Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Admin, DevOps, Security
  3. Chat Protocols and Apps
  4. THE CHAT PROTOCOL OF THE FUTURE

THE CHAT PROTOCOL OF THE FUTURE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Chat Protocols and Apps
16 Posts 5 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
    ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    THE CHAT PROTOCOL OF THE FUTURE

    Link Preview Image
    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA tapafon@soc.ua-fediland.deT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

      THE CHAT PROTOCOL OF THE FUTURE

      Link Preview Image
      ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
      ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      like with all things there is a solution: using terraform to manage the channels in the space

      ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

        like with all things there is a solution: using terraform to manage the channels in the space

        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
        ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        the terraform provider creates and owns the channel. it is the only user with the right to turn on encryption for said channels. voila. this is a perfectly reasonable solution.

        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

          the terraform provider creates and owns the channel. it is the only user with the right to turn on encryption for said channels. voila. this is a perfectly reasonable solution.

          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
          ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          matrix E2EE channels are fucking stupid because they leak all sorts of metadata

          for example, the topic is unencrypted

          reactions are unencrypted

          replies reference unencrypted MXIDs so you can tell what is being replied to even if the payload itself is encrypted

          do not use them. do not waste your time on them. it is not worth it.

          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA A 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

            matrix E2EE channels are fucking stupid because they leak all sorts of metadata

            for example, the topic is unencrypted

            reactions are unencrypted

            replies reference unencrypted MXIDs so you can tell what is being replied to even if the payload itself is encrypted

            do not use them. do not waste your time on them. it is not worth it.

            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
            ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            or as I put it in the Bundernet #known-issues room which is acting as an FAQ

            Link Preview Image
            siguza@infosec.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
            • incentiveI incentive moved this topic from Uncategorized
            • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

              or as I put it in the Bundernet #known-issues room which is acting as an FAQ

              Link Preview Image
              siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
              siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
              siguza@infosec.space
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @ariadne Matrix also allows unencrypted messages in encrypted rooms, and the information that a room is encrypted may not reach a client. I reported this to both clients and the matrix spec, but was told that this was expected behaviour both times ("because we want to allow bots"). Dumbest E2E impl out there.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                matrix E2EE channels are fucking stupid because they leak all sorts of metadata

                for example, the topic is unencrypted

                reactions are unencrypted

                replies reference unencrypted MXIDs so you can tell what is being replied to even if the payload itself is encrypted

                do not use them. do not waste your time on them. it is not worth it.

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                alwayscurious@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @ariadne is this something that could be fixed or is it too fundamental to how Matrix works?

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                  THE CHAT PROTOCOL OF THE FUTURE

                  Link Preview Image
                  tapafon@soc.ua-fediland.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tapafon@soc.ua-fediland.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tapafon@soc.ua-fediland.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @ariadne Are there any good, federated and E2EE IMs? Signal has good E2EE but not federation, XMPP has better federation but no E2EE out of the box.
                  IMHO, Matrix is currently the best of what we got, in terms of both decentralisation and privacy.

                  ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tapafon@soc.ua-fediland.deT tapafon@soc.ua-fediland.de

                    @ariadne Are there any good, federated and E2EE IMs? Signal has good E2EE but not federation, XMPP has better federation but no E2EE out of the box.
                    IMHO, Matrix is currently the best of what we got, in terms of both decentralisation and privacy.

                    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @tapafon when it comes to E2EE federation is not a priority for me, safety is the priority.

                    kkarhan@infosec.spaceK 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                      @tapafon when it comes to E2EE federation is not a priority for me, safety is the priority.

                      kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@infosec.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @tapafon @ariadne then I guess the only good option is self-hosted #XMPP+#OMEMO and/or #PGP/MIME!

                      • Anything else is either a controlled opposition, honeypot, or just flatout marketing lies.
                      ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kkarhan@infosec.spaceK kkarhan@infosec.space

                        @tapafon @ariadne then I guess the only good option is self-hosted #XMPP+#OMEMO and/or #PGP/MIME!

                        • Anything else is either a controlled opposition, honeypot, or just flatout marketing lies.
                        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @kkarhan @tapafon XMPP also leaks metadata. E-mail also leaks metadata. secure messaging needs to be built around protocols designed for it.

                        kkarhan@infosec.spaceK 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                          @kkarhan @tapafon XMPP also leaks metadata. E-mail also leaks metadata. secure messaging needs to be built around protocols designed for it.

                          kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kkarhan@infosec.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @tapafon @ariadne The whole "Metadata" discussion is for the most part FUD by Signal fans.

                          • OFC this doesn't mean I deny the problem.

                            • But if you are concerned about said issue then you'd already only communicate with you own private self-hosted servers that are only reachable with a VPN over Tor.

                          The truth is that as of now there are no good options out there, unless you consider sending #PGP-encypted messages to a self-hosted, hidden ntfy.sh server to each other.

                          • I'd love to be wrong on that one, but so far #XMPP+#OMEMO & #PGP/MIME (both over #Tor) is the best practical option if you don't expect people to become unlicensed radio amateurs and illegally moonbounce their encrypted messages with WSJ…
                          ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • kkarhan@infosec.spaceK kkarhan@infosec.space

                            @tapafon @ariadne The whole "Metadata" discussion is for the most part FUD by Signal fans.

                            • OFC this doesn't mean I deny the problem.

                              • But if you are concerned about said issue then you'd already only communicate with you own private self-hosted servers that are only reachable with a VPN over Tor.

                            The truth is that as of now there are no good options out there, unless you consider sending #PGP-encypted messages to a self-hosted, hidden ntfy.sh server to each other.

                            • I'd love to be wrong on that one, but so far #XMPP+#OMEMO & #PGP/MIME (both over #Tor) is the best practical option if you don't expect people to become unlicensed radio amateurs and illegally moonbounce their encrypted messages with WSJ…
                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @kkarhan @tapafon

                            > The whole "Metadata" discussion is for the most part FUD by Signal fans.

                            lmao no it isn't. CIA kills based on metadata.

                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA kkarhan@infosec.spaceK 2 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                              @kkarhan @tapafon

                              > The whole "Metadata" discussion is for the most part FUD by Signal fans.

                              lmao no it isn't. CIA kills based on metadata.

                              ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                              ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                              ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @kkarhan @tapafon

                              the solution to Signal being proprietary is to build a libre clone of Signal, not to pretend that Matrix and XMPP are safe.

                              kkarhan@infosec.spaceK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                                @kkarhan @tapafon

                                > The whole "Metadata" discussion is for the most part FUD by Signal fans.

                                lmao no it isn't. CIA kills based on metadata.

                                kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kkarhan@infosec.space
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @tapafon @ariadne

                                But if you are concerned about said issue then you'd already only communicate with you own private self-hosted servers that are only reachable with a VPN over Tor.

                                Source

                                Again: Layering & Defining your Scope is critical.

                                • If we expect "#TechIlliterate #Nirmies" to "migrate to #Tails & #GrapheneOS or die" they'll give us all the finger and most likely add a restraint order on top of it.

                                  • OFC we need to work on this scope, but I'd rather offer the "best possible" than being complicit in the Starus Quo.

                                Feel free to name alternatives that actually work and have actual support…

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA ariadne@social.treehouse.systems

                                  @kkarhan @tapafon

                                  the solution to Signal being proprietary is to build a libre clone of Signal, not to pretend that Matrix and XMPP are safe.

                                  kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kkarhan@infosec.spaceK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  kkarhan@infosec.space
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @tapafon @ariadne that won't hapoen because #Signal are so fucking criminally incompetent that they are hard locked-in on #aws on their inrastructure.

                                  • It would likely be easier and cheaper in terms of personnel hours needed to just make better, hardened clients for existing protocols rather than "unfuck" the mess that is @signalapp, which at best is just a big-ass #Honeypot!
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups