Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A bill for the people?

A bill for the people?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
surveillanceaccprivacyuspolsurveillanceusgov
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
    privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
    privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

    The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

    Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

    The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

    Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

    #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

    grayhaven@ni.hil.istG burtman@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

      A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

      The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

      Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

      The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

      Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

      #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

      grayhaven@ni.hil.istG This user is from outside of this forum
      grayhaven@ni.hil.istG This user is from outside of this forum
      grayhaven@ni.hil.ist
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @privacyguides Introduced by two Republicans? The only way you can help is to give them money, according to their "Support" page? Yeah, I'm pressing X to doubt on this one.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

        A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

        The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

        Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

        The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

        Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

        #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

        burtman@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        burtman@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        burtman@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @privacyguides This sounds great. Of course, I haven't read it, so it might just be the usual bullshit. They are politicians, after all. But I'd like to thik it isn't just another trojan horse to extend protection for Monsanto or Pfizer or Bill Gates.

        privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • burtman@mastodon.socialB burtman@mastodon.social

          @privacyguides This sounds great. Of course, I haven't read it, so it might just be the usual bullshit. They are politicians, after all. But I'd like to thik it isn't just another trojan horse to extend protection for Monsanto or Pfizer or Bill Gates.

          privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
          privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
          privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @burtman if you do read it, it is in fact great. Very short. So great that it does make me wonder how unlikely it is to be passed, but more awareness of it might help.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups