There are people who seem to believe that the way one identifies as anarchist is to always automatically take the opposite opinion to what the State claiming to own them holds and then the one who does that the most loudly wins anarchism

[b9ace@todon.eu]

There are people who seem to believe that the way one identifies as anarchist is to always automatically take the opposite opinion to what the State claiming to own them holds and then the one who does that the most loudly wins anarchism.
That's not anarchism.
Doing that still leaves those people being ruled by that State, as they base their claimed opinions then not on their own analysis but just on what a State decrees.
That's not quite the opposite of anarchism, but some bizarro variant of opposite of anarchism.

To through own analysis, preferably with friends, reach one's own analysis, not based on what any claimed authority imposes, but maybe inspired by what any potential like-minded may have expressed, is kinda logically inherently required for an anarchism to be an anarchism.

Also, never mind the bollocks. Spending time and effort on posing is a waste, distraction, internally antagonizing, and counterproductive. Anarchism isn't a competition. We all win, together, or none.