Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown.

People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
209 Posts 64 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF frutigeraero00@mastodon.social

    @CiaraNi Also it could be a good way to source all artists here on the internet. A good practice we should be encouraging now even more because of ai.

    frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    frutigeraero00@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #83

    @CiaraNi Also, it reminds me when there was this bot boom accounts, we were discouraged at first, but i will keep finding ways to spot ai content, directly and indirectly, i will not let stupid people to get omw, the more informated we keep, the better, keep the fight on!

    frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF frutigeraero00@mastodon.social

      @CiaraNi @stekopf @VerenaRupp https://mastodon.social/@Adrenochrome/116437261511916461

      stekopf@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      stekopf@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      stekopf@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #84

      @FrutigerAero00 @CiaraNi @VerenaRupp

      I was also doubting whether it's real or AI (it has to be a quite big droplet for such a solid crown - or maybe it were two?).
      I can't confirm the image, but I trust the poster.

      So, if this is any good, then it - again - shows how important trust is.

      frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF ciarani@mastodon.greenC naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF frutigeraero00@mastodon.social

        @CiaraNi Also, it reminds me when there was this bot boom accounts, we were discouraged at first, but i will keep finding ways to spot ai content, directly and indirectly, i will not let stupid people to get omw, the more informated we keep, the better, keep the fight on!

        frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        frutigeraero00@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #85

        @CiaraNi And now today, i've learned a new scammy way to put genai that seems reliable, which is, putting fake names on the post so it seems valid.

        We need to start asking for link sources for this kind of photos and art!

        ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

          People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

          remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          remittancegirl@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          remittancegirl@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #86

          @CiaraNi Amazingly well stated and exemplified!

          ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • capnthommo@c.imC capnthommo@c.im

            @weirdmustard @CiaraNi it's certainly making me question every image I see of a species new to me. Not only birds.

            weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
            weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
            weirdmustard@flipping.rocks
            wrote last edited by
            #87

            @capnthommo @CiaraNi Cant count the times I've silently accused ppl of posting AI pics of especially beautiful and colorful insects before looking at some other observations and finding that yea, sometimes that species is really that vividly colorful. Doesn't help that photo editors now use "AI" to enhance details either.

            ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stekopf@mstdn.socialS stekopf@mstdn.social

              @FrutigerAero00 @CiaraNi @VerenaRupp

              I was also doubting whether it's real or AI (it has to be a quite big droplet for such a solid crown - or maybe it were two?).
              I can't confirm the image, but I trust the poster.

              So, if this is any good, then it - again - shows how important trust is.

              frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              frutigeraero00@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #88

              @stekopf @CiaraNi @VerenaRupp Yeah, its normal if you see an image online and post it bc you think its real. Just like when they gave you a fake bill (or banknote?)

              But to leave doubts it would be a good practice to leave sources with links to verify it. It benefits everyone if we are now more careful linking and sourcing images and content.

              ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                dsilverz@calckey.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                dsilverz@calckey.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                dsilverz@calckey.world
                wrote last edited by
                #89

                @CiaraNi@mastodon.green

                This makes me wonder: to which extent is the Macaulay Library (Cornell Lab of Ornithology) curated enough so these photos are all real-world moments of real-world avians? I ask this because, as of recently, I've been using it as a image search engine for pictures of Strigidae (true owls) especially for drawing purposes (art based on real aspects of real species).

                Many of the amazing photos I've been finding there contains EXIF data disclosing hardware (camera) and geographical (location) info, which (especially camera and sensors info) is some evidence that these are real photos and not AI-generated pictures...

                ...but I'm also aware that metadata can be counterfeited, seemingly non-captive scenes (a feeling of wrath emerges inside me every time I see photos of owls in captivity and/or chained/bound because they're meant to be free) can be staged, our senses can be deceived... Welp, a constant Cartesian conundrum that just ends up pushing me more into Luciferian-Gnosticism because, in the end of the day, nothing truly exists in this damn cosmic existence.

                ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                  @RalphBassfeld Yes, deeper and longer text attracts questions now, thanks to all the unnecessarily wordy AI slop being generated. It's a difficult one. The use and abuse of AI means we have credible reason to doubt incredible content. We question a text or photo. If it's not AI, then we have 'accused' someone unfairly. If it is AI, then we have 'exposed' deceit fairly. We can't know which until we pose the question.

                  arratoon@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                  arratoon@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                  arratoon@beige.party
                  wrote last edited by
                  #90

                  @CiaraNi @RalphBassfeld “Unnecessarily wordy” - shit, I think In Search of Lost Time may be AI slop too! 😉

                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF frutigeraero00@mastodon.social

                    @CiaraNi My father when he saw the image, an intellectual: waterdrops don't create that shape on a concave surface, only when its flat.

                    kreatorfangirls@metalhead.clubK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kreatorfangirls@metalhead.clubK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kreatorfangirls@metalhead.club
                    wrote last edited by
                    #91

                    @FrutigerAero00 @CiaraNi The bird's head is convex when seen from the outside.

                    But what's in that image still doesn't match anything from the fluid mechanics I learned in school.

                    frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF ciarani@mastodon.greenC 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW weirdmustard@flipping.rocks

                      @CiaraNi We've started seeing rare species being uploaded to iNaturalist and other citizen science platforms and then it turns out it's AI and I just don't see whyyyy people are doing that. Like No, your AI imagination of a rare insect isn't just as good as someone finding a living specimen, what do you mean. Who profits from that. Who wants to see a "photo" of a fake bird. What's going on.

                      oisin@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                      oisin@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                      oisin@mastodon.ie
                      wrote last edited by
                      #92

                      @weirdmustard @CiaraNi What! OMG

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                        People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                        oisin@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oisin@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oisin@mastodon.ie
                        wrote last edited by
                        #93

                        @CiaraNi That's shite.

                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                          @fgraver @stveje If I am wrong, I will rush to correct myself. But all signs point to it being faked. I don't know how we 100% irrefutably prove something was AI-manipulated, as some have requested, but a verifiable original source of a real image would at least disprove it. But there is none so far.

                          fgraver@hcommons.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fgraver@hcommons.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fgraver@hcommons.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #94

                          @CiaraNi @stveje Based on what you and others have pointed out, I doubt you’re wrong. Unfortunately.

                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • stveje@mstdn.socialS stveje@mstdn.social

                            @fgraver @CiaraNi I couldn't tell if it was real or not at first either. I thought it looked too perfect to be true, but I really wasn't sure. I had to read the comments to convince myself it was AI, and it makes me so sad that we can't just enjoy pretty/funny pictures of cute birbs anymore.

                            fgraver@hcommons.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fgraver@hcommons.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fgraver@hcommons.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #95

                            @stveje @CiaraNi Me too.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                              People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                              elaterite@mastoart.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                              elaterite@mastoart.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                              elaterite@mastoart.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #96

                              @CiaraNi I'm not sure it's AI. It looks more like a poorly done composite to me. I would guess AI would do a better job, maybe? Totally agree with you on what AI has done to trust.

                              ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                It's not, of course, generative AI that's deceiving people. It's the humans using AI to generate fake images and the humans who pass the fake images off as their own photos who are deceiving other humans.

                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #97

                                @CiaraNi "it's the human who shoots the gun"
                                As for right now (and forever and ever, by the very nature of it) the main purpose of AIgen is to make things quick without effort. The only constant and without a sliver of doubt purpose is what things it does, which is generate very accurate images of something that doesn't exist, without effort. Making images for something that doesn't exist in a quick and easy way is, quite literally, the wet dream of scammers.

                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                                  @CiaraNi "it's the human who shoots the gun"
                                  As for right now (and forever and ever, by the very nature of it) the main purpose of AIgen is to make things quick without effort. The only constant and without a sliver of doubt purpose is what things it does, which is generate very accurate images of something that doesn't exist, without effort. Making images for something that doesn't exist in a quick and easy way is, quite literally, the wet dream of scammers.

                                  nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #98

                                  @CiaraNi If the machine was a thing that reads your dreams, or the images you make on your head, and puts them on a screen, this would be a very different story.
                                  But nope, this machine isn't about "looking at what is in your brain and taking it out into the real world" just like a gun isn't a "defensive tool". You can only ask to get a thing, a random,fake thing. You can only shoot people. You don't even have to imagine something, it's a tool doing it's wonky, useless to anything but harm, work.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • kreatorfangirls@metalhead.clubK kreatorfangirls@metalhead.club

                                    @FrutigerAero00 @CiaraNi The bird's head is convex when seen from the outside.

                                    But what's in that image still doesn't match anything from the fluid mechanics I learned in school.

                                    frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    frutigeraero00@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #99

                                    @kreatorfangirls @CiaraNi 😂 Correct! My native language is not english and i confuse terms 😂😂 well the thing is, we should properly link and source images so these doubty things wether ai or not would be clearer

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                      People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                                      shadowdancer@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      shadowdancer@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      shadowdancer@mstdn.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #100

                                      @CiaraNi
                                      Divide & conquer. A classic and an all time favourite of faschists and tyrants.

                                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                        People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                                        chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.science
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #101

                                        @CiaraNi #AI is #clankers 🤖 all the way down, which is why #wankers love 💕 it *so much*.

                                        #Resist #AIslop.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • capnthommo@c.imC capnthommo@c.im

                                          @weirdmustard @CiaraNi it's certainly making me question every image I see of a species new to me. Not only birds.

                                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ciarani@mastodon.green
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #102

                                          @capnthommo @weirdmustard Such a depressing situation we find ourselves in

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups