theres so much I dont like about this paragraph

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon its basically saying that God’s love for all things comes through the fact that, in truth, the Logos underlies them

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon funny enough, phrased as it is in the book, it gave me temporary psychic damage, but “being worthy of Gods love as being a recipient of His holiness” is basically in every episcopal eucharistic prayer. probably other traditions too but im most familiar with my own

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon “it is not “natural”” is anti-maximian propaganda but im still trying to figure out how i feel about maximus’s thoughts on nature anyway

[georgia@netzsphaere.xyz]

@lizzie @luce-anon I think its natural to become holy and return to God eventually

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon maximus agrees!

[georgia@netzsphaere.xyz]

@lizzie @luce-anon yayyyy

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon admittedly balthasar calls him kinda indian for this

[georgia@netzsphaere.xyz]

@lizzie @luce-anon oh balthasar is back

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon ive gotta finish cosmic liturgy but im squeezing all the time out of my own life

[lizzie@brain.worm.pink]

@georgia @luce-anon i will say, if you remove that specific sentence about it not being right or natural, or add qualifications and say “it would not be right apart from God” it does become a permissible statement from a maximian perspective from what i know