Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others.

Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
25 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pteryx@dice.campP pteryx@dice.camp

    @pluralistic
    ...This leaves me curious as to whether someone did this to you. >_>;

    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.fr
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @pteryx Daily.

    pteryx@dice.campP P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      @pteryx Daily.

      pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
      pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
      pteryx@dice.camp
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @pluralistic
      Oh geez. Awful that you have to not only go through that, but so *much* of that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        Emailing a stranger a blob of unverified AI output is not a form of dialogue - it's an attempt to coerce a stranger into unpaid labor on your behalf. Strangers are not your "human in the loop" whose expensive time is on offer to painstakingly work through the plausible sentences a chatbot made for you for free.

        8/

        juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @pluralistic

        It's the latest iteration of "Watch this two-hour video, which will counter all your arguments!"

        Flooding the zone with time-wasting bullshit, rather than actual engagement with the discussion.

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
        • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

          @pluralistic

          It's the latest iteration of "Watch this two-hour video, which will counter all your arguments!"

          Flooding the zone with time-wasting bullshit, rather than actual engagement with the discussion.

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @juergen_hubert This is exactly right.

          npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            That is a fatal flaw in the idea that we will increase our productivity by asking chatbots to summarize things we don't understand: by definition, if we don't understand a subject, then we won't be qualified to evaluate the summary, either.

            There simply is no substitute for learning about a subject and coming to understand it well enough to advance the subject, whether by contributing your own additions or by critiquing its flaws.

            10/

            robmckenna@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
            robmckenna@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
            robmckenna@mastodon.ie
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @pluralistic education and art are processes, not merely products. You get educated by engaging in the process not by having outputs to be measured (which you can buy or have a chatbot make).

            If you read the solutions at the end of a maths book and copy them into an answer sheet you haven't learned anything.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              I will stipulate that there might be friend groups out there where pastebombs of AI chat transcripts are welcome, but even if you work in such a milieu, you should *never, ever* assume that a stranger wants to see or hear about your AI "conversations." Tagging a chatbot into a social media conversation with a stranger and typing, "Hey Grok‡, what do you think of that?" is like masturbating in front of a stranger.

              ‡ Ugh

              It's rude. It's an imposition. It's gross.

              3/

              drifa@yiff.lifeD This user is from outside of this forum
              drifa@yiff.lifeD This user is from outside of this forum
              drifa@yiff.life
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @pluralistic … and I am seeing it more and more in professional circles. “I’m starting a conversation!”, I’ve been told. No, you’re imposing on me, an actual expert on certain topics, the obligation of correcting the word salad you had generated and then vomited into the world. You’re then adding the puss-filled cherry to this shit sundae by suggesting that you deserve credit, rather than opprobrium, for this selfish act.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                @pteryx Daily.

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                plantwizard@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @pluralistic @pteryx I'm just dumbfounded people have the nerve to do this to you. Just gobsmacked.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  Image:
                  Cryteria (modified)
                  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

                  CC BY 3.0
                  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

                  eof/

                  kye@tech.lgbtK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kye@tech.lgbtK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kye@tech.lgbt
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @pluralistic Sometimes I'll have an LLM argue me out of making a post I know won't help

                  There's a disconnect in how different people use them that chatbot vendors need to contend with.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others. Perhaps you have a friend who will tolerate you recounting dreams at them (treasure those friends), but you should never, ever *presume* that other people want to hear about your dreams.

                    --

                    If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                    Link Preview Image
                    Pluralistic: No one wants to read your AI slop (02 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                    favicon

                    (pluralistic.net)

                    1/

                    Link Preview Image
                    fitzscott@tty0.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fitzscott@tty0.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fitzscott@tty0.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @pluralistic Spot on: "stochastic word-salad"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      @juergen_hubert This is exactly right.

                      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      npars01@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @pluralistic @juergen_hubert

                      Chatbots & AI are information pollution, funded by the same people polluting the commons; air, land, and water.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Trump and the Energy Industry Are Eager to Power AI With Fossil Fuels

                      At a Pittsburgh summit, the Trump administration, energy executives, and tech barons joined as one to promote AI as the future of fossil fuels.

                      favicon

                      WIRED (www.wired.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      ‘Just an unbelievable amount of pollution’: how big a threat is AI to the climate?

                      Defenders say AI can do good to fight the climate crisis. But spiralling energy and water costs leave experts worried

                      favicon

                      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Southern California air board rejected pollution rules after flood of comments from AI-powered platform

                      SoCal’s pollution authority scrapped a plan to phase out gas-powered appliances after receiving more than 20,000 emails sent by an AI-powered platform called CiviClick.

                      favicon

                      Los Angeles Times (www.latimes.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Trump unveils $70bn AI and energy plan at summit with oil and tech bigwigs

                      Pittsburgh event angers climate groups as Trump ties AI expansion to oil and gas, sidelining renewable energy

                      favicon

                      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                      forbes.com

                      favicon

                      (www.forbes.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      AI turns the firehose into a funnel

                      "Flooding the zone is no longer an effective media strategy."

                      favicon

                      Nieman Lab (www.niemanlab.org)

                      Just a moment...

                      favicon

                      (michiganadvance.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      AI’s growing thirst for water is becoming a public health risk

                      AI’s rapid expansion is placing growing pressure on water supplies and public health.

                      favicon

                      Al Jazeera (www.aljazeera.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Advocates raise alarm over Pfas pollution from datacenters amid AI boom

                      Tech companies’ use of Pfas gas at facilities may mean datacenters’ climate impact is worse than previously thought

                      favicon

                      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      'The Precedent Is Flint': How Oregon's Data Center Boom Is Supercharging a Water Crisis

                      Amazon data centers constructed in eastern Oregon's farmland have worsened a water pollution problem that’s been linked to cancer and miscarriages.

                      favicon

                      Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      'I can't drink the water' - life next to a US data centre

                      Residents in rural Georgia say the data centre next door has disrupted their water supply.

                      favicon

                      (www.bbc.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Contaminated: The Carpet Industry’s Toxic Legacy | FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site | Documentary Series

                      How did PFAS chemicals once used in popular stain-resistant carpets end up in the water and environment in parts of Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina?

                      favicon

                      FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site | Documentary Series (www.pbs.org)

                      Link Preview Image
                      A crisis emerges across the US as ‘forever chemicals’ quietly contaminate drinking water wells

                      The roughly 40 million Americans who get drinking water from wells are at particular risk when harmful forever chemicals contaminate the supply.

                      favicon

                      AP News (apnews.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      PFAS found in most americans linked to rapid biological aging

                      “Forever chemicals” known as PFAS have quietly infiltrated everything from nonstick pans to food packaging—and now new research suggests some of them may be speeding up the aging process itself. In a nationally representative U.S. study, two lesser-known PFAS compounds, PFNA and PFOSA, were found in 95% of participants and strongly linked to faster biological aging in men aged 50 to 64.

                      favicon

                      ScienceDaily (www.sciencedaily.com)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others. Perhaps you have a friend who will tolerate you recounting dreams at them (treasure those friends), but you should never, ever *presume* that other people want to hear about your dreams.

                        --

                        If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                        Link Preview Image
                        Pluralistic: No one wants to read your AI slop (02 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                        favicon

                        (pluralistic.net)

                        1/

                        Link Preview Image
                        billyjoebowers@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                        billyjoebowers@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                        billyjoebowers@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @pluralistic

                        Today I learned there are people who will send other people transcripts of AI chatbots and I could never have imagined such a thing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups