Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. AI Controls (formerly 'kill switch') are landing in today's Firefox Nightly, and will land with Firefox 148 later this month.

AI Controls (formerly 'kill switch') are landing in today's Firefox Nightly, and will land with Firefox 148 later this month.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
440 Posts 159 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bicycle@gruene.socialB bicycle@gruene.social

    @firefoxwebdevs
    Where can you find the different definitions for opt-in?
    I only know one.

    @alextecplayz

    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidgerard@circumstances.run
    wrote last edited by
    #408

    @bicycle @firefoxwebdevs @alextecplayz he asked his fellow marketers

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

      @alextecplayz here's the help page, so you can judge for yourself https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-ai-controls. We mostly refrain from using the term "opt-in" because people have different definitions of opt-in.

      Models don't download until you engage with the feature, but some folks have said it's only opt-in if even the entry points are in a separate binary.

      I asked for UI that shows downloaded models, but there wasn't time for that in 148. I'll keep asking for it πŸ˜€

      aaribaud@piaille.frA This user is from outside of this forum
      aaribaud@piaille.frA This user is from outside of this forum
      aaribaud@piaille.fr
      wrote last edited by
      #409

      @firefoxwebdevs @alextecplayz The only way people can have different definitions of "opt in" is if some people deliberately misread "opt in" because they do not want to read what's there, and which is that unless and until the user *opts* to be "*in", they must be left *out*.

      And the only reason why someone might want to misread "opt in" is if they want to get users "in" without said users' opting so.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

        @alextecplayz here's the help page, so you can judge for yourself https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-ai-controls. We mostly refrain from using the term "opt-in" because people have different definitions of opt-in.

        Models don't download until you engage with the feature, but some folks have said it's only opt-in if even the entry points are in a separate binary.

        I asked for UI that shows downloaded models, but there wasn't time for that in 148. I'll keep asking for it πŸ˜€

        kir@mastodon.unoK This user is from outside of this forum
        kir@mastodon.unoK This user is from outside of this forum
        kir@mastodon.uno
        wrote last edited by
        #410

        @firefoxwebdevs @alextecplayz

        You must think we are all fucking stupid, aren't you?

        I can understand a business decision in which I disagree with, but I don like to be talked like a child.
        This is extremely disrespectful and I will never put my trust in your softwares from now on.

        Shame on you

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

          AI Controls (formerly 'kill switch') are landing in today's Firefox Nightly, and will land with Firefox 148 later this month.

          For the full details, see the Firefox blog https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-controls/

          faskil@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          faskil@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          faskil@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #411

          @firefoxwebdevs Still not coming back. πŸ‘‹

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

            AI Controls (formerly 'kill switch') are landing in today's Firefox Nightly, and will land with Firefox 148 later this month.

            For the full details, see the Firefox blog https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-controls/

            bjn@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bjn@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bjn@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #412

            @firefoxwebdevs Thanks for giving me the kick I needed to start my next coding endeavour. I’ve checked out the Servo repo and will be looking at ways I can contribute to a next gen AI free browser.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

              @alextecplayz here's the help page, so you can judge for yourself https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-ai-controls. We mostly refrain from using the term "opt-in" because people have different definitions of opt-in.

              Models don't download until you engage with the feature, but some folks have said it's only opt-in if even the entry points are in a separate binary.

              I asked for UI that shows downloaded models, but there wasn't time for that in 148. I'll keep asking for it πŸ˜€

              hittitezombie@mastodon.me.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
              hittitezombie@mastodon.me.ukH This user is from outside of this forum
              hittitezombie@mastodon.me.uk
              wrote last edited by
              #413

              @firefoxwebdevs @alextecplayz

              In and out are not difficult concepts. How can you even claim there are different 'definitions' of enforcing an option by default to something a user can decide to enable if needed?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                AI Controls (formerly 'kill switch') are landing in today's Firefox Nightly, and will land with Firefox 148 later this month.

                For the full details, see the Firefox blog https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-controls/

                juergen@chaos.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                juergen@chaos.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                juergen@chaos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #414

                @firefoxwebdevs Apart from disabling AI features of Firefox itself I would also like to have a choice of search engines without AI. For example, DuckDuckGo has a no AI version at https://noai.duckduckgo.com/ .

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                  @alextecplayz here's the help page, so you can judge for yourself https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-ai-controls. We mostly refrain from using the term "opt-in" because people have different definitions of opt-in.

                  Models don't download until you engage with the feature, but some folks have said it's only opt-in if even the entry points are in a separate binary.

                  I asked for UI that shows downloaded models, but there wasn't time for that in 148. I'll keep asking for it πŸ˜€

                  kagan@wandering.shopK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kagan@wandering.shopK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kagan@wandering.shop
                  wrote last edited by
                  #415

                  @firefoxwebdevs @alextecplayz No, everyoneΒΉ has the same, simple definition of opt-in: the user must take some deliberate action in order to turn on the feature. It's really that simple.

                  You don't want to use the term "opt-in" because *you know it would be a lie*, as that page makes clear the user must take action to _avoid_ having the feature. That's called "opt-out".

                  1. OK, everyone who isn't being disingenuous slime. Like Mozilla, apparently.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                    @giacomo @alextecplayz I don't think it's particularly unusual to offer features at the point they might be useful. This follows the pattern of e.g. asking for microphone permission. You're asked at a time that it might be useful to you, you don't have to say yes, and there are ways to avoid ever being asked.

                    memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                    memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                    memdmp@catgirl.center
                    wrote last edited by
                    #416

                    @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social @giacomo@snac.tesio.it @alextecplayz@techhub.social Microphone permissions never require going to the settings menu if you don't want to be asked again, you (when initially presented with them) just click "Don't ask again -> No" in the same menu you'd "opt into" them.

                    memdmp@catgirl.centerM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • memdmp@catgirl.centerM memdmp@catgirl.center

                      @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social @giacomo@snac.tesio.it @alextecplayz@techhub.social Microphone permissions never require going to the settings menu if you don't want to be asked again, you (when initially presented with them) just click "Don't ask again -> No" in the same menu you'd "opt into" them.

                      memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                      memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                      memdmp@catgirl.center
                      wrote last edited by
                      #417

                      @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social @giacomo@snac.tesio.it @alextecplayz@techhub.social Adding a second button next to the "AI Feature" simply stating "Don't show these again" that either immediately disables it, or disables it and opens a new tab with the preferences menu in that tab, is a way better UX flow.

                      memdmp@catgirl.centerM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • memdmp@catgirl.centerM memdmp@catgirl.center

                        @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social @giacomo@snac.tesio.it @alextecplayz@techhub.social Adding a second button next to the "AI Feature" simply stating "Don't show these again" that either immediately disables it, or disables it and opens a new tab with the preferences menu in that tab, is a way better UX flow.

                        memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                        memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                        memdmp@catgirl.center
                        wrote last edited by
                        #418

                        @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social @giacomo@snac.tesio.it @alextecplayz@techhub.social Also, clearly labeling it as "Enable AI Tab Group Suggestions" (or similar) or having a prompt like the one below (based loosely on Firefox Design Guidelines)

                        which is, whilst not "perfect", clearly a "Allow" -> Enables use in general, as described above it. Unless and until the user changes their mind. and "Deny" -> Disables it. Forever. Unless the user says otherwise. Learn more -> Hey I want some special setting or just want more info.

                        Link Preview Image
                        firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • farlukar@mas.toF farlukar@mas.to

                          @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard I like Vivaldi but I dislike a Chromium monoculture, so I'll begrudgingly be using a trimmed-down Firefox until Servo is in beta territory.

                          baszoetekouw@mastodon.nlB This user is from outside of this forum
                          baszoetekouw@mastodon.nlB This user is from outside of this forum
                          baszoetekouw@mastodon.nl
                          wrote last edited by
                          #419

                          @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @farlukar But Servo wull offer only a website Component, right, rather than a full browser? Are there any real open source non-firefox forks left?

                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD farlukar@mas.toF 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • baszoetekouw@mastodon.nlB baszoetekouw@mastodon.nl

                            @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @farlukar But Servo wull offer only a website Component, right, rather than a full browser? Are there any real open source non-firefox forks left?

                            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidgerard@circumstances.run
                            wrote last edited by
                            #420

                            @baszoetekouw @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @farlukar

                            yeah it's just the renderer. someone did a browser wrapper but the rendererer is still changing. but i expect there'll be a browser with all the browser stuff soon as servo is usable for real work.

                            ivanvector@oceanplayground.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.run
                              wrote last edited by
                              #421

                              @OctaviaConAmore @ivanvector @soatok @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs https://aidirtylist.info/

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • baszoetekouw@mastodon.nlB baszoetekouw@mastodon.nl

                                @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @farlukar But Servo wull offer only a website Component, right, rather than a full browser? Are there any real open source non-firefox forks left?

                                farlukar@mas.toF This user is from outside of this forum
                                farlukar@mas.toF This user is from outside of this forum
                                farlukar@mas.to
                                wrote last edited by
                                #422

                                @baszoetekouw @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard There are many browsers, but few render engines. The render engine is the hard part, as far as I can tell.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jaffathecake@mastodon.socialJ jaffathecake@mastodon.social

                                  @duke_of_germany @jonny @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard you've put "anti-AI crazies" in quotes so I assume you're quoting me. Can you point to where I said that? Or are you trying to mislead people?

                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nightclaw@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #423

                                  @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @jonny @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard excellent bad faith reading of what quotes are used for. I hope you get a raise, Jake.

                                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ada@beige.partyA ada@beige.party

                                    @firefoxwebdevs
                                    Where is the full change log of android version located? I would like to find out which exact version introduced device/screen lock on private tabs - that seemed to be the issue.

                                    firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #424

                                    @ada general release notes are at https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/android/127.0/releasenotes/, you can also search bugzilla. But, what makes you suspect the screen lock?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • memdmp@catgirl.centerM memdmp@catgirl.center

                                      @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social @giacomo@snac.tesio.it @alextecplayz@techhub.social Also, clearly labeling it as "Enable AI Tab Group Suggestions" (or similar) or having a prompt like the one below (based loosely on Firefox Design Guidelines)

                                      which is, whilst not "perfect", clearly a "Allow" -> Enables use in general, as described above it. Unless and until the user changes their mind. and "Deny" -> Disables it. Forever. Unless the user says otherwise. Learn more -> Hey I want some special setting or just want more info.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #425

                                      @memdmp @alextecplayz @giacomo fwiw, when you click "suggest more of my tabs", you get this:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N nightclaw@mastodon.social

                                        @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @jonny @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard excellent bad faith reading of what quotes are used for. I hope you get a raise, Jake.

                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #426

                                        @nightclaw @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @jonny @firefoxwebdevs now now, Jake is only talking like an abuser because he's being paid to

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                          @baszoetekouw @ivanvector @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @farlukar

                                          yeah it's just the renderer. someone did a browser wrapper but the rendererer is still changing. but i expect there'll be a browser with all the browser stuff soon as servo is usable for real work.

                                          ivanvector@oceanplayground.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ivanvector@oceanplayground.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ivanvector@oceanplayground.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #427

                                          @davidgerard @baszoetekouw @richardgrant @liquor_american @jaffathecake @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @farlukar Always choices to make moving away from American big tech.

                                          I've tried a few of the Firefox forks. I haven't tried Servo, but the ones I did try I eventually found that there were some things I do on the internet that I was just going to have to do without, with those forks. Or I would have to run two browsers, and then it's a very short road to "why bother? Just use Firefox". Firefox drinking the AI kool-aid pushed me to look at non-mozilla browsers.

                                          Vivaldi ticks enough of the boxes that I feel are important. I use Edge at work (it's the furthest I can get away from the company force-installing Chrome) so I'm already familiar with chromium. It's not fully FOSS, but the company says things about avoiding tracking and algorithms and prioritizing privacy that I want to hear. They're employee-owned, although I don't see a lot of detail on what exactly that means. And they're not American.

                                          Most importantly for me, almost everything I tried to do just worked out of the box. The only real issue I've had so far is that it uses extensions from the Chrome Web Store and is subject to Google's meddling there, so no uBlock Origin.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups