Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The privacy community is made of individuals and organizations that sometimes hold quite different views.

The privacy community is made of individuals and organizations that sometimes hold quite different views.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
privacyguidesactivismprivacyactivistprivacy
4 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
    privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
    privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    The privacy community is made of individuals and organizations that sometimes hold quite different views. When these divergences lead to infighting, we have to ask how these internal wars impact our community negatively.

    🤝 Learn more on how you can start alliances instead of wars.

    🧰 Check our Privacy Activist Toolbox tip to Start Alliances, Not Wars: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/activism/toolbox/tip-start-alliances-not-wars/

    #PrivacyGuides #Activism #PrivacyActivistToolbox #Privacy

    pip@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

      The privacy community is made of individuals and organizations that sometimes hold quite different views. When these divergences lead to infighting, we have to ask how these internal wars impact our community negatively.

      🤝 Learn more on how you can start alliances instead of wars.

      🧰 Check our Privacy Activist Toolbox tip to Start Alliances, Not Wars: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/activism/toolbox/tip-start-alliances-not-wars/

      #PrivacyGuides #Activism #PrivacyActivistToolbox #Privacy

      pip@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
      pip@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
      pip@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @privacyguides I'm not really sure how to read this argument. We need to work together, yes. And need to be willing to form coalitions with people whom we do not agree with on everything.

      But don't ask me to work with people who do not share my core values. If the disagreement is over, for instance, whether fascism is ok. Or, whether AI is acceptable to use sometimes, this is a un-bridgeable disagreement.

      "Can't we all just get along?"

      No.

      jonah@mastodon.neat.computerJ em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      • pip@infosec.exchangeP pip@infosec.exchange

        @privacyguides I'm not really sure how to read this argument. We need to work together, yes. And need to be willing to form coalitions with people whom we do not agree with on everything.

        But don't ask me to work with people who do not share my core values. If the disagreement is over, for instance, whether fascism is ok. Or, whether AI is acceptable to use sometimes, this is a un-bridgeable disagreement.

        "Can't we all just get along?"

        No.

        jonah@mastodon.neat.computerJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonah@mastodon.neat.computerJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonah@mastodon.neat.computer
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @pip @privacyguides I’ll think about how we can clarify this a bit.

        I can tell you that the main point is that we should get along with people with differences in opinion *on privacy* (or the best way to be private, etc). For one example, we often see privacy-focused companies take down their competitors in this space, instead of “punching up” (collectively) towards Big Tech.

        With incompatible people for reasons unrelated to this singular core value of privacy, not so much 🤷‍♂️

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pip@infosec.exchangeP pip@infosec.exchange

          @privacyguides I'm not really sure how to read this argument. We need to work together, yes. And need to be willing to form coalitions with people whom we do not agree with on everything.

          But don't ask me to work with people who do not share my core values. If the disagreement is over, for instance, whether fascism is ok. Or, whether AI is acceptable to use sometimes, this is a un-bridgeable disagreement.

          "Can't we all just get along?"

          No.

          em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @pip @privacyguides Of course, and this tip makes this clear from the very first paragraph. This is about creating alliances with allies, that are sharing our core values.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups