Did you know you can pass a bill that states 1 + 1 = 3 ?

[david_chisnall@infosec.exchange]

@FrutigerAero00 @tinker

I don't think that's what happened. The UK passed the Online Safety Act and started enforcing it. The OSA requires platforms to do age verification, which they do in a bunch of privacy-hostile ways, and (rightly) blame the government for the fact that they're harvesting even more personal data.

California rushed through a poorly worded law that said that, if doing age verification is required for any purpose then you must use whatever 2-bit value the OS gives you and you may not verify it unless you already hold contradictory data for another purpose (which privacy legislation in California already restricts). And operating systems must have some mechanism for passing the 2-bit value so that 'my OS doesn't provide it' isn't a valid excuse.

Then the rest of the US started trying to pass laws like the UK ones.

[mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social]

@tinker

Please link the statute that says otherwise.

First rule of legality:
Burden of proof is never EVER on the petitioner/victim aka the person making a claim.

You have to disprove me to find your answer and I am absolutely not educating you when you behave like THIS when corrected about literally written law.

[mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social]

Yes. I spent my time in court houses and law libraries. Years of time researching, in mostly paper books, correct.
You repeated my statement & incorrectly assume I "copy pasted" things for your convenience.
Thank you for minimising or invalidating my education.
Didja know there are cyber security courses available for attorneys through Harvard FREE?
Just be pro se. Good luck paying for Lexus Nexus, though, that one's pricey.
"Shepardize" literally stole my intellectual property, but I digress.

[mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social]

@tinker

No, do your own research, because nothing I say is going to change your mind and it's not my job to make you able to represent yourself because you think ignorance to the law refutes culpability of breaking/violating it.

Find a statute that proves I'm wrong, and copy paste it. A SINGLE STATUTE. Instead of asking me for more than 10 in more than four sections of federal law and more than 50 Supreme Court cases.

[mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social]

@tinker

Also YOU made the claim of Utah introducing legislation that's new. YOU bare the burden of proof. Law 101.

[mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social]

@tinker

You introduced the article, I don't come online to debate, you aren't genuinely interested in anything other than debating and arguments (which you've made abundantly clear with your desperation to make this appear as some sort of conflict it never was) and that's gross, so have the day you deserve "whew internet arguement won". Here's your trophy

Okay, you lost your temper BUT you won the arguments that didn't exist. Congratulations. Have a gold star.

Oh & all the medals! ️

[mage_of_chaos@mastodon.social]

@tinker oh hey look it's another legislative movement I helped make sure was going into U.S. history.

Phenominal.

I wish less were over what I went through as a child or victim I guess.

You have a better day, how about that! The Mormons are going to not give a shit about this, at least!
Lmfao.

[tinker@infosec.exchange]

@Mage_of_Chaos - I've had a chance to step back and I need to apologize. I should not have taken such a flippant stance and I need to not use sarcasm as a defense mechanism.

I have a tendency to attract reply guys in my posts - legit trolls that are not engaging sincerely. And I acted out in frustration. That was not good.

I think you have been engaging sincerely and I reacted poorly.

I'm sorry.

I'm going to delete my interactions with you. But I'm going to leave this post up as an indication that I acted poorly. I want to remove the things that hurt without hiding that I hurt you or made your day any worse.

I, sincerely, do hope you have a good day.