Discovering Ageless Linux
-
Discovering Ageless Linux
We are not against child safety. We are against building surveillance infrastructure and calling it child safety.
A law that required applications with genuine risk profiles — social media, messaging, dating apps — to display honest, human-readable safety information at the point of use would be a child safety law. A law that funded digital literacy education in schools would be a child safety law. A law that held platforms accountable for algorithmic amplification of harmful content to minors would be a child safety law.
A law that requires every operating system to collect every user's age and transmit it to every application on demand is not a child safety law. It is an identity infrastructure mandate. The children are the justification. The infrastructure is the product.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic