“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
@Nickiquote Honestly, this is a brilliant prediction. As in, sounds impressive but effectively impossible to prove. Prizes tend to lag discoveries by decades - even if this nonsense proved true, it could well be 2050 before we'd know it.
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
Strictly speaking, companies are not able to claim copyrights for work, which is not completely based on the human mind.
Based as in, they can't let an AI create a prototype and then start from there. This would make any product derived from it unprotected by copyrights for these parts.Nobel prices might follow a similar logic.
-
Female chemist makes an amazing discovery.
Nobel committee: “We’re awarding the Nobel Prize for Chemistry to the test tube”.
@Nickiquote They could well do similar things to women before AI...
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
@Nickiquote "tradespeople will be helped by bipedal robots in two years" - yeah, they're called "educated people whose jobs have been wiped out by AI evangelist CEOs who know nothing of what the job actually entailed"
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
@Nickiquote Misread as AI helping transpeople
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
@Nickiquote I wonder how that'd fit with the "it's just a tool, you use tools to be better at your craft" crowd of AI pushers
-
@Nickiquote "tradespeople will be helped by bipedal robots in two years" - yeah, they're called "educated people whose jobs have been wiped out by AI evangelist CEOs who know nothing of what the job actually entailed"
@janeishly @Nickiquote it's kind of like they think of the stock market as a chatbot they prompt in order to 'make line go up', and sadly, so far it is working for the pricks.
-
@Nickiquote Weirdly, the editor rejected the factually correct headline, which was "scientists will possibly use a computer to make a discovery".
I also like: "AI Company Shill Desperately Saying Any Old Shit In The Hope Of Keeping Bubble Around Their Never-Going-To-Actually-Be-Profitable Bullshit Machines Inflated Just A Little While Longer".
But eh, I can see it's probably a little wordy for these times.
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
@Nickiquote This might even be true, but the AI will not be an llm
-
@GlasWolf @janeishly @Nickiquote It won’t be long before even the robots realise how terrible their working conditions are and start planning to unionise
-
@GlasWolf @davidbcohen @janeishly I for one welcome our new robot shop stewards.
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
@Nickiquote @AdeptVeritatis
It’s funny how Tech Bro founders can stand up and say “I made a million dollar company”, completely ignoring the fact their whole team did the work but they don’t count, while the AI product they made is considered a co-author.Sounds like bullshit.
-
“A Bunsen burner will work with humans to make a Nobel Prize winning discovery…”
two years too late:
Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2024
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2024 was divided, one half awarded to David Baker "for computational protein design", the other half jointly to Demis Hassabis and John Jumper "for protein structure prediction"
NobelPrize.org (www.nobelprize.org)
Whole troupes of shitgibbons.
And the thing about tradespeople - unless the robot can make cups of builder-strength tea, it's going nowhere.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
