For all the Proton fans
-
For all the Proton fans
Without following their countries laws …?
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte Anyone who thinks Proton, Tuta or any other company is going to disobey a court order to protect a user is delusional. Proton states upfront that for absolute anonymity, use a free account (or pay with cash or whatever) and only connect using their onion site. They've never given up the content of emails (cause its encrypted in such a way that they can't access). They've never given any log info for VPN use (cause they have a strict no logs policy). Its as simple as that.
-
@serebit @skinnylatte what got him was paying for his “anonymous” account with his Platinum Visa like a normie buying socks on Amazon.
Proton handed over the payment identifier, Swiss authorities passed it to the FBI, and suddenly your anonymity has a name on it.
if you’re not paying with Monero or cash, you don’t have an anonymous email. you have encrypted email with a billing address. those are very different things.
This really should be front and centre of the discussion. They complied with a valid Swiss court order, as stated on their ToS.
The account holders opsec is the issue if they required full anonymity (possible? Another discussion).
This whole thing is the same as the statement "Your VPN provider won't go to jail for your $5".
If they were served with an administrative warrant from an out of jurisdiction LEA and complied, then WAY more to be upset over.
-
@kDelta @WakinUniverseJo @skinnylatte Forwarding is free, hosting/sending isn't. It's only $3 a month though.
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte This...seems perfectly normal? Like, what was Proton's alternative here?
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte Whats the problem? Court order said give the info, they gave the info. They're not a pirate email provider operating in international waters in a submarine disguised as a whale.... they're a business who focuses on privacy.
-
This really should be front and centre of the discussion. They complied with a valid Swiss court order, as stated on their ToS.
The account holders opsec is the issue if they required full anonymity (possible? Another discussion).
This whole thing is the same as the statement "Your VPN provider won't go to jail for your $5".
If they were served with an administrative warrant from an out of jurisdiction LEA and complied, then WAY more to be upset over.
@chroma0 @k3ym0 @serebit @skinnylatte exactly, why is it so hard for people to undertsnd this? guess from a US lens they look at it, oh my local cop without even a magistrate warrent got everything from the us corp, so court orders in another county holds the same weight as that email the cop sent through.
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte goddammit!
-
@r3dr3clus3 @skinnylatte If you don't have the data, you can be ordered to give it up by whomever, and you can't. Proton mail claims privacy, but it in fact saves enough data to identify a single individual.
The headline is not biased. Proton claims things they actually can't uphold. This is not the fault of the customer. Stop blaming the victim.
@Pyrogenesis "The headline is not biased" - so I'll ask again: Did Proton help the FBI? Or did Proton comply with a Swiss Court Order, and the Swiss government helped the FBI?
A more unbiased headline might be, "Proton turns over user payment information because of Swiss Court Order".
I'm not blaming a victim. I'm demanding better activism. We live in a world where organized activism is becoming more and more crucial, and it's the responsibility of activists, especially those organizing activism, to understand the capabilities and limitations of their communications networks.
I'm not blaming anyone. I'm saying I want people to realize that it doesn't matter if this was Proton, or Tuta, or some other "private" service, and realize that they are all beholden to legal systems that determine the minimal amount of data that must be collected, the length of time it has to be retained, and how personally identifiable that information is.
So if I'm "blaming the victim" by saying, "There is a valuable lesson to be learned here, and it's not just dunking on Proton" then sure, that's what I'm doing and I stand by it.
EDIT
For anyone going, "tHiS iS wHy I uSe TuTa!", here's a link to a page with a big red banner that Tuta rejected 75% of all court orders in 2025. Which is very cool, don't get me wrong - that's super cool - but what are those other 25%?
https://tuta.com/blog/transparency-reportAm I more into Tuta than Proton at this point? Yep. Do I think Proton was really the issue this time? Nope.
Stay sharp.
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte Their AI bs made me leave. Moved over to Tuta.
-
@skinnylatte Their AI bs made me leave. Moved over to Tuta.
@thestrangelet yeah this is my actual problem with them. No company is gonna refuse a court order from the government they operate under. I’m a paid proton account girl rn but I’m maintaining my tutamail and may switch due to the genAI pushing in proton.
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte they also did that to a climate fan. I've long said like Telegram is not so private as people think - use systems like cyberfear (and their related email system).
-
For all the Proton fans
@skinnylatte @protonprivacy ¿Explanation?
-
@skinnylatte This headline is incredibly biased. Did Proton help the FBI? Or did they hand over data to the Swiss government that the Swiss government ordered them to, and then the Swiss helped the FBI unmask an anonymous protester?
I keep seeing this post pop up in my feed with permutations of "WHY PROTON DO THIS!?" -- Because they were legally ordered to.
We're doing a disservice to ourselves for not recognizing the bounds of the privacy that Proton, or Tuta, or any other "private" email service provides, and looking at this moment as a failure by the provider - when really it's the failure of a user to recognize the technical & legal bounds of of their comms services to keep them anonymous.
The lesson here, i think, is about opsec, and knowing the bounds of the tools we're employing for whatever our goals are.
Would be good to know if they were legally compelled to turn over the (billing?) data …
-
@skinnylatte Whats the problem? Court order said give the info, they gave the info. They're not a pirate email provider operating in international waters in a submarine disguised as a whale.... they're a business who focuses on privacy.
sorta pearl clutching. tell me one business anywhare besides a swiss bank perhpas thats gonna NOT comply with the law
-
@skinnylatte Anyone who thinks Proton, Tuta or any other company is going to disobey a court order to protect a user is delusional. Proton states upfront that for absolute anonymity, use a free account (or pay with cash or whatever) and only connect using their onion site. They've never given up the content of emails (cause its encrypted in such a way that they can't access). They've never given any log info for VPN use (cause they have a strict no logs policy). Its as simple as that.
my account is free
-
@yc99.bsky.social Tuta isn’t even as good as Proton
-
If they can't structure their service in a way that avoids the collection and storage of personally identifiable customer data, then they have no business claiming they offer privacy. This is like charging a premium for the world’s most secure door lock when a burglar can easily enter your house by breaking a window.
@freediverx @taylor @boojum @skinnylatte
Privacy is not anonymity.
Encryption allows the details of a message only be read by sender and receiver. That’s privacy. Email otherwise is inherently insecure and not private. Your email address and the subject are plain text in transit.It’s not who you are, it’s what you say that is protected.
Keeping financial records may very well be part of Swiss law. I know they have to keep financials for 10 years.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
