Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others.

Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
25 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    Remember: even the AI companies will tell you that the work of overseeing an AI's output is valuable labor. The fact that you can costlessly (to you) generate infinite volumes of verbose, plausible-seeming topical sentences in no way implies that the people who actually think about things and then write them down have the time to mark your chatbot's homework.

    9/

    dss@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    dss@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    dss@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @pluralistic Well said.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      Emailing a stranger a blob of unverified AI output is not a form of dialogue - it's an attempt to coerce a stranger into unpaid labor on your behalf. Strangers are not your "human in the loop" whose expensive time is on offer to painstakingly work through the plausible sentences a chatbot made for you for free.

      8/

      pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
      pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
      pteryx@dice.camp
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @pluralistic
      ...This leaves me curious as to whether someone did this to you. >_>;

      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pteryx@dice.campP pteryx@dice.camp

        @pluralistic
        ...This leaves me curious as to whether someone did this to you. >_>;

        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.fr
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @pteryx Daily.

        pteryx@dice.campP P 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          @pteryx Daily.

          pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
          pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
          pteryx@dice.camp
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @pluralistic
          Oh geez. Awful that you have to not only go through that, but so *much* of that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            Emailing a stranger a blob of unverified AI output is not a form of dialogue - it's an attempt to coerce a stranger into unpaid labor on your behalf. Strangers are not your "human in the loop" whose expensive time is on offer to painstakingly work through the plausible sentences a chatbot made for you for free.

            8/

            juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            juergen_hubert@mementomori.social
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @pluralistic

            It's the latest iteration of "Watch this two-hour video, which will counter all your arguments!"

            Flooding the zone with time-wasting bullshit, rather than actual engagement with the discussion.

            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
            • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialJ juergen_hubert@mementomori.social

              @pluralistic

              It's the latest iteration of "Watch this two-hour video, which will counter all your arguments!"

              Flooding the zone with time-wasting bullshit, rather than actual engagement with the discussion.

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @juergen_hubert This is exactly right.

              npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                That is a fatal flaw in the idea that we will increase our productivity by asking chatbots to summarize things we don't understand: by definition, if we don't understand a subject, then we won't be qualified to evaluate the summary, either.

                There simply is no substitute for learning about a subject and coming to understand it well enough to advance the subject, whether by contributing your own additions or by critiquing its flaws.

                10/

                robmckenna@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                robmckenna@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                robmckenna@mastodon.ie
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @pluralistic education and art are processes, not merely products. You get educated by engaging in the process not by having outputs to be measured (which you can buy or have a chatbot make).

                If you read the solutions at the end of a maths book and copy them into an answer sheet you haven't learned anything.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  I will stipulate that there might be friend groups out there where pastebombs of AI chat transcripts are welcome, but even if you work in such a milieu, you should *never, ever* assume that a stranger wants to see or hear about your AI "conversations." Tagging a chatbot into a social media conversation with a stranger and typing, "Hey Grok‡, what do you think of that?" is like masturbating in front of a stranger.

                  ‡ Ugh

                  It's rude. It's an imposition. It's gross.

                  3/

                  drifa@yiff.lifeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  drifa@yiff.lifeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  drifa@yiff.life
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @pluralistic … and I am seeing it more and more in professional circles. “I’m starting a conversation!”, I’ve been told. No, you’re imposing on me, an actual expert on certain topics, the obligation of correcting the word salad you had generated and then vomited into the world. You’re then adding the puss-filled cherry to this shit sundae by suggesting that you deserve credit, rather than opprobrium, for this selfish act.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    @pteryx Daily.

                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    plantwizard@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @pluralistic @pteryx I'm just dumbfounded people have the nerve to do this to you. Just gobsmacked.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      Image:
                      Cryteria (modified)
                      https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

                      CC BY 3.0
                      https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

                      eof/

                      kye@tech.lgbtK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kye@tech.lgbtK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kye@tech.lgbt
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @pluralistic Sometimes I'll have an LLM argue me out of making a post I know won't help

                      There's a disconnect in how different people use them that chatbot vendors need to contend with.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others. Perhaps you have a friend who will tolerate you recounting dreams at them (treasure those friends), but you should never, ever *presume* that other people want to hear about your dreams.

                        --

                        If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                        Link Preview Image
                        Pluralistic: No one wants to read your AI slop (02 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                        favicon

                        (pluralistic.net)

                        1/

                        Link Preview Image
                        fitzscott@tty0.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fitzscott@tty0.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fitzscott@tty0.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @pluralistic Spot on: "stochastic word-salad"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                          @juergen_hubert This is exactly right.

                          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          npars01@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @pluralistic @juergen_hubert

                          Chatbots & AI are information pollution, funded by the same people polluting the commons; air, land, and water.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Trump and the Energy Industry Are Eager to Power AI With Fossil Fuels

                          At a Pittsburgh summit, the Trump administration, energy executives, and tech barons joined as one to promote AI as the future of fossil fuels.

                          favicon

                          WIRED (www.wired.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          ‘Just an unbelievable amount of pollution’: how big a threat is AI to the climate?

                          Defenders say AI can do good to fight the climate crisis. But spiralling energy and water costs leave experts worried

                          favicon

                          the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Southern California air board rejected pollution rules after flood of comments from AI-powered platform

                          SoCal’s pollution authority scrapped a plan to phase out gas-powered appliances after receiving more than 20,000 emails sent by an AI-powered platform called CiviClick.

                          favicon

                          Los Angeles Times (www.latimes.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Trump unveils $70bn AI and energy plan at summit with oil and tech bigwigs

                          Pittsburgh event angers climate groups as Trump ties AI expansion to oil and gas, sidelining renewable energy

                          favicon

                          the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                          forbes.com

                          favicon

                          (www.forbes.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          AI turns the firehose into a funnel

                          "Flooding the zone is no longer an effective media strategy."

                          favicon

                          Nieman Lab (www.niemanlab.org)

                          Just a moment...

                          favicon

                          (michiganadvance.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          AI’s growing thirst for water is becoming a public health risk

                          AI’s rapid expansion is placing growing pressure on water supplies and public health.

                          favicon

                          Al Jazeera (www.aljazeera.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Advocates raise alarm over Pfas pollution from datacenters amid AI boom

                          Tech companies’ use of Pfas gas at facilities may mean datacenters’ climate impact is worse than previously thought

                          favicon

                          the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          'The Precedent Is Flint': How Oregon's Data Center Boom Is Supercharging a Water Crisis

                          Amazon data centers constructed in eastern Oregon's farmland have worsened a water pollution problem that’s been linked to cancer and miscarriages.

                          favicon

                          Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          'I can't drink the water' - life next to a US data centre

                          Residents in rural Georgia say the data centre next door has disrupted their water supply.

                          favicon

                          (www.bbc.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Contaminated: The Carpet Industry’s Toxic Legacy | FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site | Documentary Series

                          How did PFAS chemicals once used in popular stain-resistant carpets end up in the water and environment in parts of Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina?

                          favicon

                          FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site | Documentary Series (www.pbs.org)

                          Link Preview Image
                          A crisis emerges across the US as ‘forever chemicals’ quietly contaminate drinking water wells

                          The roughly 40 million Americans who get drinking water from wells are at particular risk when harmful forever chemicals contaminate the supply.

                          favicon

                          AP News (apnews.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          PFAS found in most americans linked to rapid biological aging

                          “Forever chemicals” known as PFAS have quietly infiltrated everything from nonstick pans to food packaging—and now new research suggests some of them may be speeding up the aging process itself. In a nationally representative U.S. study, two lesser-known PFAS compounds, PFNA and PFOSA, were found in 95% of participants and strongly linked to faster biological aging in men aged 50 to 64.

                          favicon

                          ScienceDaily (www.sciencedaily.com)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            Everyone knows (or should that as fascinating as your dreams are to *you*, they're eye-glazingly dull to others. Perhaps you have a friend who will tolerate you recounting dreams at them (treasure those friends), but you should never, ever *presume* that other people want to hear about your dreams.

                            --

                            If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

                            Link Preview Image
                            Pluralistic: No one wants to read your AI slop (02 Mar 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                            favicon

                            (pluralistic.net)

                            1/

                            Link Preview Image
                            billyjoebowers@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                            billyjoebowers@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                            billyjoebowers@mastodon.online
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @pluralistic

                            Today I learned there are people who will send other people transcripts of AI chatbots and I could never have imagined such a thing.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups