Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
activitypubactivitystreamsfedidevfediverse
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    reiver@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

    To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.

    That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) — since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.

    I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.

    ...

    It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.

    #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #Fediverse

    haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH trwnh@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
    • reiver@mastodon.socialR reiver@mastodon.social

      With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

      To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.

      That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) — since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.

      I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.

      ...

      It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.

      #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #Fediverse

      haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH This user is from outside of this forum
      haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH This user is from outside of this forum
      haitchfive@oldbytes.space
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @reiver Did you and I discuss queryfy a while ago, or was it one of my other projects?

      Just wondering whether I owe you a heads up since queryfy has been bumped up to v0.3.0

      reiver@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • haitchfive@oldbytes.spaceH haitchfive@oldbytes.space

        @reiver Did you and I discuss queryfy a while ago, or was it one of my other projects?

        Just wondering whether I owe you a heads up since queryfy has been bumped up to v0.3.0

        reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        reiver@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        reiver@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @haitchfive

        I don't think it was me, but — it seems interesting.

        https://github.com/ha1tch/quertfy

        .

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • reiver@mastodon.socialR reiver@mastodon.social

          With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

          To me, it feels like there should have been something that is a common parent of both 'Object' and 'Link'.

          That just had the "name", "nameMap", and "preview" fields (along with "id" and "type, of course) — since that is what 'Object' and 'Link' share in common.

          I'll just call this common parent: 'Entity'.

          ...

          It could have even been an opportunity to talk about how to handle unknown types.

          #ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #Fediverse

          trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          trwnh@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @reiver i think the disjunction between Object and Link was actually unnecessary. https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/666

          i also think there's too much emphasis on types when there really shouldn't be -- it's the *properties* that you end up using almost all of the time. pretty much the only types that actually matter are the Activity types (because you can't infer those).

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups