Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris.

Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
119 Posts 45 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tagyourtoe@mastodon.socialT tagyourtoe@mastodon.social

    @JackMexa4 Guess what.

    J This user is from outside of this forum
    J This user is from outside of this forum
    jackmexa4@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #91

    @TagYourToe

    Oh, I know.

    Precisely, let’s call a spade a spade.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #92

      @nando161 @mls14 @knowprose @Enea90 @randahl

      nobody cares nando

      justify your impotence to yourself

      we see what you are

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • oneiros@ruhr.socialO oneiros@ruhr.social

        @rayocentric
        Putin is a tool of which bank?
        @randahl

        rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rayocentric@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #93

        @oneiros @randahl
        Hi. One doesn't need to know the species of every tree to recognize the forest. The game is the game.

        At any rate, I didn't mention him, but the country he oversees has a central bank.

        Please feel free to fact check me.

        oneiros@ruhr.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

          Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris. She would have continued the Ukraine weapons support, she would have kept the strong alliances with Europe, and she would never have killed the Iran nuclear deal.

          Together we could have forced Putin out of Ukraine, there would have been no new, wider war in The Middle East, and the NATO alliance would have been stronger than ever. And in that situation, I think our economies would have been considerably stronger too.

          Populism derailed all that.

          numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
          numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
          numodular@c.im
          wrote last edited by
          #94

          @randahl Au Contraire; failing educational systems are at root.

          Make #BehavioralScience #CoreEducation or #BackIntoCaves

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • veza85ue@eupolicy.socialV veza85ue@eupolicy.social

            @randahl I... whut? Who was President in 2014? (Doubly applicable for both Ukraine and Syria.)
            Which President did Denmark wiretap its EU neighbours for?
            Which President limited the weapons range and aid for Ukraine?
            Who is Jake Sullivan?
            Who is Ben Rhodes?

            etc. etc.

            oneiros@ruhr.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            oneiros@ruhr.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            oneiros@ruhr.social
            wrote last edited by
            #95

            @Veza85UE
            The other candidate promised to burn the world, end health care, deport all immigrants, end the republic, and was a senile idiot.
            "But her emails!".
            @randahl

            veza85ue@eupolicy.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

              Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris. She would have continued the Ukraine weapons support, she would have kept the strong alliances with Europe, and she would never have killed the Iran nuclear deal.

              Together we could have forced Putin out of Ukraine, there would have been no new, wider war in The Middle East, and the NATO alliance would have been stronger than ever. And in that situation, I think our economies would have been considerably stronger too.

              Populism derailed all that.

              whinery@undefined.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              whinery@undefined.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              whinery@undefined.social
              wrote last edited by
              #96

              @randahl

              On a side note: #Trump pulled out of #Iran #NuclearDeal in 2018. The deal was already killed before the 2024 president campaign.So, if US voters had picked #Herris she would have to renegotiate the deal again.

              #Iran #nucleardeal

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tagyourtoe@mastodon.socialT tagyourtoe@mastodon.social

                @rayocentric @randahl

                Link Preview Image
                rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rayocentric@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #97

                @TagYourToe Not quite. Hope you're sitting down for this. Sometimes... individuals... even melanated ones... think for themselves and don't hive mind.

                tagyourtoe@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • rayocentric@mastodon.socialR rayocentric@mastodon.social

                  @oneiros @randahl
                  Hi. One doesn't need to know the species of every tree to recognize the forest. The game is the game.

                  At any rate, I didn't mention him, but the country he oversees has a central bank.

                  Please feel free to fact check me.

                  oneiros@ruhr.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oneiros@ruhr.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oneiros@ruhr.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #98

                  @rayocentric
                  With Harris Warren, Sanders, and AOC would have been listened to. Now we have an oligarch in the WH.
                  @randahl

                  rayocentric@mastodon.socialR 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • projektionsyta@mastodon.nuP This user is from outside of this forum
                    projektionsyta@mastodon.nuP This user is from outside of this forum
                    projektionsyta@mastodon.nu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #99

                    @nando161

                    Céline was a fascist, impressing fools with his rhetorical gift.

                    @benroyce @knowprose @Enea90 @randahl

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

                      Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris. She would have continued the Ukraine weapons support, she would have kept the strong alliances with Europe, and she would never have killed the Iran nuclear deal.

                      Together we could have forced Putin out of Ukraine, there would have been no new, wider war in The Middle East, and the NATO alliance would have been stronger than ever. And in that situation, I think our economies would have been considerably stronger too.

                      Populism derailed all that.

                      cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #100

                      @randahl

                      Hmmm. Thinking about this late 2024 article today for no particular reason....

                      Link Preview Image
                      Kamala Harris says Iran is ‘greatest adversary’ of US

                      Democratic presidential candidate says preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is one of her top priorities.

                      favicon

                      Al Jazeera (www.aljazeera.com)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

                        Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris. She would have continued the Ukraine weapons support, she would have kept the strong alliances with Europe, and she would never have killed the Iran nuclear deal.

                        Together we could have forced Putin out of Ukraine, there would have been no new, wider war in The Middle East, and the NATO alliance would have been stronger than ever. And in that situation, I think our economies would have been considerably stronger too.

                        Populism derailed all that.

                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                        wrote last edited by
                        #101

                        @randahl

                        Unfortunately, there is very good evidence that the Democratic Party was willing to lose to totalitarian rule rather than reject an ongoing genocide. She didn’t have what it took to refuse that idea.

                        The worst thing about this is that people who unhappy with the state of affairs will choose whatever options are laying around.

                        The only option a lot of people saw was the Republican Party over the current state of affairs.

                        ..

                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mls14@social.vivaldi.netM mls14@social.vivaldi.net

                          @nando161 @benroyce @knowprose @Enea90 @randahl I see you are quoting somebody here. But you live in Australia, so voting is mandatory, right?

                          Is there a way to opt out of the mandatory voting?

                          tserong@wirejunkie.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tserong@wirejunkie.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tserong@wirejunkie.net
                          wrote last edited by
                          #102

                          @mls14 once you're on the electoral roll in Australia, you'll potentially be fined if you don't show up and vote in an election. But there's no penalties if you never enroll to vote in the first place...

                          One thing that's often missed in discussions of compulsory voting is that if the state requires everyone to vote then the state must also make it _possible_ and _easy_ for _everyone_ to vote. It's the ultimate in enfranchisement if you look at it from that perspective.

                          If you're on the electoral roll and you really can't find anyone you're prepared to vote for, for whatever reason, and you don't want to pay the fine, you can always submit a blank ballot.

                          @nando161 @benroyce @knowprose @Enea90 @randahl

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                            @randahl

                            Unfortunately, there is very good evidence that the Democratic Party was willing to lose to totalitarian rule rather than reject an ongoing genocide. She didn’t have what it took to refuse that idea.

                            The worst thing about this is that people who unhappy with the state of affairs will choose whatever options are laying around.

                            The only option a lot of people saw was the Republican Party over the current state of affairs.

                            ..

                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                            wrote last edited by
                            #103

                            @randahl

                            This is the real lesson for all of us. We have to have a political system that’s capable of offering choices that aren’t affordability crisis versus fascism.

                            Our political system is that dysfunctional and we need a different system to offer us more choices. The very basic that would be ranked choice and proportional representation and probably massively expanding the House of Representatives.

                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • oneiros@ruhr.socialO oneiros@ruhr.social

                              @Veza85UE
                              The other candidate promised to burn the world, end health care, deport all immigrants, end the republic, and was a senile idiot.
                              "But her emails!".
                              @randahl

                              veza85ue@eupolicy.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              veza85ue@eupolicy.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              veza85ue@eupolicy.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #104

                              @oneiros @randahl Must make sense if you spend a lot of time consumming Amerislop political content. I can see why EUropeans who like to rubberneck at their shitshow think I'm talking about THEIR politics as opposed to ours in 🇪🇺 (the clue was Syria!). This: "would have kept the strong alliances with Europe" is not my desired outcome; "alliance" is a polite euphemism here... I don't care about *their* healthcare or the quality of their governance, but I don't mentally live in a Big Puerto Rico.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                @randahl

                                This is the real lesson for all of us. We have to have a political system that’s capable of offering choices that aren’t affordability crisis versus fascism.

                                Our political system is that dysfunctional and we need a different system to offer us more choices. The very basic that would be ranked choice and proportional representation and probably massively expanding the House of Representatives.

                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                wrote last edited by
                                #105

                                @randahl

                                Originally a single representative represented 30,000 people and a law passed by Congress capped the size of the House of Representatives so that a portion is now spread over I think 1 million people per politician

                                This has of course, only serve the interest of consolidated power

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • oneiros@ruhr.socialO oneiros@ruhr.social

                                  @rayocentric
                                  With Harris Warren, Sanders, and AOC would have been listened to. Now we have an oligarch in the WH.
                                  @randahl

                                  rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rayocentric@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #106

                                  @oneiros @randahl I hear you, brother... but I'm not so sure. Russia wasn't listening to Harris while she was literally in office. All of her promises were for a future date to be determined as if she wasn't already in a position of power.

                                  Not a Trump fan either, but this dude even has his inlaws talking to people.

                                  My bigger point was that the presidential vote in the U.S. gives the illusion of inclusion because the electoral college, not the mom and pop, pick the president.

                                  oneiros@ruhr.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

                                    Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris. She would have continued the Ukraine weapons support, she would have kept the strong alliances with Europe, and she would never have killed the Iran nuclear deal.

                                    Together we could have forced Putin out of Ukraine, there would have been no new, wider war in The Middle East, and the NATO alliance would have been stronger than ever. And in that situation, I think our economies would have been considerably stronger too.

                                    Populism derailed all that.

                                    jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jpaskaruk@growers.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #107

                                    @randahl Populism Misogynoir

                                    FTFY

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • oneiros@ruhr.socialO oneiros@ruhr.social

                                      @rayocentric
                                      With Harris Warren, Sanders, and AOC would have been listened to. Now we have an oligarch in the WH.
                                      @randahl

                                      rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rayocentric@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rayocentric@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #108

                                      @oneiros @randahl And speaking of Sanders, he won the popular vote against Clinton, but the RNC and DNC pick the candidate, not the popular vote.

                                      Please feel free to fact check me. I'm old. None of this new except the names we insert. The story is very cookie cutter and consistent.

                                      oneiros@ruhr.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

                                        Imagine if US voters had picked Kamala Harris. She would have continued the Ukraine weapons support, she would have kept the strong alliances with Europe, and she would never have killed the Iran nuclear deal.

                                        Together we could have forced Putin out of Ukraine, there would have been no new, wider war in The Middle East, and the NATO alliance would have been stronger than ever. And in that situation, I think our economies would have been considerably stronger too.

                                        Populism derailed all that.

                                        mattmaison@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mattmaison@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mattmaison@mastodon.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #109

                                        @randahl

                                        Also masochism and racism.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rayocentric@mastodon.socialR rayocentric@mastodon.social

                                          @TagYourToe Not quite. Hope you're sitting down for this. Sometimes... individuals... even melanated ones... think for themselves and don't hive mind.

                                          tagyourtoe@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tagyourtoe@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tagyourtoe@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #110

                                          @rayocentric This has nothing to do with you, though.

                                          rayocentric@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups