they're anti-intellectualists but calling folk "intellectuals" has too many syllables so it's just "elitist".

                          arafel@mas.toA This user is from outside of this forum
                          arafel@mas.toA This user is from outside of this forum
                          arafel@mas.to
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @nini @Daojoan Possibly it's also harder to sell "I'm against intelligence," while "we're against elitists" is easier - and vaguer, you can turn it into anything you want with a bit of creativity.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                            Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                            aronsilver@indieauthors.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aronsilver@indieauthors.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aronsilver@indieauthors.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @Daojoan nowadays I often feel elitist for having the audicity to grow up as a white man with a functional job and family. If everyone already judges me for it anyway, what am I supposed to do different?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM mrundkvist@archaeo.social

                              @DP0 @Daojoan
                              Sorry, no. Poor people in Sweden have had excellent access to information and education for 80 years. The fascist voters have turned away willingly from that and prefer online propaganda channels.

                              #fascism #democracy

                              dp0@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dp0@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dp0@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @mrundkvist @Daojoan
                              That is actually what I said: People turning away from information is exactly what I meant when speaking of the new means. Everyone has access to information and knowledge, so people need to be instigated to turn away from it. And this done by providing false information and creating doubt regarding the accessible real and factual information.

                              In the past, poverty and oppression were easy means to keep people uneducated. Today, more proactive ways are required.

                              mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                                Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                                mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mkj@social.mkj.earth
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @Daojoan Sticks by their choices and morals even when doing so isn't perfectly convenient? *Definitely* elitist.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dp0@mastodon.socialD dp0@mastodon.social

                                  @mrundkvist @Daojoan
                                  That is actually what I said: People turning away from information is exactly what I meant when speaking of the new means. Everyone has access to information and knowledge, so people need to be instigated to turn away from it. And this done by providing false information and creating doubt regarding the accessible real and factual information.

                                  In the past, poverty and oppression were easy means to keep people uneducated. Today, more proactive ways are required.

                                  mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mrundkvist@archaeo.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @DP0 @Daojoan
                                  Why then didn't you and I turn away? We have the same access.

                                  dp0@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H halaana@mastodon.social

                                    @ariaflame There's actual royalty from major countries that are more connected to people's daily lives.

                                    larsbrinkhoff@mastodon.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    larsbrinkhoff@mastodon.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    larsbrinkhoff@mastodon.sdf.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @Halaana @ariaflame Norway has left the chat.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM mrundkvist@archaeo.social

                                      @DP0 @Daojoan
                                      Why then didn't you and I turn away? We have the same access.

                                      dp0@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dp0@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dp0@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @mrundkvist @Daojoan What makes you think we couldn't turn away, too? There are many reasons, why we haven't yet: maybe we were not the targeted audience (i.e., too left to be flipped), we were not sufficiently exposed (no Facebook, no Shitter, etc), we were too proficient in the field on which the disinformation was spread, etc.

                                      Disinformation works like a virus: if you don't have the receptors, you're immune. But make no mistake: there may be a virus out there matching your receptors.

                                      mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                                        Love how "elitist" now just means "has the audacity to know things." Went to university? Elitist. Read a book? Elitist. Can point to a country on a map? Elitist. Meanwhile a man with a gold toilet is a man of the people.

                                        smutmag@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        smutmag@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        smutmag@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #32

                                        @Daojoan It's not elitist to go to university. It's elitist to believe the only way you can prove you are smart or educated is to give tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for a piece of paper with your name on it. Our entire labor market and social culture is based on that notion. And like, I think the viewing of Trump as a man of the people is dumb, too...but this post is dangerously close to equating poor with dumb. And I think that's probably what people are referring to.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dp0@mastodon.socialD dp0@mastodon.social

                                          @mrundkvist @Daojoan What makes you think we couldn't turn away, too? There are many reasons, why we haven't yet: maybe we were not the targeted audience (i.e., too left to be flipped), we were not sufficiently exposed (no Facebook, no Shitter, etc), we were too proficient in the field on which the disinformation was spread, etc.

                                          Disinformation works like a virus: if you don't have the receptors, you're immune. But make no mistake: there may be a virus out there matching your receptors.

                                          mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mrundkvist@archaeo.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          @DP0 @Daojoan
                                          So you mean that education doesn't help. This suggests to me that it's a pretty bad idea to let me vote.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups