Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. If you had to pick _one_, which web platform feature would you like in Firefox that isn't part of the Interop 2026 effort?

If you had to pick _one_, which web platform feature would you like in Firefox that isn't part of the Interop 2026 effort?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
76 Posts 44 Posters 250 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

    @gundersen would you be ok if it was behind a site permission addon? https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/site-permission-add-ons

    atjn@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
    atjn@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
    atjn@mastodon.online
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    @firefoxwebdevs Yes, as long as there is a good way to detect a blocked permission, so you can reask the user or gracefully degrade the experience.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

      If you had to pick _one_, which web platform feature would you like in Firefox that isn't part of the Interop 2026 effort? https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/02/launching-interop-2026/#new-features

      bigandy@indieweb.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigandy@indieweb.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigandy@indieweb.social
      wrote on last edited by
      #68

      @firefoxwebdevs
      inline if() CSS

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

        @ausi just to double check, you mean margin-trim, not text-box-trim?

        ausi@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        ausi@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        ausi@mastodon.social
        wrote on last edited by
        #69

        @firefoxwebdevs yes, margin-trim. Safari supports it and I think Chrome is working on it too IIRC.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

          If you had to pick _one_, which web platform feature would you like in Firefox that isn't part of the Interop 2026 effort? https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/02/launching-interop-2026/#new-features

          atjn@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
          atjn@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
          atjn@mastodon.online
          wrote on last edited by
          #70

          @firefoxwebdevs Missing CSS random() has previously blocked me from porting JS to CSS.

          Link Preview Image
          types: `random()` | Can I use... Support tables for HTML5, CSS3, etc

          "Can I use" provides up-to-date browser support tables for support of front-end web technologies on desktop and mobile web browsers.

          favicon

          (caniuse.com)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

            If you had to pick _one_, which web platform feature would you like in Firefox that isn't part of the Interop 2026 effort? https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/02/launching-interop-2026/#new-features

            atjn@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
            atjn@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
            atjn@mastodon.online
            wrote on last edited by
            #71

            @firefoxwebdevs The new "install app" button in Firefox for Windows is a welcome addition, but makes it hard to provide good user guides, as support is not guaranteed. I hope you are working on expanding support to all platforms.

            An alternate way to make this easier, is to suppprt the install button, which would make guides much simpler and no longer dependent on specific browser knowledge.

            Link Preview Image
            MSEdgeExplainers/WebInstall/explainer-current-doc.md at main · MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers

            Home for explainer documents originated by the Microsoft Edge team - MSEdgeExplainers/WebInstall/explainer-current-doc.md at main · MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers

            favicon

            GitHub (github.com)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

              @krinkle which bits are missing in the latest versions of browsers?

              krinkle@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
              krinkle@fosstodon.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
              krinkle@fosstodon.org
              wrote on last edited by
              #72

              @firefoxwebdevs

              WPT cover a dozen or so missing bits.

              Beyond that, the clearest cut ones are cataloged and polyfilled at https://github.com/w3c/mathml-polyfills. Compare https://w3c.github.io/mathml-polyfills/acid-test.html in two tabs with and without the transform applied.

              For things that are implemented but have known bugs, there is for example a layout bug with mathrm introducing whitespace in Firefox between symbols, where Chrome/Safari/MathJax don't:

              Link Preview Image
              User:Krinkle/MathML Shortlist - MediaWiki

              favicon

              MediaWiki (www.mediawiki.org)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                @gundersen would you be ok if it was behind a site permission addon? https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/site-permission-add-ons

                gundersen@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                gundersen@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                gundersen@mastodon.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #73

                @firefoxwebdevs maybe, but I don't want to normalize instructions to end users about changing browser configs. If people get used to following instructions on website to enable stuff they don't understand then they are more likely to be tricked into enabling something they shouldn't. I'd rather just have a browser ui popup, like webcam and microphone has. Especially I'm thinking of consumer products that need to be set up by the user and could be done using Bluetooth in a website.

                gundersen@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gundersen@mastodon.socialG gundersen@mastodon.social

                  @firefoxwebdevs maybe, but I don't want to normalize instructions to end users about changing browser configs. If people get used to following instructions on website to enable stuff they don't understand then they are more likely to be tricked into enabling something they shouldn't. I'd rather just have a browser ui popup, like webcam and microphone has. Especially I'm thinking of consumer products that need to be set up by the user and could be done using Bluetooth in a website.

                  gundersen@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gundersen@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gundersen@mastodon.social
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #74

                  @firefoxwebdevs currently I have to download an app for every different vendor, which is obviously completely unnecessary. It's just as annoying as every router now requiring an app, rather than just going to 192.168.0.1 and being greeted by a web interface. Why can't I just use my browser to set up connected consumer devices???

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                    If you had to pick _one_, which web platform feature would you like in Firefox that isn't part of the Interop 2026 effort? https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/02/launching-interop-2026/#new-features

                    spartanatreyu@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spartanatreyu@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    spartanatreyu@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #75

                    @firefoxwebdevs Surprised sibling-index and sibling-count weren't commented here already.

                    It's a really big nice-to-have, right up there with text-box-trim.

                    But other things like dialog closedby, cross root aria, making more web component apis declarative, and better selects are musts.

                    firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • spartanatreyu@mastodon.socialS spartanatreyu@mastodon.social

                      @firefoxwebdevs Surprised sibling-index and sibling-count weren't commented here already.

                      It's a really big nice-to-have, right up there with text-box-trim.

                      But other things like dialog closedby, cross root aria, making more web component apis declarative, and better selects are musts.

                      firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #76

                      @spartanatreyu text-box-trim is a personal wish of mine,

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups