When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
-
-
-
@avradi This is why Zuckerberg is rich, because people won't make the slightest effort. As for your objections, I haven't had that experience. It was easy to start, I can follow any instance, and there are no bots, no made-up posts designed to test my reactions, and no ads. #Facebook groups has a dozen alternatives, but it might require learning something, so no one explores. You have been sold a bill of goods.
-
@felwert @aral On Mastodon, you can make a post "only for followers," and we're fine with it. I can imagine that a user can decide on his personal level not to share their post with the open web. That's their choice.
(Though, the funny part is that it's more like a flag, and respecting it depends completely on the app, so if there is more traction for Bluesky, apps going around that might start popping up. Same for blocks.)
@Krazov@mstdn.social @felwert@fedihum.org @aral@mastodon.ar.al It can get a little frustrating if you follow only one person in the thread of replies. You only see one side of the conversation.
-
@JoBlakely @avradi @Gustodon This feature is indeed server-based. Admins can enable it if they want to. This is why choosing server is important as they all has own features and stuff.
-
@Krazov@mstdn.social @felwert@fedihum.org @aral@mastodon.ar.al It can get a little frustrating if you follow only one person in the thread of replies. You only see one side of the conversation.
@nowster @felwert @aral Alas, that's unavoidable. And Fedi is sometimes worse; if you happen to be on an instance defederated from some of the discussants, you have those empty spots. What Twitter got nice at some point, was showing placeholders for messages that you cannot see, either due to being blocked, blocking, muting, the message being behind the lock, or simply deleted. At least there was a visual cue.
