In my experience, people who care about accessibility are usually good folks.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@AltTextHealthCheck/116043212772197701
In my experience, people who care about accessibility are usually good folks. So if you’re looking for a good Mastodon instance to join, this is likely a good guide.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@AltTextHealthCheck/116043212772197701
In my experience, people who care about accessibility are usually good folks. So if you’re looking for a good Mastodon instance to join, this is likely a good guide.
@aral Unexpected meaning: you’re bad, Aram
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@AltTextHealthCheck/116043212772197701
In my experience, people who care about accessibility are usually good folks. So if you’re looking for a good Mastodon instance to join, this is likely a good guide.
@aral Just wondering: if a server "filters" that instance, would it still be included with the data this graphic is based upon? Just want to understand how "complete" the base is there (i.e. if it means an instance not listed there must have a "worse rating" – or that it just wasn't taken into consideration).
Ah, and I see "smaller instances" like yours are not considered for the graph at all either. So one should keep that in mind when using this as a guide
But good in general! -
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
